Blockbaster returns

User Rating: 9 | Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 PC
Autumn… new Call of Duty… all will be playing new Call of Duty. This words should know every educated gamer. It is true, because there some banality in the release of each new CoD. Since 2007 every developer tries to get the bar of quality of "Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare" from Infinity Ward. In 2008 Treyarch with Call of Duty World at War couldn't do it, but in 2009 Modern Warfare 2(from Infinity Ward too) was very close to it and Black Ops in 2010 from Treyarch was just better than World at War. In 2011 Infinity Ward is back after the scandal with the profit of MF 2 and retirement of leading developers. But now it's not so important. According by Sledgehammer Games and Raven Software, Modern Warfare 3 is closer than ever to the success Modern Warfare 4.
The story continues no longer after the events of Modern Warfare 2. "Soap" MacTavish and Capitan Price charged in all bad deals, Russian Extremists going to invade the USA, Makarov is back again. All in all, World is on the brink of collapse. Like all time in Modern Warfare. The action doesn't take much time to wait and the first mission starts at the heart of the Manhattan, at the hell of war. As in previous parts we will play for different propagandists, for example United States jarhead "Frost" or Russian President Guard Kaharov. The area of battles, as always is very different: from big cities such as New-York, London and Paris to Sierra-Leone and Somali. All locations did very well and sometimes it's just interesting to look around and watch the scenery.
After Call of Duty 4, graphics have not being the best side of series. Ignoring all negative comments of IW Engine, Infinity Ward corrects it a bit and develops new Modern Warfare. In 2011 it looks not so bad, but it defeats to the nearest enemy in the face of Battlefield 3. Scripts play the same role in gameplay, making special cut scenes, but many people say, that in 2011 its time to give players more freedom. Isn't it? No. Especially this scenes make Call of Duty Special. Many blames little maps in multiplayer – in Battlefield there are real battle fields and much, much more huge space. Do we need this? Have tanks and Helicopters? For what? For real warfare? Go to army. You think sound is still are not so real and like in movies? You have heard real? Want some more? Go to army.
Now you think that all this problems were in previous CoD Series. Yes, it is, because problems are the same! Call of Duty doesn't changes much from year to year. Where is the progress? It is not much. Do you think is bad? Of Course not. While graphics are bad, warfare is not so realistic, every year we get real blockbuster with memorable action moments and events, a great story. Games should not substitute reality, it should complement it. Call of Duty gives us ultimate chance to become a hero of Hollywood action movie without any boring details and specification of events.
When I said that Modern Warfare 3 is very close to Modern Warfare exaggerate. Of Course, not. Furthermore, it's worse than Modern Warfare2, because the game only changed a story (a bit too!) and some make up, althou MF3 is very close to Mf2. It is a magnificent game, but a bit all parts are bit worse, than in MF2.
All in all, we get a perfect continuing of the story and a very well new Call of Duty. Much, much better than previous - Black ops. Infinity Ward proved, that they are still best in CoD and maybe in shooters too… Cinematic shooter surely. While DICE creates a detail, complex and very technological, but heartless shooter, in Modern Warfare 3 we just have great fun, like on a playground but with previously devised scenes. This is in some form a feature film.