Battlefield and Medal of Honor audiences different, says EA

I don't want to think about all of that, just give me a gun and unleash me.

whatever. just make sure it's not another CoD.

Make Medal of Honor like COD, which they seem to have already done with the first one and B3, and make Battlefield a Bad Company experience, though the actual Bad Company games should be more fiction-ish like the previous ones.

Wise decision, but how will this work: at once differentiating and growing together both franchises...?

SOMEONE SEND ME A PLACE TO DOWNLOAD "vietcong" PLEASE!!! I used to kill in on Vietnam and that less known game "vietcong". that game was too good, super realistic guns loading and jamming. i averaged like 56K to 12D

Dude is worried about sequel fatigue yet they're already working on Battlefield 4 before Battlefield 3's second out of four expansions is even out.

I'm fed up with this sand pit games style, having a bunch of REDBULL over dozed 12 old kids running around in the map shooting like there is no tomorrow is worst than a strobe light flashing at your face....

I think game developers are paying more attention to this king of gamers, fast, furious, lack of style, zero retention, short spam memory, and no interest what so ever about that old game mode called "CO-OP" non of that.... the second the game start, every one runs like a fu....ing psico to every random direction, and that same wave of gamer are flooding into BF3, and turning in into a "run with a LAV on your one and leave the rest srtanded" kind of game, that's why, I believe they dont utilize all the map....:(

I don't care nor want either franchise, CODMW included. I have no interest in the MP aspects and crazy nor the obsessive and egotistical competitive garbage that is in everything now ruining gaming now days. Maybe when they get back to focusing on the SP like the old games I would care, but until then I wont. I quit COD at COD3.

Of course Medal of Honour is different, its going to get a special edition exclusively just for the military, that's how hardcore this revolutionary new Call of Duty clone is!

if MOH has 24 player battles in ridiculously small maps and all of the guns are the same and have no recoil, this game will suck.

What a load of BS lol, MOH is just the 2nd part of BF3 we didn't get.

" EA did research and found the Medal of Honor community enjoys "more authentic shooters and the story."

Oh please. EA did the research and decided they'd simply try to clone Activision's COD and try to muscle in on milking that cash cow. Plain and simple. Battlefield, as someone stated below, is a beast unto itself. Medal of Honor, on the other hand, is a joke. If I wanted to play COD, I'd play COD. Not some wreck of a rip-off.

thats actually a pretty good strategy compared to COD, which does one thing and is to outdo itself with bloated ridiculousness. the problem is that so far Medal of Honor feels like an amalgamation of COD and Battlefield and unfortunately it inharited their bad parts more than their better.

Battlefield truly is a beast of it's own, and MOH isn't. MOH relays on "authenticity" and it's love to special forces... thats thematically a pretty positive thing, but that's a theme rather than a gameplay element or the experience.

the other problem is that DICE still are big dog around i don't see how Danger Close have half the charisma and expertise to match them and match the "Battlefield" experience.

i still can't see how Warfighter compare to a game where you can jump out of a jet, RPG the jet chasing you and jump back into the jet.

there is a reason Battlefield is so popular, yes it's a millitary first person shooter- but it's a different type of shooter, it's bigger, it's mechanized and it's actually a sandbox experience.

I don't think they are all that different when you look at the single player aspect. MOH is just a watered down COD (as far as theatrics), and BF was just a bit more polished (engine, lighting, graphics), but all in all, I don't see a huge difference in the single player of both games.

To say that people aren't fans of both might be somewhat true, but I think seeing as how they are both shooters, it isn't like we are comparing Skyrim to Madden or something along those lines. What is probably a better assertion is that COD fans are more likely to gravitate toward MOH since there is no vehicle combat and the game lends itself better to lone wolf strategy, whereas BF is more of a tactical team oriented shooter.

That being said, I think what he really means is, "MOH is our attempt to recreate COD, and take some of that fan base, while BF is intended to stay closer to it's roots." I just hope that the next BF game totally leaves single player out.