GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

FTC To Seek Injunction Halting Microsoft-Activision Deal, And The Xbox Company Is Happy About It

Microsoft welcomes an injunction because it would move up the legal process.

5 Comments

The latest chapter in the saga of Microsoft's attempt to buy Activision Blizzard has unfolded. CNBC is reporting that the Federal Trade Commission will file an injunction today, June 12, to try to stop the deal from finalizing before its July 18 deadline.

This would be the FTC's latest action against the deal, following the government group's lawsuit against Microsoft at the end of 2022. A spokesperson for Microsoft told CNBC that an injunction would be good because it would help move the process along faster.

That's because the FTC, as part of its original lawsuit that pre-dates a potential injunction, is trying to have its own administrative law judge make a decision on the case. That process isn't scheduled to begin until August. Microsoft believes in its case (of course), so the company wanting the legal process to get going faster makes sense.

"We welcome the opportunity to present our case in federal court. We believe accelerating the legal process in the U.S. will ultimately bring more choice and competition to the market," Microsoft president Brad Smith said in a statement.

In the UK, the CMA blocked the merger, and both Microsoft and Activision Blizzard are now appealing. The EU, meanwhile, has said the deal can go forward.

The FTC, in its December 2022 complaint, said Activision Blizzard normally releases its games on a variety of devices, but warned "that could change if the deal is allowed to process."

"With control over Activision's blockbuster franchises, Microsoft would have both the means and motive to harm competition by manipulating Activision's pricing, degrading Activision's game quality or player experience on rival consoles and gaming services, changing the terms and timing of access to Activision's content, or withholding content from competitors entirely, resulting in harm to consumers," the FTC said.

For its part, Microsoft has said it will keep Call of Duty on PlayStation if it's allowed to buy Activision Blizzard because the game makes so much money on Sony's console and it would be bad business to remove it. Microsoft has also said it will not degrade game quality for titles released on non-Xbox platforms if its deal is allowed to proceed.

Keep checking back with GameSpot for the latest.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 5 comments about this story
5 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for shadow6323
shadow6323

535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Keep the desperation to j.o Sony going I guess lol

2 • 
Avatar image for dushness
Dushness

1353

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

given the windows/mac issues, the IE issues. what incentive does MS have to try and actually destroy playstation?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for oddshroom
OddShroom

568

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By OddShroom

@dushness: Well they could go after the hardware only, resulting in Playstation sticking to making games and not consoles. Or even better combine the hardware team with xbox and have them put ONE box out they both put games on.

The best hardware feature sof Playstation amd Xbox, and the published games of Playstation, Xbox, and anyone else. Honestly they could both make way more than they both do combined doing it like that, and you're still competing with pc and nintendo. AND each other on software. Pure game competition without all the segregated hardware nonsense.

The Sony and Microsoft X-Station.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for lonewolf1044
lonewolf1044

4986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

@dushness: I do not think MS is out to smash Sony, they may want Sony to buy their games as it adds to MS pot as lunch money. MS is more focused on software now and want customers. For me Sony is the one that can't deal with it.

2 • 
Avatar image for bdrtfm
BDRTFM

6738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

The idea that the people who want to block the deal also get to handpick the Judge to rule on the case is completely absurd. The FTC keeps getting wrecked so they've been stacking the deck the last few years to make sure whatever decision they make is final. Khan also made it so that a quorum of all members agreeing to block a merger is no longer required and that any one single person on the commission can decide to block a merger and the rest have to follow suit. No due process whatsoever. One person decides to block a merger and then their handpicked Judge rules on whether or not it should be blocked. Sounds more like a kangaroo court than a trade commission.

2 •