Feature Article

Oculus' Santa Cruz Prototype Opens Up New Possibilities For Wireless VR Headsets

GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

The Santa Cruz 2 prototype provides six degrees of movement and fully-tracked controllers that work surprisingly well.

We recently had the chance to try out Oculus’ latest prototype of its wireless VR headset at the Connect 4 event. Codenamed Santa Cruz 2, the head-mounted display uses four front-facing sensors that allow it to provide six-degrees of movement, which allows you to effectively lean into and away from objects. This is a crucial VR feature that other wireless HMDs like Gear VR and Google Daydream lack.

While Oculus revealed Santa Cruz last year at Connect 3,the second generation prototype stands out for its ability to track Oculus' new motion controllers. The controllers themselves are similar to the Oculus Touch models released late last year and are designed by the same team. They use the same Constellation technology and similarly feature a bunch of small infrared LEDs to enable tracking.

Santa Cruz' tracked controllers looks similar to Oculus Touch.
Santa Cruz' tracked controllers looks similar to Oculus Touch.

Because Santa Cruz will not use separate, external sensors, it will rely on the four sensors on the front of the HMD to track its controllers. This means that if the controllers extend beyond the front of the headset, they can lose tracking. And just as a slight spoiler warning, we were able to break tracking a bit when we tried.

We had a chance to try out two gameplay demos with Santa Cruz. One was more of a simple tech demo, and the other felt more like a fleshed-out room-scale game that demanded we walk around our environment.

The demo one is called Boundless, and featured a small dragon-like creature named Bogo frolicking around a meadow. We were able to reach out and pet Bogo, and it convincingly reacted with delight. We were also able to walk around, pick up a stick, and play fetch. While the graphics weren’t as impressive as something you’d see on the Oculus Rift with a powerful PC, it was refreshing and freeing to walk around a fully 3D tracked environment with six degrees of movement without any wires to tether us down.

While the controllers tracked well when they were within our line of sight, we did temporarily lose tracking when we extended our arms beyond our peripheral vision. It took about a second or so for them to snap back in place once our hands were back in the safe zone.

The Santa Cruz controllers feature similar grip and trigger buttons to Touch.
The Santa Cruz controllers feature similar grip and trigger buttons to Touch.

We also tried a demo for a game called Time Stall. The premise is that there is a guy asleep in a cryo chamber, and it’s your job to protect him from bullets and rock shards that are slowly flying his way. You only have a short time to do this and once time’s up, you get to see the action play out in real-time and see whether you did enough to prevent his death. Imagine the Quicksilver scenes in the X-men movies, and you've got the right idea. While we weren’t able to save our subject, that had more to do with our performance than with Time Stall itself. The game makes great use of Santa Cruz’s untethered nature, as you really have to walk around your space to prevent incoming projectiles from multiple angles.

Because the headset is wireless, it uses a mobile processor. The HMD was a bit front-heavy, but Oculus isn’t focusing on its ergonomics yet, nor is it talking about its specific system-on-a-chip (SOC), optics or lenses, as the company says all these aspects of the HMD are still up in the air. The company is primarily focusing on proving that its inside-out wireless tracking technology is viable. As a result, Oculus hasn’t announced pricing or a release date for Santa Cruz, but the company says that developer kits will ship sometime in 2018.

We didn’t experience any latency, judder, or motion sickness with our 15 minutes with it. The controllers tracked well when they were within our line of sight, but it would be nice to see extra sensors perhaps on the sides and the back of the headset that would further prevent controller occlusion issues. As an early prototype, however, Santa Cruz shows a lot of promise and combines some of the best elements of mobile VR with PC VR.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com


jimmythang

Jimmy Thang

Hi! I'm Jimmy Thang and I'm GameSpot's Tech Editor!

Back To Top
6 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for g4m1ngon
G4m1ngOn

376

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

Wireless VR headset? With controllers? And position tracking? TAKEMAMONEY!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for streamline
streamline

2258

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I still want the option to get higher end PC graphics and p a fast way to get movies onto it, even if it is wired.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DAOWAce
DAOWAce

800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

I'd rather not have a wireless signal being broadcasted an inch from my brain..

Hope their new model will have an optional wired-only function we can use, as the health risks involved with EMF generated by wireless technology will most likely never change.. at least not in the near future.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for gamingdevil800
gamingdevil800

7159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

@DAOWAce: So have you stopped using microwaves, mobile phones, wireless headphones and run away from electrical power lines? EMF's are unavoidable in daily life. Current evidence does not confirm the existence of any health consequences from exposure to low level electromagnetic fields. However, some gaps in knowledge about biological effects exist and need further research.

4 • 
Avatar image for DAOWAce
DAOWAce

800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By DAOWAce

@gamingdevil800: There's a difference between using an EMF producing device, like a microwave, and having one right next to your brain, one of our most sensitive organs, for hours at a time. Heck, it's in front of our eyes too, and they're sensitive to EMF as well.

There's been plenty of studies done on EMF/RF over the decades, and plenty on smartphones, and it shows that modern era usage of a smartphone will affect your brain tissue, even after a half hour session.

TLDR: It's radiation, and radiation is well known to be harmful to living tissue, no matter the species.

As for my own personal habits, I take steps to minimize the RF I receive. I leave the room the microwave is in, I don't own a mobile phone (more a money/lack of need thing), don't use any wireless peripherals (including wireless routers). Whatever else I'm exposed to outside of my house is just daily unavoidable life, I don't go crazy over it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for gamingdevil800
gamingdevil800

7159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

@DAOWAce: From my understanding these wireless signals give off radiation which is the same as background radiation that is basically everywhere. If these devices are doing damage then my hands will be screwed in later life lol cause I've been using a controller since I was 4 on the PS2.

Upvote •