This was a game that was very difficult and challenging to complete. The story was good, but it seems like the only reason I was able to complete it was they felt sorry for me after a few reloads and healed up my squadron and myself. I have never seen such accurate enemies and inaccurate shots of my own. The checkpoint system of saving makes it that more difficult. Why are games still doing this? I need to be able to save just about after I kill every enemie to make any progress. Each mission took one to two hours do to this. I was glad to beat it, but also glad it was over. This will likely be my last Brothers in Arms game that I play. If they added a save anywhere component it would be the only way I would consider another of these type of games. Sometimes I don't have one to two hours to devote to gaming. This type of save game option needs to be eliminated permanently.
Other Helpful Reviews for Brothers in Arms: Earned in Blood
Brothers in Arms Earned in Blood, is the first sequel to Road to Hill 30 that came out earlier this year. In that game you played Sgt. Matt Baker. In EiB you play as Red Hartsock, a soldier that was under Matt Baker... Read Full Review
The campaign begins under the eyes of Joe "Red" Hartsock. Hartsock fought with Mike Baker (the main character of Road to Hill 30) and you will find yourself joining and separating yourself from his squad throug... Read Full Review
