Two problems:
Games are still percieved in the US and many parts of the world as being an entertainment medium made primarily for children. While it's starting to get mainstream acceptance it has a long way to go before it's held in the same regard as movies. The idea of making AO games still equates to many as nudity/sex/violence for children.
The other problem is that AO DLC isn't a workaround for the ESRB ratings. Remember that GTA : SA's sexual context was completely inaccessible from the normal game and could only be re-enabled with a hack, but when the ESRB found out the content was potentially there they forced a reclassification of the game to AO. If your game has the potential to become AO, then the game is rated AO.
-Byshop
Byshop
Don't Sims have nude character that has their private parts blurred out.
kind of like that, but sells nude patch online. That should be able to bypass ESRB since the patch is seperate content from the retail game. They can rate the patch, but not the retail game.
If the texture of private parts is not part of the retail game, and must be downloaded then I think ESRB won't be able to lable it AO, since DLC is seperate from the actual game.
I think..
As for the perception of majority of people out there, it will always be stuck as that perception unless someone takes a step forward and make a change.
Like nudity in movies and sex in movies. No one was ok with it when it first was out, but people got used to it now. You can't always be afraid of what the population thinks in this industry.
Log in to comment