GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

How Netflix's Resident Evil Juggles Video Game Canon With A New Story

With so much established canon in the Resident Evil franchise, Netflix's new adaptation is trying to stick as close to the story as possible.

12 Comments

Adapting a beloved video game into a TV show or movie is tricky. How close can it stick to the game canon? Do you retell events from the games or a new story? Explore existing characters or create fresh faces for the audience to watch? Many have tried and many have failed. Netflix's live-action Resident Evil is the latest attempt at bringing that franchise into the live-action space and, according to GameSpot's review, is more successful than any previous adaptation of the property.

To find out how it managed that, GameSpot spoke with executive producer and showrunner Andrew Dabb, who explained it simply. "The games are our backstory," he said. "So everything that happened up to the point we were released--everything through Village--happened in our world."

That, alone, is certainly comforting to hear, given how all over the place previous iterations have been. Don't get us wrong, we love the Milla Jovovich-led film franchise, but it often has very little to do with the games. Knowing that everything that's happened so far serves as a base for what Dabb and his team are creating is reassuring. That said, he's quick to note that going forward, anything can happen.

He explained, "From that point, things will diverge. So we're gonna go one direction, the games are gonna go their own direction." Still, they could intersect again if we're lucky. Dabb continued, "If we're in season--fingers crossed, knock on wood--five of this show, and the next Resident Evil comes out and there's something awesome in it, we will steal that, please believe that we will. But Capcom has their own plans for the game and how that story moves forward."

With that all in mind, you might be wondering how Albert Wesker, who was killed via a rocket into a volcano in the games, happens to be a major part of this show. Well, Dabb previously addressed that question. "We're very aware that Albert Wesker was blown up in a volcano by a rocket launcher. We've all been there," he said back in May. "There is a very good reason that Wesker is back and it does not come down to the fact that he was wearing lava-and-rocket proof clothes. We're very aware of that and it will be dealt with."

Of course, getting into that "very good reason" will be a spoiler. But rest assured, Dabb is taking care to work within the framework of the games and definitely has a long-term plan for the series. "We have a story mapped out," he said. "I'm not gonna sit here and say, 'Oh, I have a five-season plan. And it's all on a whiteboard somewhere.' But we certainly have a story with a beginning, middle, and end. And we'll hope you have the opportunity to tell it."

Whether or not they get to tell it remains to be seen. Resident Evil premieres July 14 on Netflix. Fingers crossed it'll get renewed for a second season.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 12 comments about this story
12 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for zok12
ZOK12

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Poorly. It does it poorly. It's all just easter eggs.

3 • 
Avatar image for gamerboy100
gamerboy100

1089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

So, I wonder which cliche excuse they will use to justify Wesker's return. Probably something about transferring his mind to another body, which has been done countless times in media.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for johanxavier
JohanXavier

8

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Hmmm, seems getting blown into a volcano has turned Wesker black. Seems to be a lot of that going around nowadays.

5 • 
Avatar image for maltnut
maltnut

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@johanxavier: Why does it matter? His race was never integral to either the story or his character. I can understand it if it's a biopic or actually relevant in some way, but this is a fictional character whose race has never been of narrative or thematic relevance. I'm genuinely curious about why people seem upset about it.

3 • 
Avatar image for johanxavier
JohanXavier

8

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@maltnut: People get upset about this because of hypocrisy. When whitewashing was a common problem in Hollywood, people rightfully complained because it was annoying and at times offensive. So they stopped doing it. But that wasn't enough, people wanted more racial diversity in productions, again not an unreasonable request. There's a problem though in Hollywood, lack of creativity. Genuinely original ideas are far and few between, but something that is in heavy abundance is remakes, reboots, and adaptations into movies and TV shows. Any lazy writer can copy something. So what do they do, cast PoC into roles or characters that were originally white. Now we have a new problem, "blackwashing". Also "Femwashing" is starting to happen more where male roles and characters are being assigned to female characters. People are getting upset because somehow something that was a problem has now suddenly no longer become a problem. What was once annoying and offensive is now acceptable and encouraged.

I'm genuinely curious how some people aren't upset about it. Unless you weren't bothered by whitewashing.

2 • 
Avatar image for atomaweapon
atomaweapon

81

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By atomaweapon

@johanxavier: who the heck white washed? having more white leads isn't white washing. The population is still 70 to 80% white versus "POCS"

Now a days they black wash canon characters to fit agendas. So many old and new roles Reddik could have had yet they made him Wesker - a white blonde, blue eyed dude.

It's all one big joke and modern entertainment is trash

Upvote • 
Avatar image for maltnut
maltnut

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@johanxavier: I'm actually not bothered by "whitewashing" either, unless, as I stated before, the race (or gender) was in some way relevant to the character or narrative. Wesker's race has never had relevance to either the overall story or his character arc.

2 • 
Avatar image for atomaweapon
atomaweapon

81

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@maltnut: dude you could literally say that about almost any character in history. RE had all white characters for 30 freaking years. SO what? Make a new role for black characters if you want black characters. It's all so tiring

Upvote • 
Avatar image for maltnut
maltnut

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@atomaweapon: If it doesn't matter why do you let it bother you so much?

3 • 
Avatar image for johanxavier
JohanXavier

8

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@maltnut: Well that does help explain your confusion with people's frustration. I do agree that if it's not relevant to the story, race shouldn't be an issue and if Hollywood agreed with that sentiment as well, we wouldn't have a problem, but they don't agree with that. If we changed a black character to a white character that again had no relevance to the story, people would be upset. Worse so anger would only be the beginning. They would call for the movie to be shelved, demand firings, and demand a public apology or recast them and reshoot every scene.

People who are vocally angry about this kind of stuff are not racist or sexist, they're genuinely upset about the double-standards. Can you imagine getting pulled over for speeding by a cop and while they're giving you a ticket a dozen other people speed by and the cop doesn't even bat an eye at them and looks the other way? That would upset you wouldn't it?

3 • 
Avatar image for bluestorm83
bluestorm83

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@johanxavier: I'm usually bothered by any needless alterations to any character's identity. To me, if you're going to do it, you need to be creating a parallel universe setting, which this actually IS, it's not the Main Resident Evil Continuity... and you also need to bring in an actor who I greatly enjoy. Sam Jackson as Nick Fury was a great choice, and now in canon there are two equal and awesome Nick Furys. Lance Reddick, I loved everything I've seen him in (How great was Fringe? Seriously, how damn great was Fringe???) so even though I think this show is shitty, I think that Lance's Wesker is pretty great.

It's just a new continuity. And I hope that the show somehow greatly improves and that he can not be the only thing it's got going for it. 'Cause I think he's awesome.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for johanxavier
JohanXavier

8

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By JohanXavier

@bluestorm83: I agree that the actor has to be awesome. I love Sam Jackson in everything and he is now Nick Fury. I haven't watched Fringe, but I did like Reddick in the John Wick movies, and like I said originally I didn't have a problem with it so much as the double-standard that came along with it. "Stop doing that, only we can do that"

Upvote •