GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Analyzing how gold is distributed for each EU LCS team

A look at how each team distributes their gold relatively compared by role and how this illustrates each team's strategy and star players.

Comments

This article was originally published on GameSpot's sister site onGamers.com, which was dedicated to esports coverage.

With the success of the NA article, I wanted to look at gold distribution for EU LCS this time. The way this was calculated by taking the average gold distribution between roles (20.89% of gold to top laner, 18.35% to Jungler, 22.83% to Mid, 23.76% to AD Carry, and 14.17% to Support), then from here we looked at how each team distributed their gold, and then looked at how each team compared relative to the EU averages. The following represents how each team compares to the average role:

No Caption Provided

How to interpret these graphs

Inspired by a comment last article by Jatt, I wanted to put a few notes to help with interpreting what exactly these charts mean, as there end up with a bunch of misconceptions.

  1. These values are relative to each role’s average. When you see a team like Fnatic it doesn’t mean that Yellowstar gets more absolute gold than Rekkles. It just means that Yellowstar, relative to other supports, gets more gold than Rekkles gets relative to other AD carries.
  2. More gold =/= Better Performance. This metric is more used to measure style of play, rather than “who is the best”. Just because Diamond gets the most gold in the jungle does not absolutely make him best jungler, there are many other factors to conceptualize performance.
  3. This data was balanced to ignore the “Winning Bias” shown in NA version. Now the averages are weighted in a way that these values are adjusted so that there is no longer “the top teams get more objective gold which makes their graphs more consistent”. For more info on how this is done, see this comment.

How I interpret these graphs

One of the main goals of these graphics is to generate discussion, where you can take the information yourself and form whatever opinions you want based on it. However, I have a few of my own theories after being so intimately involved with the data, so I will go team by team and break it down:

Gambit Gaming:

I think it is no surprise that Diamond takes up the biggest proportion of his teams gold compared to other junglers, he is known for his farm and counter-jungle style. But it is interesting that he has the highest relative positive spike. In a team like Gambit, where every player has its “star quality”, its interesting to see such an extreme graph.

SK Gaming:

SK has one of the most balanced graphs of each team, which was a surprise to me. My feeling from watching SK is that they somewhat rode on freddy’s back, with him split pushing on a carry-style top laner like Shyvana. I expected a spike in top lane’s area, but SK ended up with a very balanced graphic, with exception of Jesiz. Something worth noting, is that this is a tied for first team in EU, the region of mid laners, but their mid laner gets significantly less proportional gold (the 2nd least in EU), which is an interesting contrast compared to the other top 5 teams.

Alliance:

Alliance holds the biggest peak for mid laners, which is of course Froggen. I guess despite the roster changes it has still stayed as the “Froggen is the star” show, but it was interesting that Froggen was so heavily ahead, with Wickd also being above-average.

Fnatic:

The biggest unique factor in Fnatic’s graph is Cyanide’s lack of gold, which we covered previously in the Fnatic article. Cyanide is by far the most selfless jungler, especially when it comes to getting minion/monster kills, he basically stops farming after 25 min. The other wrinkle here is the bot lane of Fnatic, which Rekkles is known for amassing gold, and is the current GPM leader overall, and Yellowstar currently leads in Assists for all players.

Roccat:

As the streak of volatile junglers continues, the next spike is for Roccat’s Jankos, the minion/monster kills leader among junglers. This graph lines up with our expectations, with Jankos and Overpow being the spikes for this team, while Celaver and Xaxus get below-average distribution.

Copenhagen Wolves:

This CW graph lines up a lot with my expectations, as Amazing is clearly the star of the team, but Forg1ven has been consistently putting up high GPM numbers despite losing, and Unlimited who has the 3rd highest kill participation in the league, as well as 2nd most total assists behind Yellowstar.

Super Hot Crew:

SHC has the most balanced graph, with the Mid, ADC, Jungle, and Support almost all hitting average, and top being the only spike. This is actually very rare in EU, as top laners very rarely get the highest relative gold, and Mimer doesn’t even put up exceptional stats. I think it is mostly this way because of how low total gold SHC as a team averages.

Millenium

Mil has the most crazy graph, which somewhat reflects their awkward performance so far this split. Kev1n and Creaton are seen as their "stars", but I think this is a not so good distribution and might be somewhat the cause of their lack of success. This low-farm role of Araneae does not fit with his champion picks, such as Lee Sin, Evelynn, and Vi, which are some of the more farm-intensive junglers.

Data collected with help by the onGamers Stats team: Derek 'Kathix' Adams, Steven 'whedgehead' Falgout, Kent 'Traepoint' Frasure, Jake Morales, and James 'PelkaSupaFresh' Pelkey. Design by Ben 'Sarcasmappreciated' Li.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are no comments about this story