Call of Duty: World at War

User Rating: 8 | Call of Duty: World at War PS3
By WAG23 | Review Date:
Well, i basically played this game at my friend's house on co-op and we beat in like 5 or 6 hours. It was kind of too short and it didn't persuade the gamer into liking the game. You can't experience a lot in just 6 hours. I don't know about other gamers but that's how fast i went through the game. Maybe the solo campaign is a little different and maybe it's even longer, but i haven't played it. So, the length of the game should have been improved. Just like its' predeccesor Call of Duty 4, the length of the game is still short. Call of Duty 4 was actually longer than people said it is. Anyways, the graphics are pretty good and it has a lot of graphic stuff in the game. It's really gory and bloody and not appropriate for little kids. There's also a brutal torture scene at the very beginning which is very disturbing. So yes, the game is still pretty violent and filled with F-bombs and S-bombs and still intense like the 4th, but there is still some things that should have just been improved. Sometimes, the game gives you no hints at what you have to do and you're just thinking for half a freakin' hour! I mean c'mon. This isn't a frikkin' stupid puzzle game. It's technically a shooter! It's not supposed to have moments where you have to THINK. The story is not as good as the 4th one's. We're still killing freaking nazis and just going through Germany like the other COD's before the 4th one. So, Activision didn't change a lot. Finally, we could play as Russians though. We get to play as Americans and Russians and they both get kind of repetitive at times though. The ending is kind of odd and not as good of an ending as Call of Duty 4 and the last level isn't as engaging as Call of Duty 4's. So, i just advise you to rent the game and see if it's worth all the hype and then buy it if it really is which it's not.

Other Helpful Reviews for Call of Duty: World at War

Load Comments (0)