Battlefield 3 is a hell of a war game and i love it, terrific sound effects, excellent gameplay, and the campaign blew me away it was amazing. The graphics were incredible in the campaign, the story line was very good and took some thinking, it was sort of like call of duty black ops' campaign how the guy was getting interrogated and the battles you fight in as gameplay are flashbacks from the soldier except for 2(the very first mission and the last mission). It was an incredible campaign i loved it, im about to go back on it to get more achievements and beat it on hard or extreme what ever the hardest difficulty is called i dont know it by heart but anyway the multiplayer which im playing as i type this is also very fun to play, in my opinion i think battlefield 3 is much better than call of duty for a few reasons: one because battlefield is a war game that actually takes skill to play, unlike in call of duty, the first time i played mw3 i got like 4 different kill streaks in the matter of 10 minutes. In Battlefield 3 it took me a couple of games to even get good at it, i like how theres no kill streaks its just straight shooting, dont got multiple planes in the air shooting at you every step you take. Modern Warfare 2 added to many kill streaks in the game, i didnt mind the 3, 5 ,7 kill streak in call of duty 4 modern warfare, i loved that game alot i would play that non stop. Then when they came out with modern warfare 2 i was so pumped up for months, then it came out and i loved it for the first few weeks, then it started getting boring and i started getting bullspitted constantly by the 200 kill streaks they added in, it wasnt necessary to put so many kill streaks, i wouldnt mind 3, 5, 7, 15, 25. 5 kill streaks thats all you need infinity ward, and then they add death streaks ? why ? why reward a player for doing bad, because they feel bad ? They shouldn't, if your not doing good then do better on your own not by these stupid death streaks which dont even work for me but they work terrific for other players. In my opinion Modern Warfare 2 multiplayer should of stayed close to Modern Warfare 1's multiplayer. All the attachments for the guns were good and there were multiple attachments to choose from to put on your gun, but they shouldnt of made shottys a secondary weapon but i heard they took that out of MW3 so thats good they actually made a good change to the game, im just pissed because modern warfare 1 is a classic and was a crazy incredible game and modern warfare 2 had that chance to but couldnt live up to the hype, then modern warfare 3 i wasnt even excited for, i still dont even own it and dont plan to untill the price drops to like 30$ and i dont care if i have to wait a few months because im in no rush to get it im good with battlefield 3, a true skilled game and thats why i think its better than call of duty. But back to battlefield 3, the mutliplayer is alot of fun, alot of guns to choose from, graphics are nice on multiplayer but i think there better in the campaign. Battlefield all around is a terrific game and i highly recommend it. Well if your still reading this thank you for reading it and enjoy to comment about your opinion, i wont take any offensive its only a video game lol alright well peace.
Other Helpful Reviews for Battlefield 3 (Limited Edition)
I like to preface my reviews by saying I'm not a fanboy. I'm a freaking gamer. I own over 50 games for Xbox 360, and a laundry list of PC games. I don't have a PS3, but I think it's a great system. I don't judge base... Read Full Review
I was actually suckered into the hype for this game this time around. The impressive visuals in the trailers, the intense fire fights and the promise of an interesting story. I got none of that in the final package. T... Read Full Review
