GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

JK Rowling Apologizes For Killing Snape

"Please don't start flame wars over it..."

58 Comments

May 2 is a big day in the Harry Potter universe, as it's the day that the Battle of Hogwarts took place. Author JK Rowling marks the day each year by apologizing for the death of a character from the series.

Last year, it was Remus Lupin. This year, it's an even more prominent character: Severus Snape. "OK, here it is," Rowling said on Twitter. "Please don't start flame wars over it, but this year I'd like to apologise for killing (whispers)... Snape. *runs for cover*"

Snape, a former Death Eater and professor at Hogwarts, is one of the more interesting and compelling characters from across the Harry Potter series. He made things rough for Harry at school, but he did save his life ultimately and played a very important role in defeating Voldemort.

Harry named one of his children, Albus Severus, after Snape.

In 2015, Rowling apologized for killing Fred Weasley during the Battle of Hogwarts. "Fred was the worst for me, so I started with him," she said about her plan to mark the battle's anniversary every year by recalling a character's death.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 58 comments about this story
58 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
  • 58 results
  • 1
  • 2
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for PrpleTrtleBuBum
PrpleTrtleBuBum

3845

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

I came here expecting JK to confess that she caused Rickman's death.

2 • 
Avatar image for M_T_Mabowels
M_T_Mabowels

134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@PrpleTrtleBuBum: LOL!!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Person4
Person4

181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Typical Eddie post. Youre really bad at what you do, man. You gotta find something else. I want to come to GAMEspot for GAME related things, not articles about spoilers from a book that came out decade ago. This is like going to the Weather Network website to find out what the weather is going to be like, only to come across an article about Han shooting first.

2 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5bd1e31726b43
deactivated-5bd1e31726b43

1081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

Hahaha holy shit people if you have not read the books or seen the movies by now it's your own damn fault. Don't get mad at Eddie for reporting news and revealing a 10 year old "spoiler". By the way Bruce Willis is really dead the whole time in The Sixth Sense. Get over it

2 • 
Avatar image for kaminobenimizu
KamiNoBeniMizu

1831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Legend_of_Link: Darth Vader is Luke's father.

In reality, he is a scorpion in disguise.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for biggamerdude
BigGamerDude

2073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

Edited By BigGamerDude

you screwed up eddie

Upvote • 
Avatar image for TenraiSenshi
TenraiSenshi

316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

It's at times like this that I seriously believe users should have the ability to flag articles, in this case for blatant spoilers. A spoiler alert would have simply been polite, but the fact that the spoiler appears not only on the article but also on the post title on the front page makes it very distasteful.

GameSpot, you seriously need to do some quality control here and stop letting your writers do whatever they like in their shameless hunt for clicks. This is quite disgraceful.

6 • 
Avatar image for Bamda
Bamda

924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

@TenraiSenshi: You need to get our yourself. You're a joke.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for TenraiSenshi
TenraiSenshi

316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Bamda: What? For submitting a relevant criticism of bad practices on a site where the quality of news continues to sink further into obscurity? Lol, okay. XD

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Bamda
Bamda

924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

@TenraiSenshi: The criticism is that your post is a joke. There is no spoiler in that article and you need to get over yourself. You act like some childish troll when you do that.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for TenraiSenshi
TenraiSenshi

316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By TenraiSenshi

@Bamda: So revealing the death of a major character is not a spoiler? How do you reckon that?

To be honest, you're the one acting like a troll right now.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Bamda
Bamda

924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

@TenraiSenshi: The movie was about 6 years ago. The books even longer. Not sure how long you expect others to not discuss it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for TenraiSenshi
TenraiSenshi

316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By TenraiSenshi

@Bamda: Just because a story has existed for a while, that doesn't mean everyone has seen or read it. In fact, if you were to compare the amount of people the movies reached, to the overall population that has access to media in some form or another, I'd bet you'd find the overall percentage of those who have actually watched the movies or read the books is relatively low in the grand scheme of things.

There are lots of older, more well known stories that I have still not read, or seen movies for. I wouldn't want to be blatantly spoiled for them any more than I'm sure others would want to be in this particular case. In fact in this very thread you see a number of people complaining about it. Are you going to overlook that in your effort to justify your own views? You're being unrealistic if you expect that just because something was popular, it means EVERYONE must know what happened by now.

And even then, I actually have no issue with people discussing it, or reporting on it. Hell, I don't even have an issue with spoilers, so long as there is some sort of warning for them. The author for this post could have easily removed the reveal from the title of the article on the front page, put a spoiler warning and simply discussed the spoiler in the article itself. Then I'd gladly say if people still read it after all that, that it was their own fault and they can't complain if they were spoiled. But the author did not even have the integrity to do something so simple, which could have easily avoided any potential issues for a lot of readers. That to me just shows a lack of care or respect for the readers.

If you don't like that I put words to my distaste in that regard, too bad, but it doesn't make what I am saying any less relevant.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for SwatterXX
SwatterXX

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

"Hey guys, I want to stay relevant. Sorry for killing ______."

"Oh hello again guys. Sorry I should have made Harry and the main chick fall in love."

"Oh what are you guys doing here. Well since you're here, my books guys. You member them? I member."

6 • 
Avatar image for Poodger
Poodger

1275

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Poodger

@SwatterXX: The only thing more cringey than that is quoting the member berries, probably the lamest and most cringe worthy thing South Park has ever done

Upvote • 
Avatar image for dvdjedi
dvdjedi

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@SwatterXX:

So salty. Her books made her a billion dollars so I'm sure she's content with how things are going these days.

4 • 
Avatar image for uubershikamarux
uubershikamarux

326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Albus severus what a terrible fan fiction name

3 • 
Avatar image for DARREN636
DARREN636

958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

where's the apology for fantastic beasts

also

what a cynical tweet.

2 • 
Avatar image for snake33303
snake33303

60

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@DARREN636: why apologize for a good film?

3 • 
Avatar image for ragnarocking
Ragnarocking

545

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Get the f**k outta here with these spoilers in the title.

11 • 
Avatar image for Doomerang
Doomerang

293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Wow eddie, that spoiler title is a dick move.

16 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-67e6993e92427
deactivated-67e6993e92427

1095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Doomerang: It's the dickest of moves because your only real defense against title spoilers is to not visit the site anymore. This is the second time in a week that they've ruined a movie for me.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for kaminobenimizu
KamiNoBeniMizu

1831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Doomerang: -Mara was here-

2 • 
Avatar image for Doomerang
Doomerang

293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Doomerang

@kaminobenimizu: Ha-HA! SMT Reference </phil sebbin>

Upvote • 
Avatar image for pack_l3ader
pack_l3ader

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

That headline is not fucking cool. I wanted to get into the series and started to read the books. And just puting a huge spoiler about a book on the front page of your video game website is not cool.

11 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5bd1e31726b43
deactivated-5bd1e31726b43

1081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

@pack_l3ader: read The Name of The Wind . It will be one of the best fantasy books you will ever read.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for gleencross
GleenCross

1112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@pack_l3ader: That's maybe a positive. Try something else dude. Harry Potter has 5 thousand pages of nothingness, there is no literary valour, zero. Maybe cheap entertainment, but with the limitless potential of the internet, why waste time with a insipid book?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for MabinogiFan
MabinogiFan

44

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@gleencross: The "limitless potential of the internet"? What are you even talking about?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for gleencross
GleenCross

1112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@MabinogiFan: Is it not obvious? Why you be limited by a popular work if you have access to something unknow with more potential. There's no reason to be brainwashed anymore nowadays.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for snake33303
snake33303

60

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By snake33303

@gleencross: get a load of this guy

2 • 
Avatar image for Xylymphydyte
Xylymphydyte

1737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@pack_l3ader: Vader is Luke's father.

7 • 
Avatar image for gleencross
GleenCross

1112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By GleenCross

Not one of the more interesting and compelling characters, the only interesting character tbh. Harry Potter is a very simplistic, underwhelming work of fiction that is very accessible, hence the former popularity. It was the first interaction on english literature for many kids back in the day, so there was zero sense of paradigms and standards. Especially outside UK, HP was a huge hit in unusual places like south-america, not even Lord of the Rings had this kind of influence. I honestly feel ashamed to remember my childhood, to be "impressed" with such simpleton writing and character development, the constant repetition of themes and scenarios. As a adult, after hundreds of books and a proper established taste and mentality, Harry Potter feels like horse shit to me. It's sad to see people still worshiping crap, the latest movie is a CGi fuckfest, even more exaggerated than Hobbit or the recent Alice series. It's one of those cases that reinforces the sentiment: Popularity ≠ Quality.

7 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-67e6993e92427
deactivated-67e6993e92427

1095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@gleencross: I remember going through that phase, where I felt I had discovered true art and knew that everything I had once loved was inferior. For me it was music, but a form of that sentiment exists in every medium. The good news is that you'll probably grow out of it.

2 • 
Avatar image for skippert
skippert

976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

@gleencross: Kids will continue to be fooled and enjoy those books regardless of your personal opinion. You are forgetting that this book is written for a target audience. Everyone gets older and learns of new experiences and books you may have read in the past may no longer be as relevant to you as they used to be. Its way too easy to bash something and write it of as simpleton writing. You are probably better of spending your energy on new experiences instead of looking back in such a sour fashion.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-602ba4c72cdea
deactivated-602ba4c72cdea

632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@gleencross: You sound like you're in your late teens early 20s. Once you've (legitimately) matured you'll recognize and appreciate simpler but well crafted stories like Harry Potter for what they are, without feeling the need to disparage them to feel cool and edgy.

I liked the Goosebumps series when I was a kid, but I don't look back and feel ashamed or feel the need to disparage them because I've matured and advanced sooooo much as a reader and how could anyone possibly be entertained by its simpleton and overrated writing. I recognize and appreciate them for what they are and move on with my life.

When you become an actual adult, not just a legal aged one, you'll understand what I'm telling you, and that shame you feel for ever having enjoyed Harry Potter will be how you feel about the douchey attitude you display with comments like this.

9 • 
Avatar image for gleencross
GleenCross

1112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By GleenCross

@boardsport311: I'm just being honest. Harry Potter literally "fooled" a lot of kids. My scenario is simple to understand: I'm brazilian, back in the early 00's we didn't had too many options, the british literature exposure was non existent, no internet either. Harry Potter came up like a hurricane, it was the only book, also the only example of a fantastical universe far different from what we where accostumed with. If I had the capacity to chose, do you think I would accept the Harry Potter brainwashing instead of being exposed to Neil Gaiman or Tolkien? I didn't even knew Gaiman existed, I was 5 years old, lol That's why I feel ashamed. I'm not on a high horse or something like that, I just think I wasted money and hours of my life reading a idiotic, witless tale.

And I highly respect well crafted stories, doesn't matter if they are "simple" or "complex" to my taste. HP is far to be well crafted, really far. The world building is a blatant copy of past works (remember Gaiman? The books of magic rings a bell?), plenty of plot holes, plenty of reused concepts and repeated structures. The woman even dared to use time travel. She is incapable to develop a simple character arc, but she tried time fucking travel. Then cheap deaths just for shock value. She is so bad, so limited. When you see her trying more rugged literary concepts, it's basically an insult. When you see a piss-poor writer like JK having all this exposition (fooling imature readers even to this day) and good writers like Lev Grossman are forgotten in the corner, how do you think any capable reader feels in a scenario like this?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for OtherVulpe
OtherVulpe

59

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By OtherVulpe

@gleencross: Again, it's nothing other than your preferences. Here in the UK, we had the writers you mentioned right as they first came along, long before JK Rowling hit the scene, but readers adored Harry Potter nonetheless. The reason why is obvious - the goings-on, characters, and atmosphere of those books spoke to readers as children so much more than the likes of Tolkein did, even if Lord of the Rings' world is "deeper" (and yes, I know people who much prefer Harry Potter over Lord of the Rings, who are just as "well-read" as yourself). There is merit to the HP books that, when equally weighed against other stories, won out in terms of enjoyability.

The existence of writers who've tackled deeper worlds changes nothing. Winnie the Pooh doesn't become trite just because readers can grow up and read Animal Farm. You've got to learn to accept that your tastes are subjective, and just because you don't see value in Harry Potter doesn't mean other readers and writers - even better-read than you - can't themselves.

3 • 
Avatar image for Hak
Hak

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Hak

@OtherVulpe: I disagree. While we've had writers like Gaiman, Pratchett, Rankin (Robert and Iain) and many others, our education system actually works to stigmatise reading. At school, from the age of 5 - 18, we're given some of the most banal, uninteresting crap to study and try to find meaning in. It puts many people off reading for the rest of their lives. Harry Potter was equally as banal, and was even more poorly written than the Tom Brown's School Days books which it blatantly ripped off, and its success was probably more to do with people feeling "comfortable" reading it - they didn't need a dictionary to look up the long words, or (like in LoTR) an appendix explaining the world the books are set in.

Gaiman and Pratchett produced some of the finest literature of the 20th century and early 21st. Yet their books were seen as "geeky" and only read by "nerds", because the education system punishes those that think outside the box in regards to their reading material. Gaiman is finding more acceptance due to the movies and TV shows based on his work, though that was originally more to do with his children's books than his "mature reader" books, but asking someone who tells you they're a Gaiman fan what they thought of the differences between the Stardust movie and book will often get you blank stares. Don't even start me on how many people think that Pratchett was just a bumbling old man writing screenplays for Sky TV...

So while I agree that age should be no barrier for a well crafted story, the Harry Potter books weren't well crafted, and were some of the most derivative crap. They were the equivalent of New Kids On The Block - safe, easily marketed, but not really representative of the potential in music that actually exists, and incomparable to the actual musicians like Zappa or David Bowie.

2 • 
Avatar image for OtherVulpe
OtherVulpe

59

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Hak: I have to disagree with this in turn. Yes, school reading was utterly banal, but the same can't be said for Harry Potter if it succeeded in being interesting to children where those books failed. And it's not as if more serious fantasy stories hadn't already set a standard - Lord of the Rings and Narnia were well known and beloved by the time Harry Potter came along, so HP was able to be judged by young readers and adults in comparison to them.

Simplicity really isn't a sign of bad writing when it's the point. Pokemon is a very simple series of video games, but people don't despise it now because Dark Souls and Dwarf Fortress have since offered something far more in depth - even adults enjoy Pokemon alongside those things. If something is created purely for fun, it doesn't need to be as "deep" as it's competition.

2 • 
Avatar image for gleencross
GleenCross

1112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@OtherVulpe: You are mixing up simplicity with structure. An easier to read book is not something negative, but if the story is equally simple, how can you defend that? Pokemon is easy to play, it uses real life animals and objects to design the monsters for natural connection, obvious nomenclatures and so on... But the game is a well structured rpg. I personally hate pokemon games and every "monsters" derivatives (digimon, monster hunter, etc), but I understand the appeal, I understand that there's a smart game beneath the moronic, childish designs and constant repetitions. But that's not the case of Harry Potter, there's nothing within the structure, no value whatsoever. Like I said, it's a fucking waste of time. 7 books that circles around the same themes, same structure, no character development, no character relation either (only Snape's devotion is kinda acceptable, everyone else feels like robots). Why whould you recommend this piece of shit to anyone? Because it's easy to read, it has entertainment value? There millions of multiple media out there that can serve the same exact purpose: flat entertainment. To read Harry Potter nowadays? jeez.. Maybe if a person read it in a different language as a form of study, that can be benefitial. Other than that, I see no literary value, none. The fact JK extended this shit to 7 books and beyond raises even more red flags.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for OtherVulpe
OtherVulpe

59

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@gleencross: I disagree.What you seem to think is that complexity is key, when added layers to a story don't always necessarily add to the experience. To give another video game example, compare Final fantasy XII to prior entries. Although XII was my personal favourite story, many others disliked it for over-emphasising the political aspect of the Evil Empire, its members, its enemies, and the world's people. A major criticism was that it bogged down the pacing and added too many background goings-on that choked up the story. The added depth, in many players' eyes, did not add to the experience and was superfluous.

You keep saying there's "nothing" there, but you never explain what that even means. Each book revolves around a given mystery in Hogwarts - the Philosopher's Stone theft, the goings-on within the Chamber of Secrets, etc. - so it's hardly a case of "nothing". Saying it has the same themes is a nonsensical criticism too - it's 7 entries in an on-going story; of course the themes will remain. Lord of the Rings, Wheel of Time, Song of Ice and Fire, to name a few examples, also retain their themes throughout their stories. As for the characters, there are no shortage of scenes where characters fall out, are befriended, show strength and weakness, and show sides to themselves that aren't to be expected. But again, these are children's books - you cant expect them to explore these aspects in the same ratio as books written for adults, so trying to even compare them on that level is simply unfair.

I'll go back to Wheel of Time as an example again. A story that I like, but should I call Rand a terrible character because his arc involves madness and trying to lead and defend the world? It's hardly relatable - most readers will never connect with becoming a world leader or going mad. But no, his actions are intriguing nonetheless. Meanwhile, Harry Potter is easily relatable to children - being bullied, getting shunned, wishing for an escape, and exploring what's around him as he gets one. Considering this, I could imagine why some would consider Harry Potter a greater main character than Rand al'Thor, even if I personally disagree. What's more, the Wheel of Time is 14 books long, and themes from Book 1 are just as relevant in Book 14. That doesn't mean they're not still interesting. But I could forgive a reader for preferring Harry Potter because its continued exploration of its themes are more jovial, humorous, or whimsical.

And that's where I think you have it wrong. You've decided that your tastes have "improved", and so you've blocked out what merits Harry Potter has - the merits that actually got kids interested in reading again, where other authors failed to achieve it - because you insist on being overly-analytical and distant from what speaks to younger readers on their level, so you mistake objectivity for subjectivity. To really emphasise this, you say Pokemon has depth hidden beneath the surface, but it would be all too easy for anyone to say they effortlessly breezed through the main games and found a few easy set-ups for simplifying PvP.

3 • 
Avatar image for adayinverse
adayinverse

190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@OtherVulpe: You killed it, sir. Bravo.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for OtherVulpe
OtherVulpe

59

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By OtherVulpe

@gleencross: Oh, so we're doing that thing now where we try and impress everyone else with our "superior tastes", over the topic of magical children's stories? Calling it crap is utter nonsense - you're speaking as if Harry Potter was meant to be some deep, revolutionary work of fiction, when all it was ever meant to be was simple entertainment, and that it succeeded at being, unquestionably. If it was a series that succeeded in capturing the minds and imaginations of young readers and adult alike, in a world full of similar stories to choose from, then it clearly has merit. Your stuck-up attitude is utterly subjective, and I say this as someone who doesn't even care much for the series. The likes of Steven King have even called JK Rowling their favourite author, so please, go ride your high horse somewhere else where you can be "so deeply ashamed" for having liked something that actually is pretty damn good. Seeing people try to act as smarmy and holier-than-thou over these things is repelling. Let people have their fun.

3 • 
Avatar image for oddsnake
Oddsnake

202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

She should have apologized for killing Moody in such a lame way. He deserved better. One of the, if not THE greatest auror, just gets offed basically offpage? That was an insult.

Upvote • 
  • 58 results
  • 1
  • 2