GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Nintendo, Blizzard, Ubi Montreal top game devs

Japanese, Californian, and Quebecois shops ranked as most powerful studios by Game Developer magazine; Rockstar North, EA Canada, Konami, Valve, Epic, EA Tiburon, and Treyarch round out top 10.

91 Comments

Acclaim often comes to individual games, but the developers of those games often go unnoticed. However, a study published today might give due praise to the game industry's best developers. The industry trade periodical Game Developer released a study titled "Top 50 Developers 2009," a follow-up to its inaugural study in 2008. In the report, the magazine named Nintendo's Kyoto studio, Blizzard Entertainment, and Ubisoft Montreal as this year's best developers.

Blizzard isn't quite the king of the throne, but the regicide of Nintendo might be a possibility in the coming years.
Blizzard isn't quite the king of the throne, but the regicide of Nintendo might be a possibility in the coming years.

According to Game Developer's online sibling, Gamasutra, Nintendo was named 2009's best developer due to its "incredibly strong sales and high industry reputation." The past year saw the Shigeru Miyamoto-led studio release smash hits like the workout title Wii Fit and the cartoony racer Mario Kart Wii, which have sold 18.2 million and 15.4 million units worldwide, respectively. The site also lauded the company for Wii Play and the puzzle game Brain Age.

Second place went to Blizzard, namely for the commercial and critical success of its latest massively multiplayer online role-playing game expansion, World of Warcraft: Wrath of the Lich King, which sold 2.8 million copies a day after its release. Last year, its second expansion pack to its World of Warcraft series won GameSpot's 2008 Editors' Choice award. On Game Developer's 2008 top-developer list, Blizzard was ranked third, behind Infinity Ward, the developer of the critically acclaimed shooter Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. Since the developer did not release any games in 2008, it was not eligible for ranking this year.

Rounding out the top three is Ubisoft's studio in Quebec's biggest metropolis. Buoyed by critical and commercial hits such as Far Cry 2, Rainbow Six Vegas 2, and the cel-shaded Prince of Persia reboot, the company shot up nine places after finishing 12th last year.

Game Developer's rankings were based on the retail performance of games in the US, UK, and Japan and their average scores on review aggregator Metacritic. (Metacritic is owned by GameSpot parent company CBS.) Gamasutra also released an anonymous survey that asked community members to rate game developers on reputation.

DEVELOPER - TITLES
1) Nintendo Kyoto studio - Mario Kart Wii, Wii Fit
2) Blizzard Entertainment - World Of Warcraft: Wrath of the Lich King
3) Ubisoft Montreal - Far Cry 2, Prince of Persia
4) Rockstar North - Grand Theft Auto IV
5) EA Canada - FIFA Soccer 09, NHL 09
6) Konami Tokyo studio - Pro Evolution Soccer 2009, Castlevania: Order of Ecclesia
7) Valve - Left 4 Dead
8) Epic Games - Gears of War 2, Unreal Tournament 3 (Xbox 360)
9) Electronic Arts Tiburon - Madden NFL 09, NASCAR 09
10) Treyarch - Call of Duty: World at War
11) HAL Laboratory - Super Smash Bros. Brawl, Pokemon Ranger: Shadows of Almia
12) Capcom Osaka studio - Devil May Cry 4, Monster Hunter Freedom Unite
13) Traveller's Tales - Lego Batman, Lego Indiana Jones
14) Bethesda Game Studios - Fallout 3
15) Insomniac Games - Resistance 2, Ratchet & Clank Future: Quest for Booty
16) Namco Bandai Games Tokyo studio - Soul Calibur IV, We Ski
17) EA Redwood Shores - Dead Space, MySins
18) Koei Yokohama studio - Romance of the Three Kingdoms XI, G1 Jockey 4 2008
19) Kojima Productions - Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots
20) Harmonix Music Systems - Rock Band 2

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 91 comments about this story
91 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
  • 91 results
  • 1
  • 2
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for vegan_cannibal
vegan_cannibal

244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Bethesda is no 14??????

Upvote • 
Avatar image for biokrysty
biokrysty

1278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

bulls,,,,,,it

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Sonicplys
Sonicplys

2620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Nintendo is number 1....again. Why im I not suprised. Wii tha BEST!!!!!! listen!!!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for railroberto2007
railroberto2007

1405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

probably because infinity ward didnt have a new game in 2008 lol. cod4 was 2007 lol

Upvote • 
Avatar image for titanviper2000
titanviper2000

46

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

How did Treyarch make this list and Infinity Ward got nixed? That makes no sense to me.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for beny_pimpster
beny_pimpster

697

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

yay ea canada bested valve wooooooooooo!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for drand24
drand24

49

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Harmonix should be higher then that.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for JrSlacker
JrSlacker

194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I don't know about Nintendo being the "kings" anymore. I used to smile with glee every time they came out with some new and epic, but that of course was with the Nintendo 64 and such, even the Gamecube had some games that really shined, such as Pikmen. I just find them really predictable, and the E3 some what proved that.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for snokdruid
snokdruid

260

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

im not suprised to see blizzard up there

Upvote • 
Avatar image for rikhan_z
rikhan_z

3410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

SquareEnix? :S

Upvote • 
Avatar image for liam72
liam72

374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@xXFr34k_0uTXx Yes, there is certainly a link between sales, historics and game quality, but it isn't strong enough to point out one specific developper as the leader in all of those spheres. Games made in 1996 have a slight impact on today's sell and bad games can end up being "best sellers" if the marketing is good enough. What I wanted to point out is that debating over which of these companies is the all time best game developper can't end up in a rational debate. It'll inevitably fall in a battle of tastes and opinion over things that can't be objectively analysed. Unless you focus on one specific point (like sales for example)

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Eazy1891
Eazy1891

3089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

wow...thats crazy i thought the list would turn out alot more different then that

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ironman388
ironman388

1454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

how is EA canada above valve? seriously they make some mediocre sports games and now they they are regarded as a good company? valve has made some of the best shooters ever created, how is this possible

Upvote • 
Avatar image for hatieshorrer
hatieshorrer

1275

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The Economy is designed on the basses that products that are the most liked will make the most money. If you think it wrong to bass the quality of a studio on the profits they make because your favorite studio came in too low a place it was simply that not enough people were interested in it to buy it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jemwilli
jemwilli

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

The study factored in sales figures and community reputation based on "the quality of direct interaction working for or with that developer where possible." (Gamasutra) I think this ranking represents a more investor and game designer view of studios ie. "Was this a profitable studio, and does it have a good work environment?" But if you look at the titles on the list I would say it shows that good games come from good companies.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for NemesisLives
NemesisLives

426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Umm...is it just me or I'm I the only one that thinks that rating Devs on how much money their game made is the wrong way to rate them. Shouldn't they get rated on you know...how well they develop games.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for tgrah1827
tgrah1827

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@ raahsnavj Activision is a publisher not a developer

Upvote • 
Avatar image for raahsnavj
raahsnavj

4895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

What, no activision? Do they make any games or are they the "EA with a good reputation"? Sure you have the companies they swallowed, but yet they don't produce anything of value?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Timbydude
Timbydude

1087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@azureblade89 Remember, only 2008-2009 games were eligible for this. Mass Effect was released in '07, so the only BioWare game eligible would be Sonic Chronicles, which definitely wasn't award-worthy.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for azureblade89
azureblade89

210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Granted, most of the devs on the board are quite amazing, I would've slotted HMX up a bit higher and Koei in a ditch, however you can't make a list like this and seriously not add Bioware to it. Honestly that's just not right.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for xXFr34k_0uTXx
xXFr34k_0uTXx

533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

@liam72 I'm pretty sure that the amount of sales a developer has will contribute success to the company history because of the games they create. You are right, it is about what you prefer, but I don't think it boils down to an individual preference. Its more of a worldwide preference, so to speak. Blizzard and Nintendo do well in this category. =]

Upvote • 
Avatar image for liam72
liam72

374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Debating over the best developper is stupid. It depends on what you believe is important. Is it the company history? Is it the games it develop? Is it the sales? The superiority of most of these companies could be defended, in the end it's all about who you prefer.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for liam72
liam72

374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Yeah, good to see Ubi mtl, Valve and HMX on there, I think they deserve it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Meluckycharms12
Meluckycharms12

227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

"MySins" made my EA Redwood Shores.. did I miss this release? =P

Upvote • 
Avatar image for nikola96
nikola96

836

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Kojima should be at least on 10#

Upvote • 
Avatar image for somomom
somomom

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Nintendo is #1 because of Shigeru Miyamoto. That guy makes games out of thin air.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Sharhan96
Sharhan96

182

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

not surprised that Kojima was able to make the list with only one game(MGS4) many people liked it and it took a perfect score. GO MGS4.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Phaselinear
Phaselinear

269

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

B.S. list. Obviously quality of the "overall" gaming experience doesn't count toward the list. Many on this list are average at best. If all you have to do is pump out average games, then fine. I would rather work for a company that 2-3 times a year is offering the best quality in gaming. 3/4's of the games listed here as examples of their companies merchandise is crap!!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sashacat222
sashacat222

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

i really want to know about another prince of persia

Upvote • 
Avatar image for taylormadederek
taylormadederek

1136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Nintendo is Weak Blizzard doesn't even release anything New And the rest of the list seems like it is in the wrong order. I love game developer magazine and I used to get it all the time but this list is weak.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jlord149
jlord149

34

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@marco245 'cause MGS4 was launched last year, and sells sre estimated in recent times. NINTENDO THE KING!!! F^(K ALL HATERS!!!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Rect_Pola
Rect_Pola

720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Not terribly suprising. EVERYONE who bought a Wii picked up the "basic kit".

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sar1995
sar1995

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

everybody hates Nintendo because they are undeniably THE BEST no doubt about it! I need all of you Nintendo lovers here!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for pilot_riaz
pilot_riaz

443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@BLuFAlc0n - Well said. Totally agree with you. Back in the 80s developers kept moving studios and taking their code with them. Nintendo was smart and they locked the good developers in by signaturing the code to Nintendo so they cannot take it with them when they moved. The developers stayed with Nintendo

Upvote • 
Avatar image for J0nGalt
J0nGalt

133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

Since Nintendo can't get a good virtual console game out any longer can we just take them off the list? Its the only reason I wanted a Wii! Seriously, every game i played on this system has been the suck. Don't waste your money, buy a computer or if you really really want a console then get the xbox 360.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for G00DANG
G00DANG

769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Thats about right except that nintendo and blizzard should be alot lower. Infinity ward should be in there somewhere too.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for BLuFAlc0n
BLuFAlc0n

550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

Why are HAL and Kojima is seperated from Nintendo and Konami? Nintendo, no doubt, is the BEST GAME DEVELOPERS in the World. Why? Coz Nintendo made the best selling game of all time (Super Mario Bros.), Flawless game. The Best Game of ALL TIME (Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time) Again, Absolutely Flawless The best selling franchise of gaming/ the face of gaming (Mario) Unlike Microsoft and Sony, Nintendo can make games! Kojima and Hal should be combined w/ Nintendo and Konami, Capcom should be higher as well, what's Rockstar doing @ 4th, and EA @ 5th? Capcom and Konami SHOULD be there!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Pexalottle
Pexalottle

297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Good seeing treyarch on that list. WAIT a second! Lol, Treyarch are better than infinity ward. They are very deserving of it anyway

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ChidoriBoyU
ChidoriBoyU

392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

ya kojima #19?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for holyghost87
holyghost87

171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Kojima at #19 :(

Upvote • 
Avatar image for azaiarnyi
azaiarnyi

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Rubbish. Where's Crytek and Bungie?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for gameking5000
gameking5000

1360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

Good to see Ubisoft there. Prince of Persia and Far Cry 2 are most deserving

Upvote • 
Avatar image for korko3
korko3

246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 45

User Lists: 0

Atleast there is one list where developers that make over hyped junk like MGS4 and Halo aren't in the front running.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for X-Remnant
X-Remnant

781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Ryusuke_Akihiro Since when is world of warcraft "casual"?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Ryusuke_Akihiro
Ryusuke_Akihiro

425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Figures all the casual gamers would run out and play Mario Kart wii and World of Warcraft like crazy... doesn't make Blizzard or Nintendo any better than the other devs.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for AlphaCommando
AlphaCommando

241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Insomniac is FTW!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for haste2099
haste2099

340

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

seriously nintendo ??? im not a fanboy of any consoles whatsoever but geez mario is so overplayed as well as all the other 300 donkey kong , mario party , metroid , castlevania games nintendo has .. for once i want to see nintendo do something else that DOESNT revolve around their mainstream

Upvote • 
Avatar image for RoyalRook09
RoyalRook09

175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Is there even a question about Nintendo's position in the video game world? Seriously, it's the Mario's world and we are just living in it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Pete5506
Pete5506

10112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 39

User Lists: 0

I'm glad to see Unisoft on there, some how they always have good games

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DivineMeliadoul
DivineMeliadoul

141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Well if its based on retail performance this is right on, but I think there should be more to a "top" developer than just the hard numbers. Maybe its just me...

Upvote • 
  • 91 results
  • 1
  • 2