GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Amid Sony/Marvel Dispute, Spider-Man's Tom Holland Says New Movie Will Be "Very Different"

The movie will be "something very special" and "different," Tom Holland says.

29 Comments

Even if Spider-Man leaves the Marvel Cinematic Universe because of the dispute between Disney/Marvel Studios and Sony, Tom Holland will return to take on the role of Peter Parker. Last weekend at the Keystone Comic-Con in Philadelphia, the Spider-Man actor confirmed that there is likely to be at least one more Spidey movie with him in the lead role, according to GameSpot sister site ComicBook.

In fact, Holland pointed out that he and the creative team have already pitched a third Spider-Man movie. It was previously confirmed that Far From Home writers Chris McKenna and Erik Sommers will return for the third movie, and they are apparently taking an outside-of-the-box approach to their concept for it.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Now Playing: Marvel Studios’ Kevin Feige No Longer Producing Spider-Man Movies - GSU News Update

"We sat down with some of our creatives. We pitched Spider-Man 3, which is going to be something very special, it's going to be something very different," Holland said.

It's unknown right now if director Jon Watts will come back for the third film. It was recently reported that Marvel is now trying to hire Watts for another movie, as he is not yet signed on for any additional Spider-Man films. Holland also spoke about his future as Spider-Man, and he referred to Marvel in the past tense with Sony as his future.

"I'm just so grateful that Marvel changed my life and allowed my dreams to come true and Sony allowing me to continue living my dream," he said. "It's a crazy week and it's never been done before so we'll see how it goes and it'll be as amazing and as fun."

Holland wasn't clear how the next film will be different, but we may be able to glean insight from MCU boss Kevin Feige. Months before the split, he said in an interview with CinemaBlend that going forward, Spider-Man will be less in the shadow of the larger MCU.

"So in terms of your question about going forward, it'll be fun to see Spidey back in his element, out of the shadow of Tony, out of the shadow of the other Avengers, as his own man now, as his own hero," Feige said. "And yet now facing his own challenges that aren't coming from Avengers fighting, like Civil War, or aliens coming, like Infinity War or Endgame. It's all Peter focused and Peter based."

It sounds as if a more traditional Peter-focused solo film was already being planned before the split, and that approach would still make sense in a post-MCU Spidey world.

Last week, news broke that Disney and Marvel could not agree on terms regarding the future of Spider-Man movies. Sony holds the movie rights to Spider-Man. Years ago, Sony and Disney agreed on a deal to have Spider-Man join the MCU, beginning with Captain America: Civil War. That deal was never expected to last forever, and now it seems it is coming to an end. A recent report suggested Feige would no longer be involved with producing Spider-Man movies, as Disney/Marvel and Sony could not agree to terms. The end result, many believe, is that Spider-Man will not be a part of the MCU going forward, although that has not been explicitly confirmed yet. (It's also possible Sony and Disney could still agree to some new deal.)

Sony has a history of producing its own Spider-Man movies, as the company made the original Spider-Man films starring Tobey Maguire and later the Amazing Spider-Man franchise with Andrew Garfield. Most recently, it produced Venom, which was entirely separate from the MCU.

Back in July, Marvel Studios boss Kevin Feige talked about how the next Spider-Man movie will "have to do something completely different" due to the events of Far From Home. If you've seen the movie, you know what he's talking about.

It is no surprise that Sony wants to make more Spider-Man movies with Holland, as Homecoming and Far From Home were enormously successful at the box office. Homecoming made $880 million at the box office, with Far From Home bringing in $1.11 billion to surpass Skyfall ($1.108 billion) to become Sony's highest-grossing movie ever.

Even with Spider-Man leaving the MCU, Disney will continue to benefit from the character as it gets 100% of the money from Spider-Man merchandise. (Disney paid Sony a reported one-time $175 million fee for the Spider-Man merch rights, in addition to an annual royalty fee around $30 million.)

In addition to Spider-Man, Sony is investing in Holland with the Uncharted movie where Holland plays a younger Nathan Drake. The movie recently lost director Dan Trachtenberg, but Holland is still on board and the movie aims to start shooting in early 2020.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 29 comments about this story
29 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for pillarrocks
pillarrocks

4128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

I am disappointed a deal couldn't be worked out. Spiderman 3 isn't going to be the same without the MCU. I really was looking forward to see how Spiderman 3 turns out under Sony.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for xenomorphalien
XenomorphAlien

5118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

This is really gonna mess up the MCU, they need to renegotiate another deal.

3 • 
Avatar image for 02050muh
02050muh

802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Disney will ruin MCU. For me, MCU ended with Endgame. Everything else now is non canon

3 • 
Avatar image for TJDMHEM
TJDMHEM

3298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I'll have to check it out.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-60368fd7c2c18
deactivated-60368fd7c2c18

631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

Does anybody know if/when will Sony's rights to Spiderman end?

I am assuming that if there's chance to get it back, Marvel will jump on it.

Spidey will be missed from the MCU almost as much as the Xmen were missed from Infinity wars and Endgame.

THe X-Men problem seems to have been resolved with the Fox purchase, Now there's only one obstacle going back in time one more time and doing this thing properly.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Sindred
Sindred

201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Sindred

Good! Very good! Maybe it won't be Avengers: Starring Spiderman. Or Iron Man: Starring Spiderman.

2 • 
Avatar image for elric3000
elric3000

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Actually sounds good. VENOM was fun, and MOBIUS looks interesting.

But...NOW will they take Peter OUT of High School already?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for pillarrocks
pillarrocks

4128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

@elric3000:

I would love to see Peter Parker in college in the third movie. Sony could throw in Dr. Curt Connors and Dr. Otto Octavius as potential villains.

2 • 
Avatar image for rwpffan
Rwpffan

2

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Into the Spider-Verse was great and Venom almost made 800 mil. Sony is doing fine with Spider-Man and it’s related characters. It’s not Sony’s fault Marvel was giving away long term movie rights to its most beloved characters on the cheap in the 1990s. Sony ain’t going to give them back for free.

2 • 
Avatar image for doa2169
DOA2169

241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Here is the upfront honest truth; Sony has failed to make a decent Spider-Man movie in the past 14 years. If Spider-Man is no longer a part of the MCU, and those stories don't progress Phase 4 thru 6, then there really isn't any motivation to go see another failed Sony Spider-Man movie.

3 • 
Avatar image for rwpffan
Rwpffan

2

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@doa2169: Didn’t see Into the Spider-Verse I take it?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for xenomorphalien
XenomorphAlien

5118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

@rwpffan: You mean a movie that's good because of it's legendary directors and has nothing to do with Sony?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for doa2169
DOA2169

241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@rwpffan: Was Into the Spider Verse a part of the MCU? And fine, Sony hasn't made a decent LIVE ACTION Spider-Man movie in 14 years.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Sepewrath
Sepewrath

30731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Yeah its going to be different, its going to suck. Sony hasn't made a good Spider-Man movie since SM2.

3 • 
Avatar image for timthegem
timthegem

1239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By timthegem

Word is that Spidey will try to stop a raging psychopath from launching nuclear missiles into a hurricane while world leaders are being held hostage on a golf course. Sounds terrifying.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for bakula
Bakula

472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Of course it will be. Sony sucks with these properties. So, it now won't be getting any money from me and will be downloaded. I hope they're happy. Sorry you got stuck with these hacks, Tom Holland.

2 • 
Avatar image for Thanatos2k
Thanatos2k

17660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Sure it'll be different. It'll be garbage, like their last Spiderman 3 and the other Amazing Sony Spiderman trash.

2 • 
Avatar image for urbanman2004
urbanman2004

849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Third time's a charm, as in charm I mean flop ?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jaguar10books
jaguar10books

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Yeah, it will be different. Spiderman will be a woke transsexual!

3 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5fa6d5c3cf764
deactivated-5fa6d5c3cf764

102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@jaguar10books: That would be if Disney had control and they dont so your comment = fail

3 • 
Avatar image for r31ya
r31ya

165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

175mil merch rights and 30mil per movie royalties.

It cost 175mil to make Far From Home and Sony pay most of it. Disney is now asking for 50/50 in production cost and profit without Fevin Fiege as Producer

Sony dislike the idea and offer less than 50/50 with Kevin Fiege as producer. Disney disagress and the news broke.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for gohan_3
gohan_3

1094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By gohan_3

It's been said marvel really didnt contribute much to the spider movies. It will be different but dont write off the new one, at the very least give it a chance for everyone else involved who obviously have a passion for the work, including the actor for spiderman Tom Holland. He loves being spiderman and it shows, give him your support and give it a chance. He's a major part of why you enjoy these movies its not just the added in marvel lore here and there.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Sepewrath
Sepewrath

30731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@gohan_3: Sony only paid for the movies, all of the content therein was a product of Marvel. When Sony is control of the content you get SM3 and the Amazing Spider-Man movies and the dumpster fire that was Venom. I don't have high hopes for them shoehorning Spider-Man into their Venom movie.

2 • 
Avatar image for bakula
Bakula

472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@gohan_3: "It's been said marvel really didnt contribute much to the spider movies." LOL. I really don't know what else to say. It's that absolutely preposterous. Sony is ATROCIOUS with these properties. Marvel is responsible for any good thing regarding the source material. Without them the movies would have been VASTLY different. If you believe otherwise you're simply a fool and don't understand Marvel's involvement.

2 • 
Avatar image for OdinXivraj
OdinXivraj

139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

"...it's going to be something very different"

Your right. The other movies where good and had effort put in to them.

3 • 
Avatar image for tsunami2311
tsunami2311

1842

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

"Sony has a history of producing its own Spider-Man movies, as the company made the original Star Wars films starring Tobey Maguire"

I was unaware Sony made Original Star Wars films let alone Tobey Maquire was in them seeing he wasnt even born yet

7 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-60368fd7c2c18
deactivated-60368fd7c2c18

631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

@tsunami2311: I think they pulled a Russo Brothers and came up with the BS time travel explanation.

We must be in one of those alternate dimensions the Ancient One warned us about. Not that it matters since Captain America came back without problems. So, I guess Typo is another explanation.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for danthemank
Danthemank

1

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@tsunami2311: Toby Maquire was born when the original Star Wars films came out. He just would have been a child.

2 • 
Avatar image for eddienoteddy
eddienoteddy

43226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 1

eddienoteddy  Staff

@tsunami2311: This has been corrected now. Thanks!

2 •