GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Blizzard CEO Wants Warcraft 4, Says Smartphone Game Market's Potential Not Realized

"I love that there is so much passion and interest around Warcraft IV."

21 Comments

It's been more than 14 years since Warcraft III came out in 2002. Blizzard CEO Mike Morhaime would like to make Warcraft IV, but stressed in a new interview that it may not happen soon, if ever.

"We love RTS games but right now our focus is still continuing to evolve StarCraft II--and to the extent that MOBA games are RTS--continue supporting and evolving Heroes of the Storm," he told Game Informer in the magazine's December issue, which is out today. "I love that there is so much passion and interest around Warcraft IV. I would love to see Warcraft IV at some point in the future, but that is not our current focus."

No Caption Provided

Reign of Chaos, the subtitle of Warcraft III, was followed by the release of an expansion pack, The Frozen Throne, which launched in 2003 to a positive reception. The game's story has since been continued in Blizzard's MMORPG World of Warcraft, which was released in 2004.

In summer 2015, Blizzard producer Tim Morten said Warcraft IV--and StarCraft III--have not been ruled out, though he made no guarantees of them ever happening.

Also in Game Informer's interview with Morhaime, the executive was asked what other game genre or platform he'd like to make games for in the future. Morhaime teased that Blizzard sees a "huge opportunity" on mobile, where it already has a footing with Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft.

"I think we are always looking at everything. We play a ton of games here, and we're always brainstorming new ideas," he said. "I think that still people haven't really figured out what the killer app for mobile is. I think there's a huge opportunity there. We certainly have so many people with these powerful gaming devices in their pockets that they are walking around with every day. I feel like there's a lot of unexplored ground still."

Another subject that came up in the interview was Blizzard's choice to do away with the Battle.net name. Morhaime said there was "a lot" of internal debate about this. The decision was to sunset in part because the name was "almost competing with [Blizzard's] other main brands," Morhaime said. The executive also said Blizzard has talked about the idea of adding non-Blizzard games to the Blizzard launcher, but the developer decided it was busy enough already with features and capabilities for Blizzard games.

"We ultimately internally decided this is going to be a Blizzard platform and we're going to focus on Blizzard games. There may be a way to leverage that technology with other companies within the Activision Blizzard family, but I think from a branding and consumer-facing perspective, we want to keep the service focused on just the Blizzard games."

The December issue of Game Informer is available to buy now.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 21 comments about this story
21 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for syntaxkt
SyntaxKT

462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

I think the issue with Warcraft 4 is that these games have such a high skill cap and cost 60 dollars to play. Whether you like them or not, Mobas are f2p, lesser micromanagement needed, and make way more money from some people buying skins or early unlocks more than a 50-60 dollar rts (and the expansions) ever would. You also don't get ladder fear as much because you have 4 people on your team so the fear and intensity of losing a 1vs1 game because you don't feel like you are a decent player isn't there. RTS games will still be around in many different forms (total war) but I think Blizzard only wants to invest in games that have the potential to gain a huge audience, like Overwatch, Hearthstone, WoW and to a much lesser extent but f2p, Heroes of the Storm.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Valherran
Valherran

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

I would love a WarCraft 4 that takes the serious tone back of WarCraft 2, no more of that cartoony shit.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for wexorian
wexorian

3228

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 263

User Lists: 0

Edited By wexorian

They can make filler story for WC 4 before legion, or alternate azeroth they have space for ideas.

2 • 
Avatar image for jyml8582
jyml8582

1709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

If they make Warcraft 4 on phones and tablets I will lose my shit.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for aeguvas_basic
aeguvas_basic

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@jyml8582: You mean it will be shit......

3 • 
Avatar image for wexorian
wexorian

3228

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 263

User Lists: 0

@aeguvas_basic: I'm from a future and it's shit!!!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for kaminobenimizu
KamiNoBeniMizu

1831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Mobile has potential, obviously (especially tablets, smartphone screens are small as heck). But it's full of cheap tricks and things. Who the heck has patience to search through hundreds of "Made in China"* apps!?

*:There are legit chinese apps, but they are rare. Most of them are made with stolen arts from popular things. Then, there are the wanna-be copies like Crime Simulator (GTA crappy clone), and other things. I can barely find decent games on mobile. And I've seen HUNDREDS of crappy ones!

It's not that mobile potential has not been noticed, it's just mobile has a bad reputation because of Apple and Google not monitoring what the heck is entering for the sake of money (anyone can pay a fee and upload their crap in there! worst than Steam!).

Upvote • 
Avatar image for edinko
edinko

726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By edinko

@kaminobenimizu: Steam is ok. THere is not that kind of f2p junk. On mobile there is 99.9 percent only that

Upvote • 
Avatar image for kaminobenimizu
KamiNoBeniMizu

1831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@edinko: You're right. But they had idiots abusing of the Earlier Access method instead (put a more or less acceptable product, made people pay, and barely updated it, or in worst cases, never). And they had a few questionable "games" that passed the Greenlight too.

Both of these things were removed, and Valve reinforced their policies on these things. But they still had their moment of crap.

Obviously, this was nothing compared to the poor and abused mobile market. I wonder how is the Amazon store and if they actually have some requirements before people can upload things. I really hope Steam will have a mobile store at some point. Competent developers (indie or not) deserves it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for edinko
edinko

726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@kaminobenimizu: You can now filter out for example EA games on steam on the storefront.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for kaminobenimizu
KamiNoBeniMizu

1831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@edinko: Oh...? Seems nice! I don't use the Steam Store that often, I just browse from time to time (it ain't my account). Good to know, thanks for the update!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for edinko
edinko

726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@kaminobenimizu: Well its new. COmpletelty reworked 2 days ago or so. Check it out. YOu can filter out all the crap you dont want to see.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for chiefwiggum16
chiefwiggum16

2826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

I swear to god if I see a Warcraft 4 go freemium on mobile I may lose my shit.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for straightcur
straightcur

1521

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By straightcur

Love Warcraft, hate WoW. They are not the same genre at all. Make more Warcraft

7 • 
Avatar image for ziltoid
Ziltoid

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Ziltoid

I'm all in for a fourth entry, the third game was an incredible RTS.

3 • 
Avatar image for Pyrosa
Pyrosa

10650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

They're going to need to conclude WoW in order to make a WC4, so we'll just wait.

2 • 
Avatar image for somberfox
somberfox

887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

I don't expect to ever see a Warcraft IV until WoW stops making money.

4 • 
Avatar image for mogan
mogan

19997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

mogan  Moderator

I would also enjoy a Warcraft IV, so long as it wasn't just a Starcraft II clone.

2 • 
Avatar image for snugglebear
snugglebear

5015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

I could see an idle game or something like that on mobile in conjunction with the actual PC game that the fans have been supporting for all these years. Something that gives a few extra coins or a cosmetic unlock or something.

2 •