Call of Duty: World at War

Great WWII game but as FPS Killzone 2 is much better

User Rating: 8 | Call of Duty: World at War PS3

By Rsoub | Review Date: January 2, 2011

first time i played call of duty 1 in 2003 i was shocked the game was amazing, but each year there is new game every year thats boring.
the truth am not fan of call of duty, only 1 is better, the reason that i dont like call of duty that there is no stealth, everyone know where you are, if you walk slowly or hidden everyone is shooting at you.
there is now way let your freind shooting right side and you surprise you enemy in left side.
this mistake its in all call of duty.
in killzone 2 your enemy dosnt know where you are ,just when they see you only and if you make noise they come.
this is stealth in FPS.
if you are fan of call of duty well this is great game like all but not for me.
the game is fun burning japanise and killing nazi and special nazi zombie mode
the great fun is the CO OP and competetive mode and online.
have fun

Other Helpful Reviews for Call of Duty: World at War

• Rating:10

  ok nat bad this game 10/10 good game ! I played MW 1 and 2 after I played this game. I am just much more enticed by the

  By SASUKE-54 | Review Date: Dec 21, 2009 | PS3

  I played MW 1 and 2 after I played this game. I am just much more enticed by the story of WW2, and this game really sucked me in. The graphics here are good! They look way better than MW 1 (which was only in 720p). Th... Read Full Review

  7 of 8 users found the following review helpful
• Rating:8.5

  Call of Duty: World at War shows that World War 2 shooters are not dead.....at least not yet.

  By pspitus | Review Date: Feb 01, 2009 | PS3

  War. War never changes. World War 2 never changes. World War 2 games never change, well….that's until Call of Duty: World at War arrived on the scene. Call of Duty: World at War revolves around the infamous events of Wor... Read Full Review

  4 of 4 users found the following review helpful