GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Despite Ubisoft CEO's Objections, Former Activision Owner Buys Even More Shares

Vivendi now owns more than 10 percent of Ubisoft.

70 Comments

Vivendi, the company that once owned Activision Blizzard, has announced the purchase of even more shares in Ubisoft. This comes not long after an internal email from Ubisoft CEO Yves Guillemot described the initial investment, which saw Vivendi buy a 6.6 percent stake in the French game publisher, as "unsolicited and unwelcome."

No Caption Provided

Vivendi announced today that its equity stake in Ubisoft has increased to 10.39 percent, representing a total investment of 244 million Euros, or about $271 million. It also now owns 10.20 percent of Gameloft, up from the 6.2 percent it said that it had acquired earlier this month.

"These investments are part of a strategic vision of operational convergence between Vivendi's content and platforms on one hand and the Ubisoft and Gameloft productions in video games on the other," the company said today. "Vivendi is acting alone, is not in concert with a third party, and has not concluded a temporary sale agreement regarding the Ubisoft and Gameloft shares or voting rights."

The press release goes on to suggest it may continue to buy up more shares of both companies and could eventually seek seats on their respective boards.

Vivendi is the former owner of Activision Blizzard. The company began looking to sell off its majority stake in the publisher in 2012 and eventually did so in 2013. It still owns part of the company, but that figure--roughly 12 percent after the 2013 sale--is now less than six percent.

The sudden interest in Ubisoft and Gameloft hasn't been well received by the two companies. After the initial acquisition, Ubisoft released a public statement saying it had "taken note of the unsolicited action on the part of Vivendi." It also reaffirmed its "intention to remain independent."

This was followed by a leak of the aforementioned Guillemot email, which referenced Vivendi's history of "aggressively pursuing companies within the entertainment sector." Another internal Guillemot email warned of the possibility of the company being "managed by people who don't understand our expertise and what it takes to succeed in this industry."

Despite this, the share price of Ubisoft has increased about 18 percent since Vivendi's initial investment, from 21.39 Euros ($23.77) on October 14 to 25.33 Euros ($28.15) as of this writing.

It's unclear what impact Vivendi's continued acquisition of shares could have on Ubisoft. But considering Ubisoft is among the biggest game publishers in the world, with franchises like Assassin's Creed, Far Cry, and Just Dance under its umbrella, we'll be continuing to monitor this story closely. Ubisoft's quarterly earnings report is due out on November 4, so we'll likely be hearing more then, if not sooner.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 70 comments about this story
70 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
  • 70 results
  • 1
  • 2
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for deactivated-5a803cda1fb41
deactivated-5a803cda1fb41

290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Now Vivendi can turn Ubisoft into Activision, not that they need that much of a push.

2 • 
Avatar image for bobafetthatesu
BobaFettHatesU

2895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I use my shares of Ubi to stock my toilet paper dispenser.

6 • 
Avatar image for gamedelay
GameDelay

223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@bobafetthatesu: I'm confused. Do you have a piece of paper for each share you own? Or do you use the dividends you receive to purchase commercial toilet paper?

The second one makes sense, but isn't much of a statement, and the first one is simply weird in this digital age.

9 • 
Avatar image for MattLambertson
MattLambertson

69

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@gamedelay: you win this thread

3 • 
Avatar image for MJ12-Conspiracy
MJ12-Conspiracy

2984

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 1

R.I.P. Ubisoft......not like they've really endeared themselves to gamers over the last 5 years or so....

2 • 
Avatar image for unreal849
Unreal849

880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

Edited By Unreal849

Gee, I hope this doesn't affect all of Ubisoft's original content! That would be such a shame...

/end sarcasm

Another internal Guillemot email warned of the possibility of the company being "managed by people who don't understand our expertise and what it takes to succeed in this industry."

God forbid, they might make you design games without Uplay integration! The horror!

10 • 
Avatar image for maitkarro
maitkarro

1517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By maitkarro

@unreal849: The horror you have to use steam or origin to play games. The horror you have to use a pc or a console to play a games instead of a mobile phone.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dlCHIEF58
dlCHIEF58

3655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

@unreal849: This is Vivendi we are talking about, who is more inept at managing game companies than those that escaped their grasp (Activision. Blizzard, Harmonix, Sierra, etc). You'd expect more annualizing of franchises, lower production values, and more invasive DRM/microtransactions.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Zerabp
Zerabp

490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@dlCHIEF58: They sold off their Activision shares because of the annualizing actually when vivendi was working with the companies you mentioned is when they were making good games.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for xsonicchaos
xsonicchaos

1389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

@unreal849: You know, it's true, Ubisoft deserves crap and we're justified to laugh at all this... shenanigan. But thinking deeper, when frikin Activision pays hard money for their freedom...

2 • 
Avatar image for Raphy_Turtle
Raphy_Turtle

239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@unreal849: If you think there's too many microtransactions and overpriced season passes already, wait until a significant part of the board becomes comprises of businesses that know nothing of entertainment and its fragile reliance on customer feedback/satisfaction. Given the opportunity they'd turn every major franchise into a free-to-play/pay-to-play hybrid that actually literally hides the whole contents of a game behind paywalls. I'm just speculating but it could be a lot worse.

10 • 
Avatar image for Sohereiam
Sohereiam

892

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Raphy_Turtle: No, you got the whole image of Vivendi.

Ubisoft was bad, but not terrible, if they go all out, they could something great, but Vivendi is a streaming based company, they're the owners of Dailymotion.

2 • 
Avatar image for Zerabp
Zerabp

490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Sohereiam: Vivendi has been around longer than you or me (1853) they have always had a stake in gaming and indeed released games on Atari, Nintendo ETC, they have been in gaming before Ubisoft was a glimmer in it's creators eye. Basically they know the industry as well as if not better than Ubisoft could ever hope to. Considering they sold off their Activision shares mostly because they were against annualizing games and expansions for games.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Raged4Life
Raged4Life

222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Raphy_Turtle: I hope they flood the market and people realize that micro transactions are bad for the consumer.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for unreal849
Unreal849

880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

@Raphy_Turtle: It can always be worse. But Ubi is already bad enough that I don't really care any more.

3 • 
Avatar image for datriax
datriax

584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

lol **** you Ubisoft.

20 • 
  • 70 results
  • 1
  • 2