This is by far the worst game in the Call of Duty series, and I'm thinking of a bottom list classification in the top WW2 games as well. It often looks like the scenery of a cheap mindless carnage flic. The terms "repetitive" and "linear" don't even begin to portray the quality of the action. The realism is a joke, from the superhero that blasts everyone with the flamethrower and then walks through fire like the cyborg from Terminator, to the Mother of All Tanks, who kills 4 German 88 guns and countless Panzer V and Panther tanks (as well as hilarious combinations between the two models) . The AI reminds me of Castle Wolfenstein (yeah, the '90s :D ) and the lame use of the "Enemy at the gates" script is almost as incredible and appalling as the score it got on Gamespot. :( Disappointing, really. You cannot seriously compare this with Brothers in Arms or even their own Modern Combat.
Other Helpful Reviews for Call of Duty: World at War
It would be hard to immediately identify something as a World War II game with the absence of Nazis. In fact, the absence of Nazis is what potentially could have led Treyarch's latest iteration of the Call of Duty franch... Read Full Review
The Call of Duty franchise has once again returned to it's World War II roots. This release pays respect to the Pacific Theatre of Operations and delves once again back into the major conflicts of the Eastern Front. T... Read Full Review
