Adults Only DLC

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for TriangleHard
TriangleHard

9097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 62

User Lists: 0

#1 TriangleHard
Member since 2005 • 9097 Posts

Since companies are milking the idea of DLC, how about Adults Only DLC pack?

Basically the retail version is censored version, but if you buy DLC it unlocks uncensored version.

For price of 5 bucks, I think I'd get AO DLC packs. This way, gamers can finally have reliable access to AO games, and AO stuff is no longer doom for gaming industry.

Also this way, retail stores don't have to be burdened with carrying AO games.

As for console companies being a problem of this, I want to say they are renting R rated and Unrated movies over their online stores, so why should AO rated games be a problem on same online store?

Just thought this was good idea.

Avatar image for Legendaryscmt
Legendaryscmt

12532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Legendaryscmt
Member since 2005 • 12532 Posts

To me, I just think that there's starting to become a blur between M and AO content. From what I was told, you can have anything but simulated sex and still have a good chance at a M rating, so with that in mind, I really wouldn't care if there was AO DLC on the marketplace, since a M rated DLC could be just as bad.

Avatar image for byshop
Byshop

20504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#3 Byshop  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 20504 Posts

Two problems:

Games are still percieved in the US and many parts of the world as being an entertainment medium made primarily for children. While it's starting to get mainstream acceptance it has a long way to go before it's held in the same regard as movies. The idea of making AO games still equates to many as nudity/sex/violence for children.

The other problem is that AO DLC isn't a workaround for the ESRB ratings. Remember that GTA : SA's sexual context was completely inaccessible from the normal game and could only be re-enabled with a hack, but when the ESRB found out the content was potentially there they forced a reclassification of the game to AO. If your game has the potential to become AO, then the game is rated AO.

-Byshop

Avatar image for Tony_M0t0
Tony_M0t0

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 Tony_M0t0
Member since 2008 • 43 Posts
Honestly, what's wrong with sex in games??? They put coke dealing in games and I'd rather my kid be having sex than dealing coke.
Avatar image for TriangleHard
TriangleHard

9097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 62

User Lists: 0

#5 TriangleHard
Member since 2005 • 9097 Posts

Two problems:

Games are still percieved in the US and many parts of the world as being an entertainment medium made primarily for children. While it's starting to get mainstream acceptance it has a long way to go before it's held in the same regard as movies. The idea of making AO games still equates to many as nudity/sex/violence for children.

The other problem is that AO DLC isn't a workaround for the ESRB ratings. Remember that GTA : SA's sexual context was completely inaccessible from the normal game and could only be re-enabled with a hack, but when the ESRB found out the content was potentially there they forced a reclassification of the game to AO. If your game has the potential to become AO, then the game is rated AO.

-Byshop

Byshop

Don't Sims have nude character that has their private parts blurred out.

kind of like that, but sells nude patch online. That should be able to bypass ESRB since the patch is seperate content from the retail game. They can rate the patch, but not the retail game.

If the texture of private parts is not part of the retail game, and must be downloaded then I think ESRB won't be able to lable it AO, since DLC is seperate from the actual game.

I think..

As for the perception of majority of people out there, it will always be stuck as that perception unless someone takes a step forward and make a change.

Like nudity in movies and sex in movies. No one was ok with it when it first was out, but people got used to it now. You can't always be afraid of what the population thinks in this industry.

Avatar image for expandingeye
expandingeye

831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 expandingeye
Member since 2007 • 831 Posts

Well there is a nude patch but its not officially sanctioned by EA. I doubt they would even make one, since the modders do it. I think even if it doesnt equate to setting nudity/sex/violence to children the developers will still see it as unnecessary. They will just barely make games that are more extreme than a mature rating, now all developers play it stupidly safe.

Look at how manhunt 2 was destroyed because they were worried, and this is from rockstar!! If anyone you would expect rockstar to continue to make brutal games, but no they remove all of the gutting features and blur all of the kills. I never played the first one and didn't get the 2nd after hearing how they slashed out its heart.

Avatar image for byshop
Byshop

20504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#7 Byshop  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 20504 Posts

Don't Sims have nude character that has their private parts blurred out.

kind of like that, but sells nude patch online. That should be able to bypass ESRB since the patch is seperate content from the retail game. They can rate the patch, but not the retail game.

If the texture of private parts is not part of the retail game, and must be downloaded then I think ESRB won't be able to lable it AO, since DLC is seperate from the actual game.

I think..

As for the perception of majority of people out there, it will always be stuck as that perception unless someone takes a step forward and make a change.

Like nudity in movies and sex in movies. No one was ok with it when it first was out, but people got used to it now. You can't always be afraid of what the population thinks in this industry.

TriangleHard

The ESRB actually has re-rated games because of nudity patches, even non-developer created ones. The point of the rating system is so parents know exactly how bad a game -can be- for their kids when they buy it. I understand what you're suggesting, I just don't think anybody would go for it. If a game can potentially become an AO game through hacks or downloads then the practice is to rate it AO on the shelf today.

Once games reach the same level of general acceptance as movies then I think we'll see a shift in this, but electronic games have only been around 20-30 years whereas movies have been with us since the turn of the century. These things take time.

-Byshop

Avatar image for TriangleHard
TriangleHard

9097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 62

User Lists: 0

#8 TriangleHard
Member since 2005 • 9097 Posts

Well there is a nude patch but its not officially sanctioned by EA. I doubt they would even make one, since the modders do it. I think even if it doesnt equate to setting nudity/sex/violence to children the developers will still see it as unnecessary. They will just barely make games that are more extreme than a mature rating, now all developers play it stupidly safe.

Look at how manhunt 2 was destroyed because they were worried, and this is from rockstar!! If anyone you would expect rockstar to continue to make brutal games, but no they remove all of the gutting features and blur all of the kills. I never played the first one and didn't get the 2nd after hearing how they slashed out its heart.

expandingeye

Which is why DLC is perfect.

What if MGS4 releases a nude patch now? Play as Naked Snake! They already had fine success and making nude patch is nothing more than few tweaks with character model and texture. Now you can see Snake's old saggy rear end.

You can avoid all the risk, stirr up the pot for controversy.

I think Rockstar kinda did this with recent DLC for GTA IV.

Avatar image for Skylock00
Skylock00

20069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 Skylock00
Member since 2002 • 20069 Posts

[

Which is why DLC is perfect.

What if MGS4 releases a nude patch now? Play as Naked Snake! They already had fine success and making nude patch is nothing more than few tweaks with character model and texture. Now you can see Snake's old saggy rear end.

You can avoid all the risk, stirr up the pot for controversy.

I think Rockstar kinda did this with recent DLC for GTA IV.

TriangleHard

Um, no.

As repeatedly stated by Byshop, if the DLC is something that can turn the game to AO, the game as a whole becomes AO, because the rating is based on the capacity in which the content of the game can reach, even including in some cases mods, content that's normally inaccessible on the disc, and so forth.

Furthermore, if a patch can be made to 'unlock' adult content that's in the game, then the adult content has to exist in there to a point where the game would HAVE to be rated AO.

At this time, based on how the ESRB functions, you can't add DLC to make a game AO without in turn making the whole game AO as well on the retail side.

Avatar image for TriangleHard
TriangleHard

9097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 62

User Lists: 0

#10 TriangleHard
Member since 2005 • 9097 Posts

[QUOTE="TriangleHard"]

[

Which is why DLC is perfect.

What if MGS4 releases a nude patch now? Play as Naked Snake! They already had fine success and making nude patch is nothing more than few tweaks with character model and texture. Now you can see Snake's old saggy rear end.

You can avoid all the risk, stirr up the pot for controversy.

I think Rockstar kinda did this with recent DLC for GTA IV.

Skylock00

Um, no.

As repeatedly stated by Byshop, if the DLC is something that can turn the game to AO, the game as a whole becomes AO, because the rating is based on the capacity in which the content of the game can reach, even including in some cases mods, content that's normally inaccessible on the disc, and so forth.

Furthermore, if a patch can be made to 'unlock' adult content that's in the game, then the adult content has to exist in there to a point where the game would HAVE to be rated AO.

At this time, based on how the ESRB functions, you can't add DLC to make a game AO without in turn making the whole game AO as well on the retail side.

Which is why I said DLC is perfect.

Make a retail game without those textures or model. Make them as DLC.

Release the DLC when the game is no longer part of major sales, so that AO tag won't hurt the sales.

Now what you have created is extra attention for old game that people forgot about.

Avatar image for Skylock00
Skylock00

20069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 Skylock00
Member since 2002 • 20069 Posts

Which is why I said DLC is perfect.

Make a retail game without those textures or model. Make them as DLC.

Release the DLC when the game is no longer part of major sales, so that AO tag won't hurt the sales.

Now what you have created is extra attention for old game that people forgot about.

TriangleHard
Which would in turn cause a recall of current games on shelves like San Andreas, which not only hurts the retailers, but then makes them reluctant to even take in more games later on due to the risk of having to pull such a stunt.

Furthermore, an AO tag also equates the game not even being able to be stocked in most major retailers, which further makes the point one that would be meaningless to attempt, since after the recall, the games wouldn't even be restocked on the shelves in the stores.

DLC is not perfect. The only thing that would work would be for the developer to make two versions of the game, one M rated, one AO, and sell the AO one through direct online stores. The DLC route would not work, regardless of how many times you proclaim it to work.
Avatar image for CyberAltair5
CyberAltair5

1346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#12 CyberAltair5
Member since 2008 • 1346 Posts

Why should I have to pay an extra amount to see some textures slapped on polygons moving in an inappropriate way.

If your chances of getting laid are that low then you always have japanese games

Avatar image for HAVOC255
HAVOC255

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 HAVOC255
Member since 2007 • 42 Posts

i think if they did this there would be way to many perverts playing on xbox live.

Avatar image for byshop
Byshop

20504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#14 Byshop  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 20504 Posts

Even if DLC were a perfect content delivery system and you could guarantee that nobody under 18 could get their hands on it (which is pretty much impossible) there are tons of other ways that children would be able to see the missing AO content. Screenshots, Youtube, etc are all ways that children would be able to see the AO content their favorite game could provide.

Besides that, there's the question of intellectual property and branding. No game company is going to want their favorite money making mascots depicted in this way. A legitmate, mainstream patch for Tomb Raider (not some PC hack) that let you play a nude Lara would be the end of the franchise because Tomb Raider would now be associated with adult only content. The distinction of DLC would dissolve the deluge of bad press that Eidos would get.

-Byshop

Avatar image for Morphic
Morphic

4345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 Morphic
Member since 2003 • 4345 Posts

Id really enjoy more adult content for games. Nudity is fun!

Avatar image for UT_Wrestler
UT_Wrestler

16426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#16 UT_Wrestler
Member since 2004 • 16426 Posts
If you want "Adult" material, there's all kinds of things you can see on the internet for free. I no purpose in including such content in games.
Avatar image for AtomicTangerine
AtomicTangerine

4413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 AtomicTangerine
Member since 2005 • 4413 Posts

You get that before you even talk about retailers and junk, the real reason Manhunt 2 had so much trouble was Nintendo and Sony refusing to license the game. Why would they suddenly decide to start hosting content on a server that they don't want on their system?

Avatar image for Skylock00
Skylock00

20069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 Skylock00
Member since 2002 • 20069 Posts

You get that before you even talk about retailers and junk, the real reason Manhunt 2 had so much trouble was Nintendo and Sony refusing to license the game. Why would they suddenly decide to start hosting content on a server that they don't want on their system?

AtomicTangerine
Yeeeup, I even forgot that point myself. Thanks for bringing it up.
Avatar image for AtomicTangerine
AtomicTangerine

4413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 AtomicTangerine
Member since 2005 • 4413 Posts

[QUOTE="AtomicTangerine"]

You get that before you even talk about retailers and junk, the real reason Manhunt 2 had so much trouble was Nintendo and Sony refusing to license the game. Why would they suddenly decide to start hosting content on a server that they don't want on their system?

Skylock00

Yeeeup, I even forgot that point myself. Thanks for bringing it up.

Yeah, everybody acts like the ESRB is the bad guy by calling them like they see them while ignoring how console manufacturers are the ones who decide what gets on their system, not the ESRB. However, even if they did, I doubt retailers would carry the games, but at least they could exist as a legit game.