GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

Ubisoft Continues Trying To Ward Off A Vivendi Takeover By Expanding Its Board Of Directors

Ubisoft's annual shareholders meeting, which should be an extremely important day for the company, is less than three months away.

29 Comments

Much as it did last year, Ubisoft is again seeking to expand its board of directors with independent members. The company announced today one of the measures it hopes to pass at its annual shareholders meeting in September.

Ubisoft has proposed that both Corinne Fernandez-Handelsman and Virginie Haas join the board as independent directors (meaning board members who have no material relationship with the company itself). With an existing one, Pascale Mounier, on her way out in September, this would raise the total number of board members to 11, with six of those being independent. This would thus allow Ubisoft to meet its newly stated goal of having an independent majority on the board.

CEO Yves Guillemot and CFO Alain Martinez at last year's shareholders meeting. Image credit: Ubisoft
CEO Yves Guillemot and CFO Alain Martinez at last year's shareholders meeting. Image credit: Ubisoft

"We are delighted to continue the expansion of our board of directors with the nominations of Corinne and Virginie as independent directors," said chairman and CEO Yves Guillemot. "If their appointments are approved by our shareholders at the next general meeting, our board will have an independent majority, and nearly half of the directors will be women. This development reflects our desire to comply with the best corporate governance practices for the benefit of all our shareholders, while also combining the necessary expertise and competencies for Ubisoft’s long-term success. At a time when the group's model is transforming, Corinne and Virginie will add valuable and leading-edge expertise to the board."

In a statement shared with GameSpot, a Ubisoft spokesperson added, "This is first and foremost about Ubisoft adopting the latest best practices in corporate governance and continuing to act in the best interests of the company and all our shareholders for the long term."

Although it's had at least one for more than a decade, Ubisoft last year hoped to reach the 50% mark with independent members on the board. It successfully managed to do so following a vote among shareholders in September. This is part of a strategy meant to deal with Vivendi, the French media conglomerate that has slowly been acquiring more shares in Ubisoft. It stands as the single largest shareholder in the games publisher, though it is not yet represented on the board of directors--a point it raised following last year's shareholders meeting.

Vivendi has steadily increased its control of shares in Ubisoft since 2015; its ownership is now up to over 27% of its shares (and 24.5% of voting rights). At 30%, French law would mandate that it pursue a controlling stake in the company. Ubisoft and the Guillemot family (which founded the company and have five seats on the board) have repeatedly spoken out against Vivendi's moves, saying it would hamper the publisher's ability to innovate and be agile, among other things. Vivendi said in early 2016 that it had "no plans" for a Ubisoft takeover, but its actions have suggested otherwise. In April, Reuters reported that Vivendi would pursue a takeover attempt this year. Last year, Vivendi took over French developer Gameloft, which was also founded and led by the Guillemots.

This year's annual shareholders meeting is set to take place on September 22. It's likely to be an extremely important day for the company, as Vivendi could seek representation on the board or otherwise impact the proceedings. Last year, it abstained from voting on resolutions during the meeting, which in turn prevented several of them from passing. This was subsequently referenced in Ubisoft's press release recapping the outcome; it stated that "some resolutions were rejected due to Vivendi's systematic obstruction, impeding the proper functioning of the company, in particular regarding its competitive compensation policy for its talents."

This story has been updated with an additional quote from Ubisoft.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 29 comments about this story
29 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for speed45823
speed45823

874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

Couldn't have happened to a worse video game company. Ubisoft as is, is one of the worst companies ever. Yes, they're somewhat worse than EA if you can believe it with all the always online crap with server fails, overpriced editions of the same games, nickel and dime DLCs, franchises milked so dry that they're now beating the cow to get anything out of it and the very name of those franchises gives people shivers down their spines, uninspired copy paste game mechanics ported from one game to another to the point where you feel like you're playing that other Ubisoft game from last year, announcing season passes months and months before game release, cutting contents from base game and selling them as season passes and the list goes on and on. No wonder they're one of the most hated companies by consumers and gamers alike. Ubisoft used to be great a long long time ago. But now they're a crap company. Even their logo represents how crap they are.

http://imgur.com/gallery/LYbDs

4 • 
Avatar image for Pyrosa
Pyrosa

10650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

Hand all the Vivendi people giant maps full of shallow repetitive activities to complete...

8 • 
Avatar image for bryanweary
BryanWeary

1309

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@Pyrosa: And some of the activities can only be completed through the use of a smartphone app....

2 • 
Avatar image for Dav_id83
Dav_id83

560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

It's only a matter of time before some of the shareholders on the board get the right offer from Vivendi and they sell there stake thus Viv get to take over, if shares rises with more bids from Viv they will sell it's business

2 • 
Avatar image for Runeweaver
Runeweaver

598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

Edited By Runeweaver

I haven't been a fan of Ubisoft for quite awhile, but after E3 there did seem to be some hope for them, So I hope Vivendi fails to take them over, Trouble is money talks and their shareholders only care about money, and their share price will rise if Vivendi succeed.

7 • 
Avatar image for yukushi
yukushi

2368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Wouldnt it be easier to send ezio to take out some of those guys or go into the animus and take out their grandfathers so they are never born, so many ways to solve this problem.

7 • 
Avatar image for Pawfalcon
Pawfalcon

1087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Hope all goes well with Ubi, like some of the games they've been releasing lately and whats in the works, and large corps putting their hands on the wheel in creative fields just tends not to end well. Bad enough that they're a public company (as far as hands tying goes).

4 • 
Avatar image for sargentpsgamer
sargentpsgamer

1191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

1 Why did they have to mention "and over half of them are female." What does that have to do with anything? It should just be qualified individuals, but based on how lackluster their games are that seems questionable....

2 They say it will hamper their ability to create new games, yet they keep pushing out cookie cutter games and sequels to once successful franchises instead of pushing anything new. The only good thing that came out of them recently is Rainbow Six, and that game totally flew under the radar for them and was a surprise. The scare of Vivendi is they will milk franchises, yet how many Assassin's Creed games do we have now?

Go make another conference where you think saying the F word is cool and move along. I thought Vivendi was bad, but now I think it might actually help them get in the right direction before too much damage is done and we lose another publisher.

5 • 
Avatar image for darthrevenx
DarthRevenX

4519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

it's a matter of time until Ubi is taken over......

they've devalued themselves by making cookie cutter games, the same game over and over again and no variety in the games they make.....well if you want variety you have to play Rayman or Lonely Hearts or whatever....these indie games and for some gamers we don't care for most indie games.....

personally I like what HouseMarque does, Resogun, Dead Nation & Nex Machina to name a few.....they aren't just making retro style games, they're reusing old and cool game types in new ways and frankly that's how you should do it....not Meat Boy this eww old games were spikes and saw blades everywhere mentality......

Assassins is just like Far Cry and that's just like Watch Dogs and that is just like The Division which is just like GR Wildlands.....play one and you've played all of em....

I'm a lost cause as a customer, for me they've burned me too much in the past and I'll never bother with their games again.....well unless something changes and they start making better games again.......right, laughable.....that sh**t won't happen, Ubi is beyond redemption at this point......

3 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5a803cda1fb41
deactivated-5a803cda1fb41

290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Just let it happen Ubisoft, you both deserve each other.

6 • 
Avatar image for ECH71
ECH71

933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

@bernard978: It's better if they fight it. I like watching Vivendi sink its teeth into Ubisoft as it struggles to breathe.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for locke90
locke90

874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@lonesamurai1: EA is now too big to fail way too big plus they do have licensed sports franchises to milk as well.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jamesbr27
JamesBR27

410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

If Ubisoft stopped putting mandatory online trophies for me to get I would gladly support them buying their games. For real, I wanted both Watch Dogs but skipped both because of that. I only finished the two first Assassin's Creed games because of that, I skipped all Far Cry games. Its fine to have online modes but I dont want to grind trophies online.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Rufus_the_rat
Rufus_the_rat

853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@jamesbr27: Forget just the trophies, you can't even PLAY most of the single players content in their game offline anymore. They've turned into some sort of bad Korean MMO company.

2 • 
Avatar image for 3partan341
3partan341

320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By 3partan341

Ubi took all my favorite game series and shat on them. It would be funny to see them eaten up by an even greedier group lol. I haven't enjoyed a Rainbow Six game since Rainbow Six 3 and every time I play Arma I think about how badass Ghost Recon used to be.

Icons - Red Storm

https://youtu.be/iuS121FVdQE

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sargentpsgamer
sargentpsgamer

1191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@3partan341: Ghost Recon on the PS2 was awesome, even some of the PS3 games were really great! I was excited for Wild Lands, then Ubisoft threw their boring as hell "open world" template on it and ruined it.....

Though Rainbow Six Siege is fantastic. If they tied that to a single player for Ghost Recon, you'd have one hell of a game.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Acillatem1993
Acillatem1993

1103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Go Ubi!

2 • 
Avatar image for Syphon_Filter2
Syphon_Filter2

215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Syphon_Filter2

Can someone please explain to me one thing. If Ubisoft doesn't want Vivendi to buy their share, why Ubisoft are selling them? Don't sell them and Vivendi won't take over the share thing. I just don't get it.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for RELeon
RELeon

722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By RELeon

@Syphon_Filter2: Can't always control who buys up your stock once you go public. If someone wants to sell their shares, and they sell them to Vivendi, you can't really stop that. Those shares are theirs to sell to whomever they want. Anyone with stock in Ubi probably knows to go to Vivendi if they wanna sell quick, so Vivendi probably just has to sit there and let people come to them.

4 • 
Avatar image for gamingdevil800
gamingdevil800

7159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

Edited By gamingdevil800

@Syphon_Filter2: Companies who want to raise a lot of money for future expansion or profits etc choose to go public. Its totally the choice of the company whether they sell shares of their company or not. Unless they keep a controlling share then they run the risk of being taken over by another individual or company. Ubisoft obviously wasn't smart when it came to controlling their share of the company when they went public and vivendi is buying shares that aren't controlled by ubisoft . A lot of companies choose to stay private to avoid this risk.

4 • 
Avatar image for Rufus_the_rat
Rufus_the_rat

853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Rufus_the_rat

@gamingdevil800: History has proven the French are not particularly smart when it comes to preventing foreign invasions.

5 • 
Avatar image for Molokai16
Molokai16

276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Rufus_the_rat: You mean aside from the time that Napoleon pretty much conquered all of Europe?

Upvote •