a shooter where u can't kill...

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for CARL
CARL

651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 CARL
Member since 2002 • 651 Posts

am i boring now?

anyhow.. id like to develop an action adventure where you can't kill enemies.. if u kill an enemy it's game over.. u can neutralize an enemy with a shot, but that's it.. also the avatar u play as wont shoot at npcs..

is this stupid?

yeah.. maybe it is, but it's worth a thought none the less..

Avatar image for mosa922
mosa922

749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#2 mosa922
Member since 2007 • 749 Posts
How would the game be action if cool things arent going on ( killing people ). I dont think this would be a good game.
Avatar image for muthsera666
muthsera666

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#3 muthsera666
Member since 2005 • 13271 Posts

How would the game be action if cool things arent going on ( killing people ). I dont think this would be a good game.mosa922

Could be like a police takedown game. Death does not have to be included in the idea of action. Look at the Pokemon craze. They fall asleep when they run out of hit points...

Avatar image for KrAzY_cHrIs
KrAzY_cHrIs

1132

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 KrAzY_cHrIs
Member since 2007 • 1132 Posts
Arn't you justsubstituting the word kill for neutralizing
Avatar image for Scurrydog
Scurrydog

1583

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 Scurrydog
Member since 2003 • 1583 Posts
Um.. Splinter Cell !:D (even though u still get to kill people later on and stuff.)
Avatar image for MKHavoc
MKHavoc

1100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 MKHavoc
Member since 2007 • 1100 Posts
The only way I could see anyone shooting without killing people is if they were using a camera.
Avatar image for X-Fade
X-Fade

2681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 X-Fade
Member since 2006 • 2681 Posts
Broken Sword..? o_0
Avatar image for yodariquo
yodariquo

6631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 39

User Lists: 0

#8 yodariquo
Member since 2005 • 6631 Posts
I'm all for tactical shooters, and that's a unique take. I always shoot the enemies in RE4 in the ankle first to take them down, anyway ;)
Avatar image for 190586385885857957282413308806
190586385885857957282413308806

13084

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 116

User Lists: 0

#9 190586385885857957282413308806
Member since 2002 • 13084 Posts

SO you're talking about making a FPW?

a first person wounder...

hmmm doesn't have a ring to it

Avatar image for AtomicTangerine
AtomicTangerine

4413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 AtomicTangerine
Member since 2005 • 4413 Posts
Thief already did this in 1998. Sorry.
Avatar image for CARL
CARL

651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 CARL
Member since 2002 • 651 Posts

Thief already did this in 1998. Sorry.AtomicTangerine

is it game over in thief when u accidentally kill someone in that game?

Avatar image for CARL
CARL

651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 CARL
Member since 2002 • 651 Posts
i checked out the review.. it doesn't seem like there is a game over when u kill someone.. it doesn't even penalize the player.. it's a stealth game.. so... mister, ure wrong :D :P 8-) B-P
Avatar image for LordAndrew
LordAndrew

7355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 LordAndrew
Member since 2005 • 7355 Posts

Sometimes in XIII, you're told not to kill "innocents". They shoot at you, but if you shoot them, you get a Game Over. You can smash them with chairs to knock them out, though. :D

I don't really recommend playing XIII though.

Avatar image for StealthRaiden
StealthRaiden

185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#14 StealthRaiden
Member since 2007 • 185 Posts
You should make a game like that but rate it C for children.
Avatar image for ThePostalWorker
ThePostalWorker

839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 ThePostalWorker
Member since 2006 • 839 Posts
SWAT 4 is kinda like that. I never played it, but i think if you use non lethal weapons, your get better ranks.
Avatar image for Soothsayerr
Soothsayerr

196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Soothsayerr
Member since 2006 • 196 Posts
Pokemon Snap.
Avatar image for Netherscourge
Netherscourge

16364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 Netherscourge
Member since 2003 • 16364 Posts

am i boring now?

anyhow.. id like to develop an action adventure where you can't kill enemies.. if u kill an enemy it's game over.. u can neutralize an enemy with a shot, but that's it.. also the avatar u play as wont shoot at npcs..

is this stupid?

yeah.. maybe it is, but it's worth a thought none the less..

CARL

Super Mario Brothers - nobody ever dies because they keep coming back in sequels.

Avatar image for AtomicTangerine
AtomicTangerine

4413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 AtomicTangerine
Member since 2005 • 4413 Posts

[QUOTE="AtomicTangerine"]Thief already did this in 1998. Sorry.CARL

is it game over in thief when u accidentally kill someone in that game?

Yep, if you play it on the hardest difficulty, (which is what the game is designed for anyway) killing somebody in most of the levels results in you losing. There are some levels where you square off against non-human foes and you can kill them, but for most of the game you can't kill what is trying to kill you.

Avatar image for KreepLX
KreepLX

313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#19 KreepLX
Member since 2004 • 313 Posts
I like the idea. Like a guy sneaking around with a hypo putting people to sleep or else their monitors go off. I saw another idea in here that had something to do with cops. A change up every once in a while is good. Violence will always reign supreme because it is our nature and will be until big brother takes it all away and we enter a world similar to Demolition Man.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#20 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Thief already did this in 1998. Sorry.AtomicTangerine


Yep, and it did it extremely well too.
Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#21 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts

I think this is a great idea.

I think it's the idea that Hideo Kojima had for the first 3 MGS games, seeing as the player gets a higher score if less enemies are taken out...minus the game over

I actually enjoyed not taking out people. It made the game much more interesting for me.

That idea led me to play through Hulk: Ultimate Destruction's missions while hurting as few people as possible after I got all of his powers. It gave me something to do.

Avatar image for twopic58
twopic58

3710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#23 twopic58
Member since 2007 • 3710 Posts
Um...mayb....no. That game would suck.
Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts
Like others have said, Thief does this on the hardest setting. You're not allowed to kill anyone, innocents or guards, otherwise, its game over.
Avatar image for CARL
CARL

651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 CARL
Member since 2002 • 651 Posts

well then MAYBE i should check that game out..

i have to of course :P

Avatar image for southy787
southy787

14571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 southy787
Member since 2005 • 14571 Posts
So it's like everyone is a hostage in an FPS or something? Sounds like it would be pretty difficult to implement and frustrating, but games need more innovation.
Avatar image for W3dotCOM
W3dotCOM

1942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 W3dotCOM
Member since 2005 • 1942 Posts

am i boring now?

anyhow.. id like to develop an action adventure where you can't kill enemies.. if u kill an enemy it's game over.. u can neutralize an enemy with a shot, but that's it.. also the avatar u play as wont shoot at npcs..

is this stupid?

yeah.. maybe it is, but it's worth a thought none the less..

CARL

They hve one, its Called Metal Gear Solid.
(you get the idea)

Avatar image for CARL
CARL

651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 CARL
Member since 2002 • 651 Posts

ok, i just thought that in all these stealth games u get a game over if u get cought, and that often is the case if u make a lot of noise and kill guards and things like that.. this game wouldn't penalize u for getting cought, it wouldn't need to be a stealth game, u simply got penalized for killing someone in the game, killing would be forbidden.. that's all.. i think a lot of people here get mixed up with "not getting cought" and "not kill"

but yeah, maybe thiefs hard setting doesn't allow the player to kill guards, i have to check that out.. not that i think that i can find thief anywhere so.. but it doesn't matter that much anyways..

Avatar image for 112505
112505

934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#29 112505
Member since 2006 • 934 Posts
Reminds me of SWAT IV..damn you lose heaps of points for killing people and sometimes the non lethal weapons kill too! :(
Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

ok, i just thought that in all these stealth games u get a game over if u get cought, and that often is the case if u make a lot of noise and kill guards and things like that.. this game wouldn't penalize u for getting cought, it wouldn't need to be a stealth game, u simply got penalized for killing someone in the game, killing would be forbidden.. that's all.. i think a lot of people here get mixed up with "not getting cought" and "not kill"

but yeah, maybe thiefs hard setting doesn't allow the player to kill guards, i have to check that out.. not that i think that i can find thief anywhere so.. but it doesn't matter that much anyways..

CARL

Some of the stealth games does make it so that if you do get caught you get game-over.

Thief doesnt do that though. It makes your job harder if you do get caught, now that you've got a guard chasing you, but you can still fight back, lose him in a chase, or outsmart him.

As for copies of thief, i think you can find it. It still sells, considering it is the best stealth series. MGS and Splinter Cell are good, but one is much more story oriented and other is much more action oriented. Thief is a real stealth game.

Thief 1 and 2 - the better of the series.

Thief 3

I've used that site before, and i would recommend it.

Avatar image for greenzealot
greenzealot

285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 greenzealot
Member since 2005 • 285 Posts

I live by Thief.

That is all, taffers.

Avatar image for kastanjekastere
kastanjekastere

201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#32 kastanjekastere
Member since 2003 • 201 Posts
Macgyver did this ages ago. And he was like a scout and a genious i mean WOW!