GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Former Xbox Exec Says Millions Were Spent To Get Games Parity With PS2

Peter Moore says it made sense developers and publishers were in "Sony's pocket" after the DreamCast crashed and the success of the original PlayStation.

6 Comments

It wasn't cheap for Microsoft to carve out space in the gaming industry in the 2000s. Peter Moore, an Xbox executive from 2003-07, recently explained that the company spent millions of dollars just to get third-party games day and date with Sony's systems on Xbox and Xbox 360.

Appearing on the Iron Lords Podcast (spotted by Peter Ovo on Twitter), Moore brought up the challenges going against Sony after the success of the original PlayStation. Basically, it wasn't easy to get games on Xbox initially. "You're writing really big checks at this point to get content," he said. "You don't have an install base you can point to. You have forecasts, if anyone's going to believe them."

That meant, according to Moore, spending $5 million to $20 million to sometimes just get day and date parity with PS2 third-party games. He said developers and publishers in the 2000s were very much in "Sony's pocket" following the aftermath of the Sega DreamCast and original PlayStation.

Last year, Moore explained why Microsoft encouraged the console wars in the 2000s. He believes the competition between Xbox and PlayStation was good for gaming and not about creating divisions.

Moore was at Sega before his time at Microsoft. He claims before leaving the former for Xbox that he told Sonic creator Yuji Naka to "f**k off" after his poor response to a focus group video.

After Xbox, Moore was in a leadership role at EA for almost a decade before leaving the industry to join Liverpool Football Club in 2017. He's since left that position and returned to gaming with a role at Nifty Games.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 6 comments about this story
6 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for Mamba219
Mamba219

406

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

Edited By Mamba219

He did a good job. Xbox went from being a system I had no interest in when it launched to having the best gaming console of the mid-2000s with the Xbox 360. They were truly innovative back then...achievements, better online play, strong support for third-parties, and more. From 2006-2009, the Xbox 360 was a superior console to the PS2/3 in most ways - as long as the red ring of death is forgotten, anyway..

After that it flipped. The PS3 had better games from late 2009 until the end of the seventh generation. In my view, Xbox has never come back.

2 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-65041d1fed7d0
deactivated-65041d1fed7d0

439

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

my ps2 still work after like 15 years but my brother's xbox 360 stopped working after 3 years. have a good day :DDD

3 • 
Avatar image for gamer112696
gamer112696

581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@majikayo666: The equivalent to the PS2 was the original Xbox. And mine is still running since 2001. I think everything was built to last back then however. The 360 had crappy build quality for sure with the red rings. But I still doubt newer systems like the Series X and PS5 will be able to last as long as the PS1, PS2, and original Xbox. Systems are just made to run so hot these days since they try so hard to compete with PC now.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-65041d1fed7d0
deactivated-65041d1fed7d0

439

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@gamer112696: these days its also business strategy to make the product become useless in a few years so people will buy the newer versions. like your xbox 360 stops working so you decide to buy xbox one, not to mention being greedy and doing anything to reduce the cost :DDD

though for me this strategy backfires. since I saw a microsoft product became useless in 3 years I cannot pay for any microsoft device ever again. on the other hand it would sound like sony ad but lots of my sony products still work except my ps1 that it cannot read disc anymore but its expected. I cannot ever buy a product of a company that its product doesn't last long at least for 10 years. but still if I had bought ps5 but it stops working in like 5 years I wouldn't buy any sony product ever again. it's not impossible to develop devices that last very long as long as you are not greedy with the components you use

these days lots of expensive devices like big deal new GPU and motherboards use cheap, not proper electonical compenent therefore they can hardly last for 5 years especially because they generate too much heat but the components not durable even for 40°C for few years of usage. so for products like GPU that can generate upto 100°C heat they use components like they developing calculator lmao

Upvote • 
Avatar image for blackven0m13
BlackVen0m13

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By BlackVen0m13

Kind of feels like developers and publishers are still very much in "Sony's pocket" unless Microsoft buys them…

2 • 
Avatar image for boobytrap
BoobyTrap

716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By BoobyTrap

@blackven0m13: yep, to quote Peter, it’s the exact same issue as 20 years ago, "You don't have an install base you can point to…” LMAO

Upvote •