GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Nintendo Sees Potential In Generative AI, But Won't Make Games Created "By Technology Alone"

For now, Nintendo is focusing on people, not technology, to create its games.

1 Comments

Several video game companies have begun exploring how generative AI can help with the development process of their titles, but Nintendo isn't ready to embrace the technology just yet. When asked in a shareholder Q&A if the company had any initiatives in place to use AI, Nintendo president Shuntaro Furukawa explained that AI could be used "in creative ways" but there were also "issues with intellectual property rights" to deal with.

"Generative AI, which is becoming a big topic recently, can be used in creative ways, but we recognize that it may also raise issues with intellectual property rights," Furukawa said. While Nintendo is open to "utilizing technological developments," it is currently relying on its experienced employees to develop unique games.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Now Playing: How the Nintendo Switch SAVED Nintendo

"We have decades of know-how in creating the best gaming experiences for our players. While we are open to utilizing technological developments, we will work to continue delivering value that is unique to Nintendo and cannot be created by technology alone," Furukawa said.

In comparison, companies like EA and Ubisoft have big plans for generative AI. In March, EA boss Andrew Wilson spoke about how AI could be used to develop games more quickly and it how it could potentially be used to make 10%-20% more revenue from microtransactions.

Meanwhile, Microsoft is heavily invested in AI and has said AI will be featured in every product it makes going forward, including Xbox, and Ubisoft plans to create AI NPCs that players can have conversations with.

A major concern about the usage of generative AI in the workplace is that it will lead to job losses. Last year, Wilson said that this was a legitimate concern, although he added that there might be "meaningful increases" in job opportunities in the future. In February, EA announced that it was laying off 5% of its staff, or around 670 employees. While not directly related to AI, Microsoft also cut 1,900 people from its video game division earlier this year.

Darryn Bonthuys on Google+

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 1 comments about this story
1 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for brightamethyst
brightamethyst

174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

This is what so many people don't seem to understand about AI. That it's not magic. It's not going to self generate AAA games without the need to programmers and artists and writers and the like. AI is just a development tool like any other.

It's easy to look at all the AI art theft out there now and see only the negatives, but there are plenty of things that would be helped by automation, rather than costing artists a job. "Make sure no two semi-randomly generated NPCs are exactly the same", "press every single controller button combination a million times to check for input conflicts", etc. The sort of things that's just too tedious and time consuming to be worth having a live person do.

Upvote •