GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Microsoft Is Undermining Activision's Independence With Latest Layoffs, FTC Says

Microsoft contradicted its own representations of what would happen post-merger, the FTC says.

20 Comments

Microsoft's recent announcement of 1,900 layoffs within its Xbox division, including Activision Blizzard employees who joined Microsoft with the buyout, has prompted the United States government to call Microsoft out. The US' Federal Trade Commission (FTC) said in a memo (via The Verge) that the layoff plan "contradicts" how Microsoft represented itself in its proceedings to get the deal done in the first place.

Microsoft's $74.5 billion deal to buy Activision Blizzard is already done, but the FTC said it is trying to temporarily pause the buyout pending the FTC's judgment of it on antitrust merits.

"Microsoft's recently reported plan to eliminate 1,900 jobs in its video game division, including in its newly acquired Activision unit, contradicts the foregoing representations it made to this court," FTC counsel Imad D. Abyad said.

In its own announcement detailing the layoffs, Microsoft said it was making cuts in "areas of overlap" that existed between Microsoft and Activision Blizzard. The FTC said this is "inconsistent with Microsoft's suggestion to this court that the two companies will operate independently post-merger."

Microsoft's recent round of 1,900 layoffs impacted developers and staff from across Activision Blizzard, as well as roles that existed within Microsoft. The Xbox team at Microsoft had around 22,000 employees prior to the cuts.

A spokesperson for Microsoft told GameSpot that the FTC is ignoring reality.

"In continuing its opposition to the deal, the FTC ignores the reality that the deal itself has substantially changed," a representative said. "Since the FTC lost in court last July, Microsoft was required by the UK competition authority to restructure the acquisition globally and therefore did not acquire the cloud streaming rights to Activision Blizzard games in the United States. Additionally, Sony and Microsoft signed a binding agreement to keep Call of Duty on PlayStation on even better terms than Sony had before."

In other Xbox news, it's been reported that Microsoft is considering bringing some of its games, including Starfield, Indiana Jones and the Great Circle, and Gears of War, to PlayStation and Nintendo. This is not yet confirmed, but the company has said it will share more details soon.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 20 comments about this story
20 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for bdrtfm
BDRTFM

6738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By BDRTFM

If the FTC actually believed these massive companies would merge without trimming off the fat in the form of redundant staff, something that has happened in every merger ever, its no wonder they lose so many cases and get called out as nothing but a money pit. Not sure its any of their business to begin with. Misrepresenting themselves in the courtroom would mean that Microsoft said there would be no layoffs of any kind anywhere. Highly doubt they said anything like that. But if they did, why doesn't the FTC say what these misrepresentations are?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sladakrobot
sladakrobot

11910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

FTC is great at wasting taxpayers money.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

8028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By jenovaschilld

The Activision deal was worth $75 billion during the pandemic, but now that people have returned to work, kids back to school, and Act/Blizz IPs have poorly performed, that deal 2.5 yrs ago is now worth 1/2 that maybe 2/3 rds that, if being generous. MS gaming's needs to shed these jobs and tighten up their IPs in order to keep their stock value. (not talking about MS) but it is a 3 trillion $$$ valuated corp that needs to show investors they are strong. Because the stock market is all about perception, and barely about performance.

Nothing makes investors happier then seeing jobs cut, because that is one less credit of outgoing money. And the FTC should look into this, after all, dropping tons of jobs just to appease the stock value with its investors is regulated for a reason. They are just gaming the system, and not allowing true winners and losers. If you make a poor decision, then a stock needs to fail as much as a good decision means you should win. Disrupting tons of workers lives, is not healthy on any economy. Or the people, these corporations should be serving.

7 • 
Avatar image for sladakrobot
sladakrobot

11910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@jenovaschilld: Thats not FTCs job.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for mediastupid1
mediastupid1

486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

xbox is the new sega.

5 • 
Avatar image for sladakrobot
sladakrobot

11910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@mediastupid1: wear your name with pride

3 • 
Avatar image for mediastupid1
mediastupid1

486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@sladakrobot: sorry for the truth.I know it hurts.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sgtkeebler
sgtkeebler

210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

Microsoft laid to waste Activision/Blizzard. I have heard and read that Microsoft's decision to lay off that many people will effect all future titles development time, so be prepared for more buggier games.

2 • 
Avatar image for girlusocrazy
GirlUSoCrazy

5000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Was it an internal Activision decision or an MS decision?

2 • 
Avatar image for m4a5
m4a5

3289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

What a waste of taxpayer money these people are...

5 • 
Avatar image for Vodoo
Vodoo

3881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

OMG... Give it up already! Is MS not allowed to structure their own company the way they see fit? You don't need multiple people that do the same thing. This has nothing to do with how they "represented" themselves.

4 • 
Avatar image for gamespotter_198
gamespotter_198

188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

@Vodoo: yes MS is allowed to structure its acquisitions however it wants to. But this deal created a major monopoly or at least made MS a bigger monolith than it already was having acquired Bethesda too.

There were valid concerns that the acquisition would create an anti-competitive market and is removing choice for consumers, like MS deciding that all Activision can only be played on Xbox or PC, for example. They made counter-arguments that Activision would operate as its own and that consumer's choice will be protected.

Well, MS cleverly laid off people in the Xbox division and not in Activision I suppose, so I don't know if the FTC has a case here. I don't know the exact representations MS made in court to allay FTC's concerns.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for bdrtfm
BDRTFM

6738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@gamespotter_198: They have no case. Laying people off is not anti-competition in any sense of the term and the FTC has no say in who a company hires, fires or lays off.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for strangedr
StrangeDr

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@Vodoo: if someone perjurs themselves there are consequences.

4 • 
Avatar image for sgtkeebler
sgtkeebler

210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

@Vodoo: It kind of does because there was no way this deal was going to go through in the EU and the FTC was fighting to not have it go through here. So the way Microsoft represented themselves in court had all the reason why this merger went through.

9 • 
Avatar image for bdrtfm
BDRTFM

6738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@sgtkeebler: Did Microsoft say that if they merge that there would be zero layoffs at Microsoft or Activision?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sgtkeebler
sgtkeebler

210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

Edited By sgtkeebler

@bdrtfm: According to Microsoft in the courts, FTC, and what they told the EU that they would remain independent. So laying off people because there is "overlap" with other positions already in Microsoft is not being independent. It is just a way for a 3 trillion dollar company to save money.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for bdrtfm
BDRTFM

6738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@sgtkeebler: No company can merge with another company and be completely independent. There is no way a company is going to have multiple people doing the same job that only requires one person. They also changed the deal to get the EUs approval and those changes happened after much of the FTC battle took place. Microsoft had to make changes to their strategy to deal with the changes to the original deal. That's not misrepresentation. That's just things not going as originally planned. The FTC knows this and are just being sore losers because the US Congress hasn't been very happy with them for some time now.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sgtkeebler
sgtkeebler

210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

Edited By sgtkeebler

@bdrtfm: maybe you should go read the actual court documents on what Microsoft claimed because I completely agree with the ftc. When you say “congress isn’t happy” you just mean the lunatics on the right

Upvote •