GameSpot may receive revenue from affiliate and advertising partnerships for sharing this content and from purchases through links.

US Senators "Deeply Concerned" About Microsoft's Proposed Deal To Buy Activision Blizzard

Democratic Senators Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, and Sheldon Whitehouse wrote a letter to the FTC to outline their concerns.

48 Comments

A group of US Senators, including Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, are calling for greater scrutiny over Microsoft's proposed buyout of Activision Blizzard, citing concerns about the reports of misconduct at the Call of Duty giant. The Wall Street Journal first reported on this. After the publication of this story, Activision Blizzard released a statement (see it below) in which it said Microsoft is supportive of Activision Blizzard's "goals and the work being done" to improve company culture.

The US Senators--including Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Cory Booker, and Sheldon Whitehouse--wrote their letter to Federal Trade Commission chair Lina Khan. The lawmakers said the FTC ought to find out if Microsoft's proposed buyout of Activision Blizzard could "exacerbate the flurry of sexual-abuse, harassment and retaliation allegations at Activision stemming from recent federal and state investigations."

Just this week, a judge approved Activision Blizzard's settlement over workplace culture issues that will see the company create an $18 million fund to compensate and make amends to affected workers. This was just one of the lawsuits Activision Blizzard is facing regarding its workplace issues.

The senators also said they are concerned that Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick, who himself has been accused of knowing about and covering up instances of sexual harassment and other abuse, will remain with the company and potentially earn a massive payout under the terms of the deal. It's been reported that Kotick will leave after the deal goes through.

It's a rule that mergers of a significant size must be approved by the US government over antitrust matters, so a review was always going to happen. But the senators are submitting their feedback separate from that and to cite their own specific concerns. The WSJ previously reported that Khan, the FTC chair, would specifically look into whether or not Microsoft's proposed buyout of Activision Blizzard would "substantially lessen competition."

"We are deeply concerned about consolidation in the tech industry and its impact on workers," the Democratic Senators said in their letter, as reported by The Wall Street Journal.

Microsoft's CEO, Satya Nadella, believes that the deal will go through, which is not a surprise. He said in an interview that, if the deal should materialize, Microsoft will still be number three in terms of market share.

A spokesperson for Activision Blizzard sent along a statement in response to the US Senators lobbying the FTC to scrutinize the Microsoft/Activision Blizzard deal. You can read the full statement below.

"On Tuesday, the federal court approved a settlement agreement between Activision Blizzard and the EEOC that includes an $18M fund to compensate eligible claimants and to bolster enhancements to policies, practices, and training to prevent harassment and discrimination in the workplace, among other commitments. The company is committed to a safe and equitable working environment for all employees and has invested significant resources to ensure we’re creating a model for the industry. The transaction between Microsoft and Activision Blizzard will not interrupt any of the actions the Activision Blizzard’s leadership team has implemented throughout 2021 and is continuing to implement in 2022 with regards to improving our workplace. Activision Blizzard’s leadership team has discussed the company’s goals at length with Microsoft, and Microsoft has reviewed the renewed culture commitment and actions Activision Blizzard have done so far, and the efforts they've undertaken. Microsoft is supportive of the goals and the work being done. This is a compelling transaction for all stakeholders, including employees.

"No additional special compensation arrangements for Mr. Kotick were entered into in connection with the transaction. Mr. Kotick's base salary has been reduced to California's minimum annual salary (which is approximately $62,500 for 2022), and he will not be awarded any bonuses or equity grants until the Workplace Responsibility Committee of the Activision Blizzard Board of Directors has determined that Activision Blizzard has made appropriate progress toward achievement of the transformational gender-related goals and other commitments described in such announcement."

Microsoft is looking to pay $68.7 billion to acquire Activision Blizzard as part of the technology giant's biggest acquisition of all time. It would be just the latest big buyout from Microsoft, which purchased ZeniMax in 2021 for $7.5 billion.

Got a news tip or want to contact us directly? Email news@gamespot.com

Join the conversation
There are 48 comments about this story
48 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for msmsnetnet
msmsnetnet

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

When I saw the headline I was like: "Wait... US Senators legit worried about gaming becoming a monopoly?... something isn't right." Figures this was just to score woke points.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jpop187
Jpop187

97

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Don't trust none of these people. Just shut up bernie/cory/warren

2 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-625793e9d045a
deactivated-625793e9d045a

383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

You are not too concerned when you let the ex-CEO's of these companies greasing your palms when election times come around.

Or, when they get the Director positions at the FCC, FTC, SEC and so on.

Its only when they are not giving you money your way. Why did you guys allow Activision and Blizzard to merge in the first place?

3 • 
Avatar image for Crazy_sahara
Crazy_sahara

1720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Seems noone will be voting for them again, plus why the hell are they still in office their terms should be up.

2 • 
Avatar image for bubbahax
BubbaHax

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@Crazy_sahara: Because they fool enough people with their grandstanding bullshit to keep voting for them. Not to mention 'irregularities' in voting. I honestly wonder if our elections have ever been honest.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for Zynn
Zynn

110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Zynn

In other words, China told them to be concerned, so now, they are concerned.

3 • 
Avatar image for tbird7586
tbird7586

835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Translation they want their payout to drop resistance they're all crooked as can be democrat and republican and they'll get huge sums of money "donated" to them

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

8017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This is basically branding, there is no chance, no time line,.... that anything of any judicial or committee investigation, or Justice Dept investigation --- could do , would do , anything about this. It is playing to the pulpit, considering the joke of an 18 million dollar lawsuit win for AB board and Kotick. Basically couch change and total legal, and civil liability swept under the rug. It is too late now, responding to the vocal uproar of the judgement, will not help shit.

It will be good to shine the light on the AB buyout leading up to these last few years, indeed. But not if you cannot do anything about it. Oh well, maybe they are just rolling out the red carpet welcome for Kotick's second life career- politics. Cannot wait for his book.

Oh interesting note about Bobby Kotick, 2014 ish when he was 50, he insisted all press is to use the 'Bobby' instead of Bob or his real name Robert or they could face legal action if they did so, in order to continue an appearance of being young and hip in the gaming industry. Interestingly, Robert Kelly would also like young girls to call him Bobby.

3 • 
Avatar image for chaosemerald
chaosemerald

225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Bernies got like 1 year left on this planet. Someone get this man a ranch to enjoy the rest of his time at.

Have these people wrote letters to any local law enforcement, companies, etc on behalf of the hundreds of thousands of other sexual abuse victims over the years? But oh now that we got a high profile event with lots of money involved now they are "concerned".

Dont worry, Bobby will send your "stfu and dont speak" check straight to your bank very shortly now.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for bubbahax
BubbaHax

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@chaosemerald: Bernie Sanders has three homes, paid for by all the leftover campaign donation money from his presidential runs. He's doing fine. No refunds, by the way.

2 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-64f32fa0d8a48
deactivated-64f32fa0d8a48

608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

So we're concerned about sexual harassment in the workplace, fair, we should be. But I'd think the solution would be a change in leadership, not maintaining the status quo, no? Also where was this concern before the buyout?

2 • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

8017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@rizenstrom:

Also where was this concern before the buyout?..... That is the point, swept under the rug. For AB the buyout is the solution to Koticks, the board, the CEOs, problems..... not the solution for the real problems there. A solution for .... them.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for sladakrobot
sladakrobot

11910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Heh,MS is touted to be one of friendliest places to work at and the senators are concerned that the situation at Activion/Blizzard will not be adressed and improved after the takeover?
Thats rich!


2 • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

8017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@sladakrobot: No, not that MS would change the culture to worse... if that could even be possible.. lol. Just why the buyout has lead up to this, by removing all culpability, charges, liability (judicial and civil), and allows some golden payouts (parachutes and insider trading) during and over the last couple of years.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for lonewolf1044
lonewolf1044

4983

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

@jenovaschilld: Actually, it ends nothing even if MS buys they out for the companies involved are not dissolved and even if they were dissolve they would still be liable. MS could have held off until all was settled and then make their move. But MS is willing to take the risk as they can cover any fines or penalties that the companies involved have. The seal is still going to go through and hopefully they will hash it out.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

8017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@lonewolf1044: A few of the lawsuits mention that the IPs are worth more then what MS paid, as well as the insider trading that happened before the MS buyout. I know sounds counter intuitive..... but the thing is MS got a really good deal and as we have seen, with the judgement mentioned in the article... that pretty much settles all of this. The probability of future fines, suddenly have shaky if non existent grounds to stand on, since the judge's decision settles all complaints.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@jenovaschilld: nonsense. MS paid $70 billion for A/B. That's more than worth their company. Tomorrow the CoD franchise could go under as people switch over to the next big thing.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

8017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@blaznwiipspman1: You mean the CoD Franchise that has been popular for 20yrs, 19 IPs, patent technology, assets, and franchising from lunch boxes to clothing, that ... that !, Franchise that could go under?? Yeah and people are sick of Italian plumbers also.

Just saying the last reported sales,

-------------The report says overall Call of Duty net bookings (sales of full games with live services and total microtransaction revenues) was down from 2020's record $3 billion revenues------

Yep, sinking ship.

IDK if AB is worth $70 billion, but there is some lawsuits asking why MS was given such a good deal. Maybe they are wrong.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By blaznwiipspman1

@jenovaschilld: they aren't worth anywhere near 70 billion cash, you have to be delusional to believe that nonsense. And in normal cases MS would never have paid that much for AB. It's just a completely stupid business decision, and the MS shareholders would have revolted if we just look at numbers. 3 billion in revenue is a laugh...hoe much actual net profit is that?? $100 million? AB will never pay off the 70 billion MS spent.

The only reason MS did it is because of its strategy and long term goal to dominate the subscription space. Again, MS bought it ONLY because of its subscription ambitions, and for MS to gain a foothold in the metaverse. Of course this is common sense and you should know that. Those frivolous lawsuits are just junk.

Oh yeah, vanguard did very poorly this year, no where near ABs target goals.

I'm sorry, but if any company like MS offers 70 billion for a shithole company like AB that only pulls in like 200 or 300 million net profit in a good year, they take that and RUN. AB just landed in a very good spot, they got lucky, just like those crypto fools got lucky when bitcoin and the others skyrocketed.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for santinegrete
santinegrete

7085

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

@blaznwiipspman1: I see that happening after Vanguard reception. I mean, the problems of bad game engineering have been pervasive from quite some time now, but OK...

Upvote • 
Avatar image for santinegrete
santinegrete

7085

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

Edited By santinegrete

Is any political party concerned with what went inside Activision before the take-over? I mean, some things there went from unethical to plain wrong.

3 • 
Avatar image for lonewolf1044
lonewolf1044

4983

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

@santinegrete: Yes, why care now when the problem existed before the impending takeover.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

8017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@santinegrete: Depends on the who is lobbying at the time.....

Upvote • 
Avatar image for mogan
mogan

19880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Edited By mogan  Moderator

I mean, isn't Xbox + Activision still going to be smaller than PlayStation or Nintendo?

Looking at big tech companies' workplace environments with regards to harassment and abuse is probably a good idea regardless of any pending acquisitions. My assumption is that Microsoft taking over is more likely to make things better for Activision employees than worse.

2 • 
Avatar image for lonewolf1044
lonewolf1044

4983

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

@mogan: May look that way but even if it may still be bigger it is the money they will generate as there are an lot of devs MS is picking up. Activision will still have to pay the money and MS may pay it for them just to put that behind them and move forward. MS is still in a win-win state regardless of the size as Sony will have to pay any royalties for any games made by those companies And MS pulls in an awful lot of money per year so they only have to sell and maintain. MS should take care of it's employees as Sony should as well.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

8017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By jenovaschilld

@mogan: It is not the size, it is over the resulting liabilities leading up, and the results as they escape out the back. Bellular news - here is a good article explaining why the 18 million settlement was a huge win for those at the heart of the biggest problems with Activision and how the stock holders may ultimately lose out because of the way AB is gonna be split up and changed around.

It is not the end result and leading forward, there is history with this size and bigger, far bigger. But what will happen to the workers, both before the merger and after. Including the legal problems the leadership will now be immune to.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-64efdf49333c4
deactivated-64efdf49333c4

21783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

Well, would you look at that. The FTC continues to worry about MS' record regarding anti-competitive practices. Just like I said they would. Right again, ho hum.

MS has recently stated they will continue to release major Activision titles on other platforms even after current agreements expire. I do wonder where they were when EA gained sole control of numerous sporting franchises.

2 • 
Avatar image for lonewolf1044
lonewolf1044

4983

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

@Barighm: It would only be anti-competitive if MS brought the companies out and made all games exclusive and that is not MS intention as MS stated they will share their products as MS has other plans that some are not seeing. The deal is still going to forward as planned and MS still wins as Sony will be paying MS for whatever games they are contracted to buy.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for jenovaschilld
jenovaschilld

8017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By jenovaschilld

@Barighm: Is that not different in that EA bought, sorry leased, a sport license from a company, NFL, who is allowed to license out their name and likenesses, VS two corporations merging?. Or one corporation owning the IPs and publishing is current and total IPs --- you know like two music or book publishers being bought out.? One selling a license rights and image for 10 yrs for a certain product (similar to GI Joe lunch boxes), while the other one is a merger of corporations that can then keep or go on and sale the IPs later on to others, because they own them.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-64efdf49333c4
deactivated-64efdf49333c4

21783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

@jenovaschilld: The difference is its anti-competitive. A company owning an IP it created is different from a company owning SOLE LICENSE of someone ELSE'S IP especially when an existing market of competition existed.

And there are laws in place to facilitate those who wish to use IPs that have been abandoned, so clearly the regulatory bodies recognize the freedom of others to use unused IP. The problem, as you point out in another post above, is those rules keep changing due to the desires of a select few.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for ceelogreen94
ceelogreen94

582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Please stay out of gaming there is a whole war going on yet you are concerned about this. How about you do something to fix this ridiculous gas prices and food cost rather than gaming.

2 • 
Avatar image for DETfaninATL
DETfaninATL

602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

Edited By DETfaninATL

@ceelogreen94: The Democrats are precisely the ones you have to thank for said prices being inflated. Don't look to them for solutions - only to make things worse........... which is par for the course with most politicians anyways........

4 • 
Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@DETfaninATL: dumb republican take

Upvote • 
Avatar image for lonewolf1044
lonewolf1044

4983

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Edited By lonewolf1044

@DETfaninATL: Yes, Republicans are supposed to be angels in your eyes since you want to play politics in a gaming forum. All those Trumps Republicans do not care about no one but Donald Trump.

2 • 
Avatar image for ceelogreen94
ceelogreen94

582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@DETfaninATL: I don't care who you like as a political affiliation and never will so please keep your crap to yourself. this is about gaming not who you like or don't like.

3 • 
Avatar image for gamerboy100
gamerboy100

1068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ceelogreen94: What if I told you that people can multitask?

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-64efdf49333c4
deactivated-64efdf49333c4

21783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

@gamerboy100: Especially since a lot of these guys aren't exactly connected to the military and international business side of things.

4 • 
Avatar image for makchady
makchady

1303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

Ironic since they all support a single payer healthcare system.

4 • 
Avatar image for MigGui
MigGui

2032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

@makchady: it never ceases to dumbfound me how the US doesn't have healthcare for its citizens. Both Brazil (where I was born) and Canada (where I live now) have universal healthcare.

2 • 
Avatar image for rasterror
rasterror

3696

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

@MigGui: Because Nixon made it so that health care could be a business.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for bubbahax
BubbaHax

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@rasterror: Actually, it was Ted Kennedy that created HMOs. When I was a kid you just paid the doctor when you went and it wasn't very expensive.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for DETfaninATL
DETfaninATL

602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

Edited By DETfaninATL

@MigGui: I wouldn't tout Canada's healthcare system. My wife is Canadian and I saw what that system did to her mother when she had brain cancer. It's nothing to crow about. Not even close. I'm not saying America's is perfect - it absolutely has it's share of problems - but then again, whose is?

3 • 
Avatar image for MigGui
MigGui

2032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

@DETfaninATL: Canada has free healthcare, but still has paid healthcare on top of it. Free healthcare offers a baseline. It allows people without a job to not have to choose between risking dying or getting a $50,000 bill to treat Covid, it allows people with diabetes or HIV to know they will get their medication without interruption. But the best, cutting edge technology will always be gated behind a paywall, that doesn’t change anywhere

Upvote • 
Avatar image for santinegrete
santinegrete

7085

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

@MigGui: yeah, it's almost tragic. Like "swollen, bruised and splattered by my own blood, but let me off the ambulance, I CAN'T PAY YOU, I don't have a job".

Upvote • 
Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By blaznwiipspman1

@makchady: single payer is cheaper than the current private system. It's just the way it is because of all the rules and regulations like patents trademarks, ip, licensing, labour laws and so on. If we didn't have those, a private Healthcare system would make sense. But we do have those laws and single payer makes much more sense. Unless you're able to scrap those regulations, that will always be the case

3 • 
Avatar image for bubbahax
BubbaHax

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@blaznwiipspman1: I was in the hospital for two weeks last summer. Open heart surgery. I was a little concerned with what it was all going to cost. But my final bill was only $100. Insurance covered everything.

I've heard stories of people waiting months for life saving procedures under single payer systems. No thanks.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@bubbahax: I'm pretty sure open heart surgery procedures are moved to the top of the list, doesn't matter what kind of health care system you use. But I do know that the Healthcare here is a scam. My cousin and her family pay almost $25k per year for health insurance. I'm paying a lot less, but thats only because my deductible is so high.

I've heard of people having to sell their homes and live on the street because of medical expenses due to cancer treatment. Alot of times, these people wish they had died instead of having to suffer and wiping out their family inheritance. Very sad.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for BoSnerdly
BoSnerdly

184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@makchady: Actually, they all support a single entity with all the control and money for everything... the government (themselves).

2 •