Official TINAU Admin Thread

Avatar image for comradex
comradex

3426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 comradex
Member since 2003 • 3426 Posts

I would like to take this moment to congratulate all members and officers of TINAU. We are turning into a cool group of people. One thing we need, is make sure everyone is getting the most out of TINAU. This thread, I hope ;), is where we can deal with administration issues and comments. I hope that I and the other officers and responsible members can post progress reports and other misc admin stuff here.

The first thing I'd like to post is the efforts MCM and I are making in response to questions about becoming officers. I agree that we need some general guidelines in this area. WF has been unavailable lately but no worries we all can handle what needs to be done.

Several officers have been MIA, hopefully some will get stuff sorted out and will return ASAP. I sent this message to some of the officers:

"Michael theCM and I are trying to get activity back up at TINAU. We want to have all the officers active. If you feel like you cant perform the duties of an officer anymore PM Whiteflame and let him know. We're going to give all the officers two weeks to contact us. Thanks for your help!"

Suggestions for guidelines and improvements are welcome. And no we're not getting structure here at TINAU we are trying to have some fun!

Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#2 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts
i have nothing to add. you did it all. great job comradex 8)
Avatar image for comradex
comradex

3426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 comradex
Member since 2003 • 3426 Posts

I would like to talk about officer guidelines. I recommended k_smooth as an officer to WF and I said ur ok with it mcm. The reasons that qualify k_smooth as an officer is #1 his activity, #2 his awesomeness, #3 he has balls.

People come and go on GS all the time even officers. So I was thinking that if an officer hasn't posted on here or pm'd anyone as to why, they should be replaced with a qualified active member. Any thoughts?

Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#4 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts
yeah thats pretty good. i totally want KS to be an officer. however idk about the whole replaced thing. if we have some officers that are not active, they should definitely be demoted. However, i dont know if they should be replaced unless there is a worthy member. I dont think any member should just get officer status just b/c we have to replace the old ones. hope that makes sense.
Avatar image for comradex
comradex

3426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 comradex
Member since 2003 • 3426 Posts

Good point. So if an officer hasn't been active for a specific amount of time, then they should be demoted. Replacement is up to the leader, WF .

The nice thing about demotions is that the person still is a member. Maybe they can come back and be an officer again :).

How long can a person be inactive before their demoted? I was thinking about a 1 - 3 months?

Avatar image for hisfamily
hisfamily

6459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 hisfamily
Member since 2007 • 6459 Posts
I want Bakalou to become a Officer. I sent a request to WF.
Avatar image for comradex
comradex

3426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 comradex
Member since 2003 • 3426 Posts
I would like everyone who deserves it to be an officer :). Did you consult anyone before you pm'd WF? He gets kind-of irritated sometimes. Believe me I know ;).
Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#8 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts

Good point. So if an officer hasn't been active for a specific amount of time, then they should be demoted. Replacement is up to the leader, WF .

The nice thing about demotions is that the person still is a member. Maybe they can come back and be an officer again :).

How long can a person be inactive before their demoted? I was thinking about a 1 - 3 months?

comradex
1-3 months!?!?! wow thats really long! i was thinking maybe 2 -3 weeks (unless they notify WF with a really good reason)
Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#9 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts
I would like everyone who deserves it to be an officer :). Did you consult anyone before you pm'd WF? He gets kind-of irritated sometimes. Believe me I know ;).comradex
haha i also have first hand experience. not a very enjoyable experience :P
Avatar image for comradex
comradex

3426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 comradex
Member since 2003 • 3426 Posts

1-3 months!?!?! wow thats really long! i was thinking maybe 2 -3 weeks (unless they notify WF with a really good reason)
MichaeltheCM

I was just throwing some numbers out there. I was thinking about the time WF's dad didn't want him on here and he was gone for a long time. 3 weeks sounds good. People should pm the leader if their going to be gone longer than that. Unless its a disaster or something.

Avatar image for epayps2
epayps2

3129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 epayps2
Member since 2005 • 3129 Posts
Am I an admin? I went to the home page one of the buttons said "Join". Does that mean I never joined, or is it a glitch?
Avatar image for comradex
comradex

3426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 comradex
Member since 2003 • 3426 Posts

Am I an admin? I went to the home page one of the buttons said "Join". Does that mean I never joined, or is it a glitch?epayps2

Your not a admin, short for administration ;). Yes if the button said "Join" then you hadn't joined the union. I'll look to see if you joined today. Feel free to post admin questions and comments here any time epayps. We're not like other unions that have those officer only clubs or meetings!

Avatar image for comradex
comradex

3426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 comradex
Member since 2003 • 3426 Posts
@epayps: It says you joined TINAU on January 12, 2008. So the "Join" button you saw must have been a glitch.
Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#14 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts
Am I an admin? I went to the home page one of the buttons said "Join". Does that mean I never joined, or is it a glitch?epayps2
yeah its a glitch. it does the same for me
Avatar image for grafkhun
grafkhun

12827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#15 grafkhun
Member since 2006 • 12827 Posts
i guess this thread about covers it. demotion for officers should be absolutely no activity for 2 weeks with no warning or message to any of us telling us in advance. if an officer is away for 2 months but sends us a PM or whatever saying that then its all cool still.
Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#16 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts
idk i think 2 weeks is kind of a short time. i was leaning towards 3 weeks, but is that too long?
Avatar image for grafkhun
grafkhun

12827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#17 grafkhun
Member since 2006 • 12827 Posts
nah 2 weeks i think. but we can put a poll or something if you want and see what other officers think.
Avatar image for comradex
comradex

3426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 comradex
Member since 2003 • 3426 Posts

i guess this thread about covers it. demotion for officers should be absolutely no activity for 2 weeks with no warning or message to any of us telling us in advance. if an officer is away for 2 months but sends us a PM or whatever saying that then its all cool still.grafkhun

Two weeks of no activity sounds fair, but I think they should be warned at least once in an official pm. We should follow principles and not adhere strictly to rules. Necessity should be tempered with kindness in my opinion.

So here is the proposal: An officer that is inactive for two weeks, without contacting the leader or other officer beforehand, should be sent an official message informing them of their pending demotion and asking them to resume activity.

Sound good?

Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#19 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts

[QUOTE="grafkhun"]i guess this thread about covers it. demotion for officers should be absolutely no activity for 2 weeks with no warning or message to any of us telling us in advance. if an officer is away for 2 months but sends us a PM or whatever saying that then its all cool still.comradex

Two weeks of no activity sounds fair, but I think they should be warned at least once in an official pm. We should follow principles and not adhere strictly to rules. Necessity should be tempered with kindness in my opinion.

So here is the proposal: An officer that is inactive for two weeks, without contacting the leader or other officer beforehand, should be sent an official message informing them of their pending demotion and asking them to resume activity.

Sound good?

sounds very good. I would also like a question in that PM as to why they were inactive. Also i would like to see a rule that if a person gets 3 or more notifications (PM's) they should be demoted b/c that means they are not contributing enough
Avatar image for WhiteFlame-XIII
WhiteFlame-XIII

4610

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#20 WhiteFlame-XIII
Member since 2007 • 4610 Posts
I was thinking 2 weeks of leave that was unexplained before and sometimes after the leave. After that, there is 1 week to respond to the requested PM.
Avatar image for comradex
comradex

3426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 comradex
Member since 2003 • 3426 Posts
[QUOTE="comradex"]

So here is the proposal: An officer that is inactive for two weeks, without contacting the leader or other officer beforehand, should be sent an official message informing them of their pending demotion and asking them to resume activity.

MichaeltheCM

I would also like a question in that PM as to why they were inactive. Also i would like to see a rule that if a person gets 3 or more notifications (PM's) they should be demoted b/c that means they are not contributing enough

Sounds very fair

I was thinking 2 weeks of leave that was unexplained before and sometimes after the leave. After that, there is 1 week to respond to the requested PM.WhiteFlame-XIII

Proposal: An officer that is inactive for two weeks, unexplained, should be, during this time, sent three official PM's informing them of their pending demotion and asking them as to why they are absent and to please resume activity.

Further additions? Perhaps someone could write it better than my attempt?

Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#22 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts
I was thinking 2 weeks of leave that was unexplained before and sometimes after the leave. After that, there is 1 week to respond to the requested PM.WhiteFlame-XIII
seems reasonable and ur the boss so there we have it
Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#23 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts

Proposal: An officer that is inactive for two weeks, unexplained, should be, during this time, sent three official PM's informing them of their pending demotion and asking them as to why they are absent and to please resume activity.

Further additions? Perhaps someone could write it better than my attempt?

comradex
why do they need to be sent 3 PM's?
Avatar image for comradex
comradex

3426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 comradex
Member since 2003 • 3426 Posts

i would like to see a rule that if a person gets 3 or more notifications (PM's) they should be demoted b/c that means they are not contributing enough
MichaeltheCM
i thought u wanted 3 pms? I must have misunderstood. I'll make it just one again ;)

Avatar image for grafkhun
grafkhun

12827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#25 grafkhun
Member since 2006 • 12827 Posts
yeah 1 PM is enough, well its settled i guess.
Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#26 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts

[QUOTE="MichaeltheCM"] i would like to see a rule that if a person gets 3 or more notifications (PM's) they should be demoted b/c that means they are not contributing enough
comradex

i thought u wanted 3 pms? I must have misunderstood. I'll make it just one again ;)

no i was trying to say, if they get a total of 3 PM's from officers telling them to be active they should be demoded. For example, say a person is an officer. he is active at first then for two weeks (without notice) he is absent. we send him a PM telling him to be active. he comes back and is active for a while and then for another two weeks (without notice) he is inactive. we send him another PM telling him to be active. he comes back and is active for a while but then again is inactive for a two week period. we PM him a third time telling him he hit his 3rd strike and will be demoded. does that make sense? is it a good idea?
Avatar image for comradex
comradex

3426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 comradex
Member since 2003 • 3426 Posts
I guess so. But it could be used as an excuse to get rid of someone in the future. If three pms are sent, as in the scenirio above, the leader and most of the officers would have to agree that the person is not pulling their weight. That way a powercrazy person cant just send three pms and get someone kicked out. Im being paranoid but its possible.
Avatar image for hisfamily
hisfamily

6459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 hisfamily
Member since 2007 • 6459 Posts
OK.
Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#29 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts
I guess so. But it could be used as an excuse to get rid of someone in the future. If three pms are sent, as in the scenirio above, the leader and most of the officers would have to agree that the person is not pulling their weight. That way a powercrazy person cant just send three pms and get someone kicked out. Im being paranoid but its possible. comradex
yeah that sounds good. alright i think we're good here :)
Avatar image for comradex
comradex

3426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 comradex
Member since 2003 • 3426 Posts
Treeman over a CW has "special" emblems for his union. What does everyone think about that? Should we do something like that?
Avatar image for hisfamily
hisfamily

6459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 hisfamily
Member since 2007 • 6459 Posts
Huh?
Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#32 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts
Treeman over a CW has "special" emblems for his union. What does everyone think about that? Should we do something like that?comradex
well i personally think those things are really pointless so i dont think its a good idea
Avatar image for comradex
comradex

3426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 comradex
Member since 2003 • 3426 Posts
Thats kind of true, and I would have to make them so unless people really wanted something like that Im just too lazy to get it going ;)
Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#34 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts
Thats kind of true, and I would have to make them so unless people really wanted something like that Im just too lazy to get it going ;)comradex
well if any of the other officers want to do it feel free guys :)
Avatar image for Bakalou
Bakalou

2095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#35 Bakalou
Member since 2005 • 2095 Posts
That's funny, I got promoted at the start of two days of not being able to get on the net. Anyway, what if somebody goes on a two week vacation? I've done that before b/c it was to another country across the Atlantic.
Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#36 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts
That's funny, I got promoted at the start of two days of not being able to get on the net. Anyway, what if somebody goes on a two week vacation? I've done that before b/c it was to another country across the Atlantic.Bakalou
u just need to give us a heads up thats all :) oh sweet! ur an officer! congrats dude :D
Avatar image for comradex
comradex

3426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 comradex
Member since 2003 • 3426 Posts
Wow! congrats Bak! I wonder if k_smoove got promoted
Avatar image for grafkhun
grafkhun

12827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#38 grafkhun
Member since 2006 • 12827 Posts
comrade- its theeman not treeman. and the emblem thing is kinda interesting but naw, i dont think we need it.
Avatar image for comradex
comradex

3426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 comradex
Member since 2003 • 3426 Posts
comrade- its theeman not treeman. and the emblem thing is kinda interesting but naw, i dont think we need it.grafkhun
:lol: yea i noticed that the other day, but im always right so im just gonna call him that ;)
Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#40 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts
Wow! congrats Bak! I wonder if k_smoove got promotedcomradex
apparently not :|
Avatar image for grafkhun
grafkhun

12827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#41 grafkhun
Member since 2006 • 12827 Posts

[QUOTE="grafkhun"]comrade- its theeman not treeman. and the emblem thing is kinda interesting but naw, i dont think we need it.comradex
:lol: yea i noticed that the other day, but im always right so im just gonna call him that ;)

:? w/e :P

Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#42 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts

:? w/e :P

grafkhun
way to accept life graf :P
Avatar image for comradex
comradex

3426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 comradex
Member since 2003 • 3426 Posts
The sooner he accepts comradex's point of view the better it will be for him ;)
Avatar image for grafkhun
grafkhun

12827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#44 grafkhun
Member since 2006 • 12827 Posts
oh im no where near accepting your POV, im just playing along making you beleive i am... whoops shouldn't of said that :P
Avatar image for comradex
comradex

3426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 comradex
Member since 2003 • 3426 Posts
I admire your bravery, I'm just trying to save you from yourself :P
Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#46 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts
oh im no where near accepting your POV, im just playing along making you beleive i am... whoops shouldn't of said that :Pgrafkhun
nice new sig :)
Avatar image for comradex
comradex

3426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 comradex
Member since 2003 • 3426 Posts

oh im no where near accepting your POV, im just playing along making you beleive i am... whoops shouldn't of said that :Pgrafkhun

its pretty

Avatar image for grafkhun
grafkhun

12827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#48 grafkhun
Member since 2006 • 12827 Posts
gamah_killah made all 3 of them :D he's really good at animated sigs, hell he made my banner as well.
Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#49 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts
gamah_killah made all 3 of them :D he's really good at animated sigs, hell he made my banner as well. grafkhun
cool :)
Avatar image for grafkhun
grafkhun

12827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#50 grafkhun
Member since 2006 • 12827 Posts
^ yup, did you make your own sig mikey? (your new nickname)