GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

After Angering GTA 5 Fans, Rockstar Releases New Statement On PC Mods [UPDATE]

Rockstar and Take-Two won't take action against single-player mods, but it's not quite that simple.

212 Comments

Update: A new update for OpenIV has now been released, seemingly with Rockstar's blessing. It's unclear what exactly about it has changed to abide by the rules outlined by Rockstar and Take-Two below, but this appears to be a positive move for the modding community.

Original Story: The recent legal shutdown of Grand Theft Auto V mod tool OpenIV angered fans, to say the least. Developer Rockstar Games has now released a new statement addressing its stance on mods, and while there is some good news, it still likely isn't what many people are hoping for.

In a post on its website, Rockstar reveals that it's spoken with its parent company, Take-Two, and convinced it to avoid pursuing legal action against certain types of mods. "Rockstar Games believes in reasonable fan creativity, and, in particular, wants creators to showcase their passion for our games," the statement reads. "After discussions with Take-Two, Take-Two has agreed that it generally will not take legal action against third-party projects involving Rockstar's PC games that are single-player, non-commercial, and respect the intellectual property (IP) rights of third parties."

No Caption Provided

There are, of course, other restrictions as well: "This does not apply to (i) multiplayer or online services; (ii) tools, files, libraries, or functions that could be used to impact multiplayer or online services, or (iii) use or importation of other IP (including other Rockstar IP) in the project," the statement continues. "This is not a license, and it does not constitute endorsement, approval, or authorization of any third-party project. Take-Two reserves the right to object to any third-party project, or to revise, revoke and/or withdraw this statement at any time in their own discretion. This statement does not constitute a waiver of any rights that Take-Two may have with respect to third-party projects."

All of this started when Take-Two issued a cease-and-desist to the developers of OpenIV, which is a tool that is used to power numerous GTA V mods. Take-Two and Rockstar subsequently explained that this wasn't intended to specifically target single-player mods and that "malicious mods that allow harassment of players and interfere with the GTA Online experience for everybody" were the real problem. The companies also said they were investigating how to "continue to support the creative community without negatively impacting our players." Despite this, there was an outcry from fans, who sunk the game's average user review score on Steam. Additionally, a petition calling for OpenIV to be left alone has attracted nearly 77,000 signatures as of this writing.

Today's statement doesn't totally clarify what the future of GTA V mods looks like. OpenIV would seemingly still be disallowed by these rules, despite not directly targeting GTA Online. Rockstar told Motherboard that it's spoken with OpenIV's developer about allowing it to continue, but at this point, it remains unclear where things go from here.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 212 comments about this story
212 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for hotwog21
hotwog21

843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

LOL YOU WILL PLAY WHAT WE TELL YOU TO PLAY, WHEN TO PLAY IT, HOW LONG TO PLAY IT FOR. OUR TERMS, NOT YOURS. YOU ARE THE CONSUMER, UR JOB IS TO BE CONSUME, NOW RUN ALONG, YOU'VE GOT XP TO GRIND OR PAY FOR (INGAME PURCHASES)

PERIOD.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DeadPhoenix86
DeadPhoenix86

2001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@hotwog21: And yet I have never bought a single shark card and own everything in the game :P and that's by only playing 3 a hours a day, by selling MC Business, CEO Warehouses, Vehicle warehouses, and now Bunkers too. That's easily 2 mil a day if done by a group of friends ;). Unless You're lazy, then go ahead buy shark cards. But you make plenty of money in game already.

3 • 
Avatar image for rmpumper
rmpumper

2352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

So in other words: "If you are going to mess with our profits in MP, we will **** you in the ass".

Upvote • 
Avatar image for khaos107
khaos107

75

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By khaos107

Too bad I can't mod these comments to make them less idiotic! I'd still be playing GTA5 if I was able to mod it as much San Andreas or 4. There's a difference between creating cheats that ruin online and customizing your single player experience. Why can't they just keep mods off the online portion of the game? Is it really that hard?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DeadPhoenix86
DeadPhoenix86

2001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@khaos107: Some People like to be ruin someone else's experience. This pretty much happen in every game. Their goal is to make other people Cry or Rage quit.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for cuthbert51
cuthbert51

58

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By cuthbert51

Rockstar was right at first. Mods are despicable and never do anything but ruin games. It's a horrendous practice better left to the guttertrash of the industry, and an embarrassment that anyone would try to defend an indefensible practice.

Speaking of dumb, why does this site automatically upvote my own comment? I had to physically un-upvote my own comment. Not because I think I'm wrong, but why would anyone have the audacity to upvote their own statement?

2 • 
Avatar image for hawkensha
Hawkensha

145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@cuthbert51: Speaking of dumb, your comment

6 • 
Avatar image for Salt_AU
Salt_AU

1299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

PC Gamers whining and crying? Never!

3 • 
Avatar image for hawkensha
Hawkensha

145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Salt_AU: console bendover race. When PC gamers talk, developers listen. Unlike the console children, nobody cares about them. You take what you get!

2 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-610c3819be19e
deactivated-610c3819be19e

409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@hawkensha: They listen like a parent shutting up their kid in public....do a little to just stop all the mindless complaining, christ. This is why you'll never get another Rockstar game on PC. Hahah. Mark my words. Red Dead 2 once again, will be console exclusive. This is why PC gamers are game testers for console and nothing more.

I still never understood the whole 'Masterrace' thing? Paying to develop video games for others sounds more like slave work? AND you pay for it. Hiiiiiiilarious little wierdo you all are.

2 • 
Avatar image for hawkensha
Hawkensha

145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@WingChopMasta: How does one respond to clear cut bullshit? I was not complaining. This is incoherent garbage.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for E_J_S
E_J_S

100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

So if that's the language companies understand, I assume there's no harm in doing all this shit again when GTA6 eventually gets announced for consoles only, while PC gets a delayed version?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for cuthbert51
cuthbert51

58

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@E_J_S: Hopefully. The console-only part.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

63834

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

Interesting. It seems Steam is one of the few bastions where gamers actually have anything approaching a voice.

7 • 
Avatar image for ef56sd
EF56SD

481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@uninspiredcup: As much as I enjoy mods, I would say dropping a rating of a great game because you're throwing a fit is not only petty but selfish as hell.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for PSYCHOV3N0M
PSYCHOV3N0M

1221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

"A new update for OpenIV has now been released, seemingly with Rockstar's blessing."

Ahh you smell that? That's the smell of the POWER that we as a whole have over the internet.....

4 • 
Avatar image for cuthbert51
cuthbert51

58

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@PSYCHOV3N0M: It isn't power. It's Rockstar knowing it's a dumb fight to be in, even when they were right.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for PSYCHOV3N0M
PSYCHOV3N0M

1221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@timmyp1982: I get what you're trying to say but it has nothing to do with that. What I mean by that is that THEY knew this and wanted OpenIV shut down regardless of the truth. What CHANGED their tune however big or small the change is that WE the internet aka the consumers fought back with our voices and they heard AND reacted. In my book, THAT is power that WE have. If we had stayed silent, Rockstar/Take-Two wouldn't have done anything after the shutdown.

Upvote •