GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

GameStop Meme Stock Movie Casts Paul Dano, Seth Rogen, Pete Davidson, And Sebastian Stan

The film that chronicles the GameStop short-squeeze situation has found a cast of big na,es.

16 Comments

The GameStop meme stock movie has found its lead actors, and they include some big names. Deadline reports that the movie, which is called Dumb Money, will feature Paul Dano, Seth Rogen, Sebastian Stan, and Pete Davidson. The movie is based on Ben Mezrich's book, The Antisocial Network.

Craig Gillespie (I, Tonya, Cruella) will direct the movie. Filming is expected to begin in October. Mezrich himself confirmed the casting and filming date on Twitter.

As announced previously, the movie tells the story of the GameStop meme stock drama. The company's stock price shot through the roof in 2021 amid a short-squeeze situation, and it became one of the biggest stories in the world of technology and Wall Street. Amid the frenzy, MGM bought the rights to Mezrich's book and announced it was adapting it for a movie.

Gillespie, Rogen, and Stan worked together previously on the Hulu series Pam & Tommy.

As for Mezrich, he previously wrote Bringing Down The House, which was adapted for the 2008 drama 21 starring Kevin Spacey, Jim Sturgess, and Laurence Fishburne. Mezrich's other popular book, The Accidental Billionaires, told the story of the founding of Facebook. It would later be adapted for the Oscar-winning movie The Social Network starring Jesse Eisenberg as Mark Zuckerberg.

In January 2021, GameStop's share price exploded due in part to investors on Reddit's Wall Street Bets subreddit and other forums taking aim at the institutional investors who were "shorting" the stock. This created what's known as a "short squeeze," and GameStop's share price blasted off to record heights.

After trading at under $5 per share, the stock exploded above $500, making some people incredibly wealthy, at least on paper. The company's share price has since fallen back down, trading today at around $27 per share.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 16 comments about this story
16 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for sippio
sippio

2897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Games journalist are always pushing this weird mainstream agenda which is annoying in it's own right.

Is it an ad or an article.

Why can't the author say "why use this annoying dude in something gamers care about"

/smh

Upvote • 
Avatar image for zegaloth
Zegaloth

74

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

A terrible cast for a terrible script.

Paul Dano is cool. Sometimes you gotta take the money check movies so you can do the stuff you want.

2 • 
Avatar image for milhouse91
milhouse91

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Seth Rogen? They couldn't get an actor from the Lifetime network instead?

5 • 
Avatar image for clockworkengine
clockworkengine

586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This is a YouTube video, not a feature film. At least Hollywood is trying to keep up a little bit. Though, they're too slow to produce content to compete with YouTube.

2 • 
Avatar image for chubby170
Chubby170

1823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Sorry, but Pete Davidson is just horrible lol.

Not sure why people seem to be so into him these days.

6 • 
Avatar image for milhouse91
milhouse91

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@chubby170: He was awful on SNL, except when he played himself as Chad.

2 • 
Avatar image for cryonic2099
cryonic2099

102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

When did mediocre comedians become "big names"?

8 • 
Avatar image for stickemup
StickEmUp

2247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

StickEmUp  Online

@cryonic2099: Having talent and being known around the world are two different things. You don’t necessarily need the first one.

2 • 
Avatar image for mogan
mogan

19981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

mogan  Moderator

@cryonic2099: According to the subhead, they're not big names, they're big "na'es". Whatever those are. : p

9 • 
Avatar image for cryonic2099
cryonic2099

102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@mogan: LOL, GS Journos...the gift that keeps on giving

3 • 
Avatar image for quinnd6
quinnd6

956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Hollywood is devoid of ideas. They use something that nobody cares about that happened a couple of years ago to make a movie now. It just illustrates how bad it has gotten. They do everything to actually avoid coming up with anything interesting.

2 • 
Avatar image for illegal_peanut
illegal_peanut

4210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@quinnd6: And the funny part is. If you actually read the news and history. There are literally thousands of stories they're missing to make BS like this.

2 • 
Avatar image for aggressionx
AggressionX

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

The last sentence should be clarified to say $108 per share (split-adjusted) instead of $27. Comparing pre-split prices to post-split prices is misleading at best and disingenuous at worst.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dtobin123
dtobin123

66

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By dtobin123

@aggressionx: Are you kidding? Do you know how many times most stocks have split? Never are their split-adjusted prices given when reporting their price. That's just not how it works, so don't get all feisty because the writer didn't do something that literally no other journalist does or should do.

2 • 
Avatar image for aggressionx
AggressionX

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By AggressionX

@dtobin123: Are *you* kidding? Obviously reporting split-adjusted prices isn't needed when talking about a price at a single point in time, but when making a direct comparison between three points in time ($5 > $500 > $27), it is ABSOLUTELY essential that all prices are normalized ($5 > $500 > $108) or ($1.25 > $125 > $27). It's hilarious that I even need to spell that out for you.

Upvote •