COD, back to WW II, this is the way game is suppose to be, good to see a different theater of WW II in this game.

User Rating: 9.5 | Call of Duty: World at War PS3
By Hugh_Hef | Review Date:
COD World at War, what can I say about the best WW II first person shooter series of all time (some may beg to differ)? It was good to see a different theater of the war (finally). I know that was a big leap for the COD series and it definitely set this particular game apart from the rest in the series. The banzai attacks are crazy, and I love the counter attack on those, and who can't love the flame thrower, running up to the bunkers, blasting away with the fire, (hells yeah). I noticed two key features that World at War, carried over form Modern Warfare, which are the shooting through walls, creates, and other substrates, that in real life you could shoot through, which makes the game more realistic, and the push to make the gamer more aggressive in battle, by bum rushing the enemies locations instead of hunkering down and picking them off one by one, these are two key features, and I have really liked them in both games. On annoying thing is the darn grenades, I don't know if it just me, but it seemed that the enemies grenades were more accurate than mine and my allies, mainly just wanted to point that out. Overall I have been very satisfied by this game, I believe it tops modern warfare, mainly because COD belongs in the WW II theaters of war its just more fun. Don't get me wrong I enjoyed Modern Warfare, but it just didn't seem right though. If we could do a Modern Warfare with true historic data (such as operation desert storm, etc.) instead of the so called future or fictional wars, I believe then the modern Warfare would be a more enjoyable game (in the Historical sense). I was definitely surprise by how graphic this game turned out, I just didn't expect it, really added a more realistic aspect to it though. Thanks Activision

Other Helpful Reviews for Call of Duty: World at War

Load Comments (0)