GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Birds Of Prey Gets New Title After Its Poor Start At The Box Office

Introducing Harley Quinn: Birds of Prey.

157 Comments

In an attempt to draw in new viewers, the new DC Comics movie Birds of Prey has changed its name following its slow start at the box office. The movie is changing its theatrical name from Birds of Prey (and the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn) to Harley Quinn: Birds of Prey, according to GameSpot sister site ComicBook.com. Note that this is only the theatrical name; the official title remains the same.

The name change is already visible through major American ticket-sellers like Regal Cinemas and AMC Theatres, though Warner Bros. has yet to officially comment on the change. The change is reportedly meant to boost SEO and generally make the film more recognizable. (It's also not the only movie to change its name post-release, although it is very uncommon.)

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Now Playing: Birds of Prey Spoiler Review & Easter Eggs - Why It's Our Favorite Modern DC Film Yet

Birds of Prey star Margot Robbie, who plays Harley Quinn and is also a producer on the movie, recently foreshadowed this change in an appearance on the Hot Ones podcast.

Asked what the most nerve-wracking part of being a producer is, Robbie said it's watching the first-week box office numbers come in, because at that point, there is almost nothing you can do to improve the fortunes of a film. A marketing change might help things, but it might not be enough, she said. This very marketing change is now happening.

"The most nerve-wracking ... probably the box office," she said. "At that point, you can't do anything anymore. You can pivot your marketing strategy a little bit but really there's not a lot you can do. You just hope people like it. You and so many people have spent so much time on something that you just want people to like it, or even see it."

Birds of Prey, which is an R-rated movie, opened to $33.2 million in the US, which is many millions below projections. It's the worst start in the history of the DCEU movie franchise, but that's not a great comparison as Birds of Prey is also the first R-rated movie in the DCEU.

Birds of Prey's slow start came as a surprise, as the movie fared well with critics and carries a strong B+ CinemaScore rating.

In GameSpot's review of Birds of Prey, Meg Downey said, "It's the sort of kinetic, high energy romp that comes with built-in replay value, and proves exactly why Harley Quinn has become such an endearing, beloved character in the pop-culture pantheon. If this is the direction the DCEU is headed, the future's looking bright."

For more on Birds of Prey, find out more about the ending of the movie, whether or not Joker is in the movie, and the connection to Harley's first appearance in Suicide Squad.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 157 comments about this story
157 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for ives74
Ives74

305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Ives74

When you front load politics into a piece of entertainment is ceases to be entertainment and becomes a bummer.

16 • 
Avatar image for robbehG
robbehG

259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ives74: Yeah I hate politics in my movies. Now excuse me, I'm going to go watch my good apolitical films like The Joker and play my proper apolitical games like Bioshock, Metal Gear Solid, and Fallout.

16 • 
Avatar image for Roman217
Roman217

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@robbehG: People don't want real politics. People play games and watch movies to escape from the real world. If a game/movie can leverage fictional politics in such a way that is entertaining then great, but no one wants to watch something with an agenda trying to "educate" in biased SJW bullcrap.

6 • 
Avatar image for robbehG
robbehG

259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Roman217: 'sjw bullcrap' aka 'no politics I personally disagree with'

2 • 
Avatar image for Roman217
Roman217

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@robbehG: Can you name a particular form of entertainment that pushes real world politics other than SJW politics? I can't, because liberal SJWs rule Hollywood and the gaming industry. If there were examples of real world politics in games/movies that were conservative theme I'd be equally against it, but that's not a problem now, noisy SJWs are the problem.

6 • 
Avatar image for Thanatos2k
Thanatos2k

17660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Thanatos2k

@Roman217: Richard Jewell had conservative 'fake news' politics pushed hard, while it made up stuff about the reporters involved to make them look worse.

So there's a FEW times it happens in movies. It's nonexistent in video games though.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for robbehG
robbehG

259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Roman217: Well I think some are good intentioned and well done, like naughty dog.

But there are plenty more that appropriate progressive themes because they think it will earn them more money. Disney comes to mind. Their movies please middle aged moderate "progressives". But otherwise tarnish important progressive movements.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for zousa81
Zousa81

141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

@robbehG: maybe you are being too subtle for me, but can you identify any game pushing politics that are not in the progressive agenda? Or gaming journalism for that matter? Where is the non-SJW political crap?

2 • 
Avatar image for robbehG
robbehG

259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@zousa81: define the 'progressive agenda'.

3 • 
Avatar image for robbehG
robbehG

259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Roman217: So storytelling mediums should never try to grapple with real world issues? What are you? The fucking thought police?

5 • 
Avatar image for zousa81
Zousa81

141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

Edited By Zousa81

@robbehG: Grapple real world issues without preaching to your audience about who is right and who is wrong. We don't need a game to tell us "Orange man bad". Bioshock doesn't (or even tries to) tell us whether Andrew Ryan is"good" or "evil" and that's how it should be done. Even the villain is just a guy taking advantage of a situation as do tons of people in the real world.

And nobody is saying they can't. Go ahead, but be ready to lose customers.

3 • 
Avatar image for robbehG
robbehG

259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@zousa81: I mean bioshock definitely tells you weather andrew ryan was right or wrong.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Roman217
Roman217

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Roman217

@robbehG: Get woke go broke. That's literally all that has to be said to your response. The fact that this is true for mediums that leverage real world politics proves my point that the majority of consumers agree with my opinion. It's not about being the thought police, these companies sure as hell are free to try, but when it fails they have no one to blame but themselves when consumers don't give a single damn about their lousy abomination.

8 • 
Avatar image for zousa81
Zousa81

141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

@robbehG: We can focus on social issues and films and games, if it is done in a way that expects the audience to think on their own. When a game or film tells the movie what to think, what is wrong or right, that's politics done badly.

Bioshock for examples starts with this utopic society, and then analyses how that society would work. It doesn't say it is good or bad, it just shows logic consequences of what would happen, namely the classic "in a city of geniuses, someone still has to clean the toilets".

2 • 
Avatar image for robbehG
robbehG

259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@zousa81: I also think audiences should be able to think on their own. But apparently when they do, they get "in a city of geniuses, someone still has to clean the toilets" from one of the most blatant critiques of uncontrolled capitalism in gaming history.

2 • 
Avatar image for zousa81
Zousa81

141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

Edited By Zousa81

@robbehG: the game doesn't tell you outright capitalism is bad, it shows it can be bad through narrative and logical outcomes. When you come to the realization that, yes someone must still the toilets, it's just addressing reality, not outright saying anything is bad.

In the end of the day actors should just stick to acting and stop making political statement. In my work, the fastest way to lose customer is to start discussing politics with them, and here you have actor bringing their political beliefs front and center. Some "customer" decide to spend their money elsewhere.

2 • 
Avatar image for lagbolt68
lagbolt68

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

This is what happens when you have people like Ewan McGregor on television spewing non sense about this being a feminist film. Nobody wants to be preached at. They don't want to go to the movies to be lectured. Which we all know Hollywood loves to do. The sad thing is, I heard it's not even a feminist film. It's just a B action movie with ladies at the forefront.

11 • 
Avatar image for dlist4ever
DList4ever

213

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@lagbolt68: There seems to be a lot of that whenever there's a chick in a movie these days: some group of audience members take an ordinary movie and try to claim it's some political commentary.

Honestly? I've stopped listening after the 4th or 5th time that I finally sat down and watched the movie and discovered that it's only "political agenda" was to have a woman in it. At that point, I realized who the real side with the agenda was and started ignoring them.

After all: "You run into an a-hole in the morning, you've run into an a-hole. If you keep running into a-holes all day, you're the one being an a-hole."

I don't know who or what started this trend but, honestly, I just cannot wait for it to pass. In the meantime, I've stopped checking out any user reviews of any kind for things-- including Metacritic.

3 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-602c39239dcbb
deactivated-602c39239dcbb

155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@lagbolt68: it isn't just a feminist movie, it's a misandrist movie. How did she get the John Wick moves, and the story was just terrible. it is just a psychologist who turns into a stubborn child.

7 • 
Avatar image for scrubmatic
scrubmatic

59

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By scrubmatic

Doesn't every Hollywood movie make its money back after blu-ray, premium channel, airplane, hotel, streaming services, cable, network TV, betamax deals?

It sucks she didn't quadruple her investment for what sounds like a good movie, but I doubt she risked or lost all too much, if anything.

Also, releasing it in February is on the producers. If they are afraid to release their film alongside other Summer blockbusters, they should expect a low turnout in a low turnout time of year.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for roktok9002
roktok9002

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By roktok9002

This is pathetic.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for mcnichoj
mcnichoj

1880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

If they wanted a Harley movie so bad, they should have just made a Harley movie. They call it Birds of Prey but it's not a BoP movie.

5 • 
Avatar image for sladakrobot
sladakrobot

11910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By sladakrobot

When i saw the title for the very first time without having any clues, i thought its about Star Trek :D
I heard almost only good things about the movie,its a shame it wasnt received that well at box office

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Iemander
Iemander

757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Honestly, there's again too much humor in this film and it doesn't suit it. It's like they're watching too much marvel at WB. And not enough Joker/Christopher Nolan's Dark knight trilogy, etc.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for doa2169
DOA2169

241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@Iemander: Humor is has never really been the problem with DC movies, story is the problem. Most of the stories are boring. They made these huge destruction porn movies boring.

8 • 
Avatar image for heidern98
Heidern98

282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Oh good, I thought we would get through a day without another Birds of Prey article, but I should have known better. Best DC movie ever!

9 • 
Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

49512

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@heidern98: Bruh, don't you know they get lots of money to print one article a day?

Poor gamespot doesn't have time, nor do they get money, to shine a light on video games.

If anything I feel sorry for this website, and the people writing the articles.

5 • 
Avatar image for theduckofdeath
theduckofdeath

1468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Surprise...

3 • 
Avatar image for firedrakes
firedrakes

4469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

one big issu was poor ad for this movie

Upvote • 
Avatar image for doa2169
DOA2169

241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

The title IS NOT the problem. The problem is it is a terrible movie, but I am a man and obviously I hate women.

12 • 
Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

49512

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By R4gn4r0k

@doa2169: Yeah, just like with Ghostbusters the excuse will be: "bu bu bu people just hate women QQ"

8 • 
Avatar image for cappy
Cappy

751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Well I am a perfect example of why this is a good idea. I heard / read the original movie title several times, like as quick references or links, and I had no idea it was the Harley Quinn movie until now. I thought it was a different movie entirely and had pictured it to be a serious drama or dark action film.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sparent180
SParent180

995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By SParent180

@cappy: I wonder how common this is. 

"I thought it was a different movie entirely and had pictured it to be a serious drama or dark action film"

This is the first thing that came to mind when I heard about the title change. For people that didn't see a trailer and just heard the title your imagination can kind of run wild with what this movie is about. Nature documentary about birds? Horror movie with killer birds? Even for comic fans Birds of Prey isn't a stand out group of characters.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for superklyph
SuperKlyph

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

Eh that's sad and desperate

3 • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

8024

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By jenovaschilld

I think the studios have forgotten just how burnt the audience is on DC movies, well... let me repeat 'on certain kinds of DC movies'. From BvS, S S, to J L, just how shell shocked can your potential audience get before taking the risk and venturing out to pay $20 to see another massacre on screen. Your hardcore initial fanbase is busy making memes about how bad the DC Zac Snyder properties are- so you should expect a toxic release. While these movies did incredibly well, their receipts kept going down, and if WB released another Superman V Batman they would expect a much lower return.

Shazam did $53 mill opening/ 345ish ww, considered little better then breaking even - also was labeled as a 'comedy action hero' and tried to get as far from the other DC IPs as possible.

Aquaman - slow start then onto 1 billion ww, 1/3 of which was obsessive China, and the a large part to distancing itself from the recent DC universe - only one line of dialogue in the entire movie tying it to DC and it was about Steppenwolfe. And lets not forget it was a really damn good movie.

Wonder Woman - excellent movie with director Patty Jenkins and straight off the page Gal Gadot. AT a 800mill total ww.

But also releasing a risky movie in the dead of winter, when school/ college/ work is busiest was not the right time. Birds of Prey does not have the WW fanbase built up by nearly a century of comics translated around the world, since Harley Quinn was only introduced in the Batman animated series in the 90s and the Birds of Prey biggest exposure was a failed WB drama.

But this movie has gotten really good reviews, it may start off slow but keep its head up long enough to gain a fanbase. Even Guadians of the Galaxy started really slow, but stayed in the box office for 4 months by word of mouth alone. Blade Runner bombed at the box office but everyone knows it by heart. Dune, Shawshank Redemption, The Thing and many many more. Oh i am not saying BoP is going to be anywhere as good as these but if they make a good film, despite initial earnings it will pave the road for later on successes.

3 • 
Avatar image for wahsobe
Wahsobe

1501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 5

Regardless of what anyone says this is a smart move. It's just too bad the marketing team didn't have this sort of rudimentary insight before it came out. Remind me how much these guys get paid?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sparent180
SParent180

995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@wahsobe: I wonder why they didn't do this from the get go instead of having that ridiculously long tag line of "The fantabulous emancipation of one harley quinn." These companies just overthink things sometimes instead of keeping it simple. Who knows how much of a difference it would have but it certainly couldn't have hurt.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for masterthrall
masterthrall

110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Name change will not be enough me thinks.

5 • 
Avatar image for vega2505
vega2505

202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Suicide Squad was terrible and the only reason to watch it was Margot's ass in those shorts. So a sequel without the shorts has no reason for anyone to go see it.

8 • 
Avatar image for mogan
mogan

19936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

mogan  Moderator

@vega2505: Is this movie actually related to Suicide Squad beyond Margot's Harley being in it? Like, is it supposed to be in the same universe where Suicide Squad happened?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dancingcactus
DancingCactus

292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@mogan: Yes.

This is, at least technically, supposed to be a sequel to suicide squad. I say technically, because Harley is the only character from that movie appearing in this one unless you count nebulous mentions of Leto Joker.

Everything about the branding of this movie was a disaster and the fact it bombed shouldn't surprise anyone. It doesn't matter how good a movie is if the branding and promotion of it make it so no one actually wants to see it.

4 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-6793e8ba0e8bf
deactivated-6793e8ba0e8bf

5517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

The original subtitle was terrible and I find it hard to believe anybody actually referred to it by the whole title. I think most people, that I've noticed, have been calling it Birds of Prey or Harley Quinn. Not sure how much this move is going to help, to be honest. Who knows though...

3 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-64efdf49333c4
deactivated-64efdf49333c4

21783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

@lionheartssj1: I was at the theater just a couple days ago, and I heard people all over the theater calling it the "new Harley Quinn" movie. Nothing else.

2 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-60805f69c9188
deactivated-60805f69c9188

882

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Yeah that’ll drive those ticket sales! 👍

4 • 
Avatar image for srfilk86
srfilk86

768

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

And her huge mug on the original poster didn't get that point across...okay, I guess?

5 • 
Avatar image for mogan
mogan

19936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

mogan  Moderator

That title makes it sound like there are more Harley Quinn movies planned.

Upvote •