GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Star Wars Battlefront Prioritizes Frame Rate Over Resolution

"Don't want to sacrifice it for resolution."

179 Comments

DICE has spoken out to address the technical performance of Star Wars Battlefront in the wake of criticism about the game's frame rate and resolution. Technical director Johan Andersson says on that the sci-fi shooter prioritizes frame rate over resolution to achieve the best possible overall experience.

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to GameSpot's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Responding to criticisms about how Battlefront's beta runs at 900p on PlayStation 4 and 720p on Xbox One instead of full 1080p, Andersson said, "Frame rate and fidelity is indeed king; don't want to sacrifice it for resolution. But a choice each game team does."

A previous technical analysis of Battlefront's beta revealed that both PS4 and Xbox One are targeting 60fps. However, this frame rate can dip during some particularly intensive encounters.

DICE is not the first studio to speak out about the importance of frame rate. Final Fantasy XV director Hajime Tabata previous said "frame rate is more important than resolution" for the Square Enix RPG.

The Battlefront beta started on October 8 and runs through October 13. It is being held across Xbox One, PlayStation 4, and PC, and is free and open to everyone; use these download links to start playing right now.

Are you already playing the beta? How are you finding it? Let us know in the comments below.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 179 comments about this story
179 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for H0RSE
H0RSE

2133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

Edited By H0RSE

"Responding to criticisms about how Battlefront's beta runs at 900p on PlayStation 4 and 720p on Xbox One instead of full 1080p,"

- attention console crowd: if you want games like this running at 1080/60fps, compromises need to made. You need to have things like less objects on screen, lower poly models, lower res textures, etc. You can't have a game of this scope, running at 1080p/60fps with all the bells and whistles on console. We are talking about machines that are comparatively entry to mid lvl PC's - you can't have your cake and eat it too.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for tallestjon95
TallestJon95

100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

frame rate>resolution>graphics

They went a bit high with the graphics in my opinion. Lower lighting, shadows, and draw distance might have made it a 1080p60 vs 900p60 situation, which would have be n better.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Bryjoered07
Bryjoered07

206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

If you're even thinking about playing this game on anything other than a high end PC, you must be crazy. It's whatever, we will never get people to switch over to the platform that clearly has the best of all worlds. With the steam controller and steam link coming out next month, you literally could have a PC running upstairs, stream it to your giant big screen in the basement with zero latency and play games on the couch in perfect harmony in graphics that blow the doors of any console. If you guys would only learn...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Drainyou_98
Drainyou_98

55

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

YES! Thats the once thing i wish cd project red would do with witcher 3- just give us the option! Framerate over resolution anyday! Resolution overrated!!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for BradBurns
BradBurns

1169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This game looks great on consoles. Specially considering that they're both at the $350 mark now.

PC fans need to remember that not everyone gives a **** about building a PC.

2 • 
Avatar image for Bryjoered07
Bryjoered07

206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Bryjoered07

@BradBurns: You don't even need to, look into the steambox. The steam controller allows you to control mouse driven games with a thumb pad as well. The steambox is a PC that is the size of your typical console and is meant to go into your living room.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for tsunami2311
tsunami2311

1844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Consoles are under power that is the problem, those mobile parts they use are why

Upvote • 
Avatar image for rooster1223
rooster1223

142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By rooster1223

Star Wars Battlefront runs at 900p on the PS4

Assassin's Creed Syndicate runs at 900p on the PS4

The PS4 is now King of the 900p resolution war

Lmao

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jayz0ned
jayz0ned

383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@rooster1223: And Xbox One is King of the the 720p resolution ;)

2 • 
Avatar image for Gravity_Slave
Gravity_Slave

1751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Apparently it also took priority over customization, depth and everything else that makes a Battlefield game fun. They reduced this game to a simple and static shooter.

The running back and forth from pod to pod is just stupid. The hero system is broken (why is a Jedi Luke running around on Hoth??). The maps are small and baron. You can't customize weapons or classes. Just a couple of burn cards and the one go-to OP go-to gun.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for arainthus
Arainthus

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@Gravity_Slave: It's called "Battlefront" not "Battlefield" for a reason, they're entirely different games.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ruthaford_jive
ruthaford_jive

519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Gravity_Slave: I don't think it was trying to be a battlefield clone. I get the impression it was going for something simpler, which isn't inherently bad.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Drainyou_98
Drainyou_98

55

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ruthaford_jive: Agreed- original battlefront was so good- just keep it nice and simple- guns,vehicles and mayhem!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for drumjod
drumjod

855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Glad to hear that. I hope we'll see more developers prioritize gameplay and frame rate over slide show image quality.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-60c3d23d2738e
deactivated-60c3d23d2738e

3934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Wont deny it, this gen really fell flat on it's face. Last gen upgrade was the biggest and probably the best in console history. I joined the master race and am happy I did. Screw both companys an their cash grab, underpowered consoles that can't even offer what the consoles last gen can. Sony, i'm staring at you! Had to sell one console an it was PS4, at least xbox one has better exclusives imo and is an all aound entertainment console. All PS4 has are well, games that have bad framerate..

Upvote • 
Avatar image for santiagodraco
santiagodraco

40

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Running at 5760x1080p with no issues. Oh wait I'm not running on a console. Shawwwing!

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Isamu_36
Isamu_36

207

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

I agree.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for santiagodraco
santiagodraco

40

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@tyranttortuga: Hmm, that completely depends on the game. For FPS of course. For RPG/etc then Resolution is king (without shitty frame rates of course.

3 • 
Avatar image for killuax3
KilluaX3

21

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@santiagodraco: If it's a fast paced RPG then frame rate must be 60.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for 93ChevyNut
93ChevyNut

1396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I know that the PC is the way to go to get the best graphics, but I don't like the fact that everyone will be KB/M'ing, and I'd rather sit on a couch than at a desk any day. I've tried KB/M on a couch, it isn't very comfortable.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for santiagodraco
santiagodraco

40

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@93ChevyNut: Get a better chair ;)

Upvote • 
Avatar image for 93ChevyNut
93ChevyNut

1396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@santiagodraco: I'd love to get a chair more conducive to PC gaming, it's my wife that's not so much into it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for nurnberg
nurnberg

1313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

It's funny, because COD games have both good graphics and a high frame rate... yet other developers cry that they can't do it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for purgatori
Purgatori

220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Purgatori

@nurnberg: Battlefront's beta had much better graphics than BO3's beta. I know that can still change but I personally didn't think that BO3 looked all that good graphically.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for UltimateBastard
UltimateBastard

1300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By UltimateBastard

@nurnberg: cods graphics are mediocre at best, it takes a fairly average rig to run it maxed out @ 60fps. Still, graphics really aren't everything

2 • 
Avatar image for slupian
slupian

57

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@nurnberg: i was actually thinking the same thing but than realized Cod has smaller maps and lower player counts. I think what it really comes down to is that they rush to get these games out by certain deadlines so they do the best they can in that timeframe. Because its really hard for me to believe the devs that say they are already pushing these systems to their limit.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jcogopogo
jcogopogo

168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 5

Hmm I think it looks great on a ps4. I don't have a high PC so I have nothing to compare it to. Really like how the game plays. the vehicles are different then I thought they would be, I like how you find the coins to get in them much better then having someone horde them all match

Upvote • 
Avatar image for BassMan
BassMan

18817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 234

User Lists: 0

Framerate is more important, but on PC you can have both. 1440p/144fps FTW!

2 • 
Avatar image for bubba_666
Bubba_666

835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

Also when they built the system it's like to guys making gaming rigs. One goes for the cheaper GPU not as capable, yet passable. And the other guy goes for the more expensive higher end GPU, which will give him higher resolutions and better framerates overall. So one guy will always be behind, until he upgrades. Which may not happen for years, or ever. That's the case of MS and Sony. One company shopped well, the other was cheap and didn't give much of a s%$t. lol Pretty simple:

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Drkoolbeanz
Drkoolbeanz

222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Drkoolbeanz

It's pretty apparent that both M$ and Sony were in this to maximize profits over engineering or hardware quality. Neither console runs the game at the resolution of your TV, that's pretty bad for consoles that just came out a year or two ago. Gamespot had showed us that it takes practically no GPU power at all to out perform modern consoles: http://www.gamespot.com/articles/149-nvidia-gtx-750-ti-unveiled-plays-titanfall-better-than-xbox-one/1100-6417813/

It's important to remember that neither Sony or Microsoft are game companies, they're just tw big kids that bought their way into the game industry and killed off the competition with their big wallets. This is all about lowest common denominator hardware and profits to them.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5d495083aed2b
deactivated-5d495083aed2b

724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Drkoolbeanz: Sad but true

Upvote • 
Avatar image for firebrandtb
firebrandtb

6

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I've been playing 4k at max settings and I have to say, compared to ps4, it looks absolutely amazing. This isn't a rushed game, and this isn't their fault. I'm the furthest thing from a DICE/EA fan, battlefield is the perfect example of anti-fun to me and EA is all too well known for releasing unfinished games to sell more DLC. The framerate is smooth enough at 4k, and extremely high at 1080p, and on a single 970. That is current generation hardware and not even the most powerful. The consoles today are subpar, far from powerful enough to handle new games coming out. This generation of consoles just doesn't have the longevity that we expect as consumers, mediocrity is becoming the standard, and for once, it's not from the game design team.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for bigruss730
bigruss730

241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 5

Can anyone recommend any threads/forums on steam-boxes? I could do with a bit of info/advice before I make a choice....

Upvote • 
Avatar image for tallestjon95
TallestJon95

100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@bigruss730: wait til November when they come out, then there should be some good coverage.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for bubba_666
Bubba_666

835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

I wouldn't mind 30fps at 1080p, especially with such a beautiful game. I'm sure they could hit 40 in most places, which is great. 60fps was much more apparent in the PS4 version, which I played first. Still lots of pop-in-out textures even at 900p. But played well. On Xbox One, meh, not so much, even at 720p, it looked "good" not great, but I'd say it dipped down in the mid 30's a lot. Xbox One just is not meant for both high resolution and good FR. I remember the article where it said you can have either (with Xbox One), "Next gen gameplay or next gen graphics, you can't have both". Which has turned out to be the case. I still like mine a lot though. PS4 is just pretty boring at the moment. Even though I'm playing uncharted collection. SW Battlefront seems ok, but not as stellar as I had hoped. maybe that will change.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for MuffintopX
MuffintopX

1064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By MuffintopX

For an FPS (or 3PS, whatever) they are absolutely right. Gotta have that frame rate.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DeadrisingX1
DeadrisingX1

1850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 138

User Lists: 0

It still looks amazing, even if it isn't 1080p.
And heck, who doesn't like a steady frame rate?

2 • 
Avatar image for spazicle
Spazicle

110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

I have a feeling this game will be a bigger disappointment than Destiny.

4 • 
Avatar image for Millard11
Millard11

62

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@spazicle: you must be fun at parties.

2 • 
Avatar image for Shantmaster_K
Shantmaster_K

1790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

Should be the case for all developers.

2 •