Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood

Now i like BIA but there is a huge problem with PS2 version. THE GRAPHICS SUCK for a system that could hold god of war.

User Rating: 7.3 | Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood PS2

By goldfront45 | Review Date: November 26, 2005

What is good about this game is that its all about brutal realism not one man saving the world. Also i love the urban combat in WW2 so that was pretty cool. The controls are amazing and the squad mechanics never felt better. The AI is amazing by the way. The problems are that the graphics suck horribly. For some reason the thompson sounds like glass shattering. The wierd thing was that it came out the the same year as the first one so thats pretty weird. Listen to me stick to the xbox or PC one.
The music also annoyed me they tried to like steal the music from saving private ryan.

Other Helpful Reviews for Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood

• Rating:9.5

  Earned in Blood is one of the best WWII games you could ever play. This is one game you don't want to miss out on.

  By bigd575 | Review Date: Apr 15, 2010 | PS2

  Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood seems like it isn't popular. But that doesn't mean that it isn't a really fantastic World War 2 Game at all. To me Earned in Blood is a lot better than Road to Hill 30. This game is also... Read Full Review

  5 of 5 users found the following review helpful
• Rating:9.4

  You people who rated BIA:EIB crappy need to shut it! It is not a freaking sequel, get that through your heads.

  By Jonnyonthespot | Review Date: Nov 13, 2005 | PS2

  I don't know what you people are talking about?! The creators said the game wasn't really a sequel, it was just taking place from another persons view. Instead of following Baker it follows Hartsock, because people wer... Read Full Review

  2 of 2 users found the following review helpful