It seems like everyone who reviewed Call of Duty 4 has forgotten that a game called Call of Duty 2 existed. As someone whos played 100+ hours on both games, i cannot help but notice the similarities despite the changing of eras. Some of the same sounds (plant sound, for example in search and destroy), same texturing, etc. Apparently they recycled many elements. Not that this is bad though, as CoD 2 was an excellent game and they improved on some of its flaws. Yes, the AI still sucks. Yes, its still linear. But, that does not make it less of a shooter. I think CoD 2's single player campaign was more "epic" at some points, but CoD 4's was better paced. The short length helped it in this case as i felt like i played through just the right amount of action without it getting tedious. Multiplayer is excellent, but i think everyone who bought CoD 4 knew that (although it isnt BF 2).
Other Helpful Reviews for Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare
When I first heard the next installment in the Call of Duty franchise would not be in World War II, but in modern times, I didn't know what to think. I for one am not too keen on modern warfare games and I didn't know i... Read Full Review
Call of Duty has left its roots in the World War II era. The next installment in the series, Call of Duty 4, is set in modern times. No longer will you be gunning down German’s on the beaches on D’Day. Now you will be fi... Read Full Review
