American Gamers - would you pay a minimum of $85 for a newly release game?

  • 66 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for metalloid94
metalloid94

129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1 metalloid94
Member since 2008 • 129 Posts

so american gamers would you pay a minimum of $85 for a newly released game?

Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#2 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

We already have games more expensive than that: I've seen $99 for a Collector's Edition.

To answer your question, it would depend upon what the contents were. If what is offered warrants the price, then I'll consider it.

If not, I'll buy the standard version of the game, or a Digital Download if the publisher offers it.

Avatar image for metalloid94
metalloid94

129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 metalloid94
Member since 2008 • 129 Posts

oh yeah meant to say standard edition games.

Avatar image for deactivated-5c47d700b56ab
deactivated-5c47d700b56ab

8038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 deactivated-5c47d700b56ab
Member since 2003 • 8038 Posts
why would anyone pay $85 for a newly released game?
Avatar image for metalloid94
metalloid94

129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5 metalloid94
Member since 2008 • 129 Posts

ok. in america you pay $60 for a newly released game right? in Australia we have to pay at least $100 for a newly released game, just the standard edition. converting USD to AUD means we should be paying $70, but if we want brand new game we have no other option than to pay $100 for it. is that fair?

Avatar image for DethSkematik
DethSkematik

3900

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 117

User Lists: 0

#6 DethSkematik
Member since 2008 • 3900 Posts

ok. in america you pay $60 for a newly released game right? in Australia we have to pay at least $100 for a newly released game, just the standard edition. converting USD to AUD means we should be paying $70, but if we want brand new game we have no other option than to pay $100 for it. is that fair?

metalloid94
Damn, that's rough dude. Honestly, I'd be pretty sick to shell out that much for a standard game. Personally, that would encourage me to buy used or wait for the game to get old enough to be at a reasonable price. What are they doing with the extra $30? Is that an import tax or something?
Avatar image for immortality20
immortality20

8546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

#7 immortality20
Member since 2005 • 8546 Posts

In Canada we pay 69.99 for most games.

Avatar image for Ca_shadow
Ca_shadow

201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Ca_shadow
Member since 2004 • 201 Posts
I would either find illegal means of aquiring the game, or just buy used games. I could see that happening though with all the greed today.
Avatar image for bigboss1203
bigboss1203

1885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#9 bigboss1203
Member since 2009 • 1885 Posts

85 bucks?? i dont pay the normal 60 bucks. i always get my games at Gamers cause they go by how popular a game is. i always get my ps3 games for 45 bucks or cheaper if i wait i week or so after a game comes out. and if i dont wanna even pay that, there is always gamefly. Unless its a game that i cannot wait to bring home immidietly and play like Modern warfare 2 and Heavy Rain.

Avatar image for Treflis
Treflis

13757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Treflis
Member since 2004 • 13757 Posts
In Norway a newly released game costs about 100$ ( additional dollars for special editions), so if it was the price for a newly released game then I'd welcome it.
Avatar image for SavageM2
SavageM2

10800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 SavageM2
Member since 2005 • 10800 Posts

I don't pay $60, no way in hell I am paying $85. I wait for the game to drop in price once or twice before I even consider buying it. If they get bumped up to $85 I will just wait longer. :)

Avatar image for King9999
King9999

11837

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#12 King9999
Member since 2002 • 11837 Posts

I don't know. If $85 became standard, it would make digital downloads look more attractive.

Avatar image for raahsnavj
raahsnavj

4895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#13 raahsnavj
Member since 2005 • 4895 Posts
The only thing I can think to say about this is life isn't fair. And I'm sure if you wait for price drops then it wouldn't be much of a problem...
Avatar image for jjtiebuckle
jjtiebuckle

1856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#14 jjtiebuckle
Member since 2008 • 1856 Posts

I don't know. If $85 became standard, it would make digital downloads look more attractive.

King9999
Steam proved that even digital downloads would remaind the same price as their hard copy bretheren. You know when the industry is going downhill when DS or PSP games become 60$ and consoles 85$+. My answer is no..same goes for my kids.
Avatar image for Kage1
Kage1

6806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Kage1
Member since 2003 • 6806 Posts

No I wouldnt pay 85 bucks for a game. I did in the past. I payed almost that amount for the import version of Tekken 3 and MK3 on the Snes.

Avatar image for Grieverr
Grieverr

2835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Grieverr
Member since 2002 • 2835 Posts

I don't think I'd be inclined to buy an $85 (USD) game. If I did, I'd buy two or three games a year, as opposed to the 6 or 8 I do now.

Truth be told, you can have a lot of the same gaming expereinces that you have now with older games. Taking this generation as an example, instead of buying an $85 Xbox 360 game, I'd buy two $20 PS2 games and pocket the rest. The games are just as good, except for the graphics, of course.

Avatar image for Jackc8
Jackc8

8515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#17 Jackc8
Member since 2007 • 8515 Posts

No way would I pay $85. I only pay $60 if it's a big AAA title that I've really been looking forward to. All the rest I wait for the price to come down, hunt for bargains, or buy it used.

Avatar image for quijeros
quijeros

1728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 quijeros
Member since 2008 • 1728 Posts

Not a chance would I pay that much for any new game, but I wouldn't be surprised to see it happening sometime in the future.

Avatar image for -DirtySanchez-
-DirtySanchez-

32760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 -DirtySanchez-
Member since 2003 • 32760 Posts
no i would never buy a game if they go that high
Avatar image for Kenbo325
Kenbo325

1177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 Kenbo325
Member since 2009 • 1177 Posts

Call me cheap, but i usually only buy games once their price has fallen below $29.99 :)

Avatar image for Twig978
Twig978

557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Twig978
Member since 2009 • 557 Posts
No, I would sell my consoles if prices were so ridiculous. If you add tax in some places it's over $90! I'm not paying such a price for a game.
Avatar image for soulfinger
soulfinger

690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 soulfinger
Member since 2003 • 690 Posts

It's just as bad in the UK. Avareage price for brand new console game is £39.99 (though you can get them a few pounds cheaper depending on the retailer/online) so that's currently about $65 but when the pound was stronger a year ago, games were costing $70 - $80. With new game like Ghosbusters and Modern Warfare 2 having even higher RRP we will continue to get stiffed in Europe.

Avatar image for ricosuave84
ricosuave84

290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 ricosuave84
Member since 2009 • 290 Posts

that depends on if your talking about a normal game or a collectors edition of a game. if its a collectors edition of a game that im a huge fan of then i have no problem dropping even more than $85. but if your saying its just a run of the mill game no way. the day gamestop starts charging $85 for all new releases is the day i stop buying games honestly.

Avatar image for McMJ3
McMJ3

2441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

#24 McMJ3
Member since 2008 • 2441 Posts

In Canada we pay 69.99 for most games.

immortality20

Yep, and that comes to about 80$ with taxes, and I payed that much for a game once. I loved the game but I still felt like I was wasting my money.

Avatar image for masterpinky2000
masterpinky2000

1955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 95

User Lists: 0

#25 masterpinky2000
Member since 2004 • 1955 Posts

Yes -- in limited cases. When a game is really good and is going to give you, say, 16 hours of entertainment, then I think it is worth $80+. I mean, a $10 movie ticket is good for two hours of entertainment. Multiply it out for a game of 15-16 hours, and that's $80. That doesn't include potential replays or multiplayer or other things like that.

Games are actually quite a cheap form of entertainment when viewed this way. The guy who has put 100+ hours into Halo 3 (or Call of Duty 4) in multiplayer is paying very little per hour of entertainment, even accounting for the cost of the console and Live.

Avatar image for Gammit10
Gammit10

2397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 119

User Lists: 2

#26 Gammit10
Member since 2004 • 2397 Posts
no
Avatar image for bluezy
bluezy

29297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#27 bluezy
Member since 2004 • 29297 Posts
Not a chance. I rarely pay $60-$70 for games as it is.
Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#28 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

so american gamers would you pay a minimum of $85 for a newly released game?

metalloid94

No never. Not for a standard edition game.

Avatar image for DarkGamer007
DarkGamer007

6033

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 DarkGamer007
Member since 2008 • 6033 Posts

No :| Games are already $10 too expensive, and considering the mass amounts of DLC that gets released for each game, $85 is way to much.

Avatar image for obscured_echo
obscured_echo

60

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 obscured_echo
Member since 2009 • 60 Posts

If games ever started costing that much, I'll be the biggest retro gamer you've ever seen.

Avatar image for AtomicTangerine
AtomicTangerine

4413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 AtomicTangerine
Member since 2005 • 4413 Posts

If games ever started costing that much, I'll be the biggest retro gamer you've ever seen.

obscured_echo

Which is ironic considering that many of my old games cost more BEFORE you take inflation into account. Of course, they are real cheap now, but some people here forget that video games are way more affordable now than what they used to be.

Avatar image for ASK_Story
ASK_Story

11455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 ASK_Story
Member since 2006 • 11455 Posts
$60 is expensive enough. I feel for anyone else who has to pay more than that.
Avatar image for allicrombie
Allicrombie

26223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#33 Allicrombie
Member since 2005 • 26223 Posts
59.99 is rather cheap now, I remember when we were plopping down 84.99 for every SNES RPG that came out (I didnt get all of em, just the good ones, Mana, Trigger, etc)
Avatar image for Mash_Affect
Mash_Affect

631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Mash_Affect
Member since 2008 • 631 Posts

Why non-Americans insist onconverting their prices into USD is something I'll never understand. Regardless of what the cost comes out to in USD, you're making about the same investment in games that an American is.Foryour information, noone in their right mind would spend the equivalent of $100 on a video game. Eventhe richwould look at that as an obscene waste of money. Just to give you an idea on how screwed up using a currency conversion as a direct comparison is.

Avatar image for SpaceMoose
SpaceMoose

10789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 SpaceMoose
Member since 2004 • 10789 Posts
Generally, no, since I don't even pay $50 or $60 for most games. I usually wait until the price drops. If it was Diablo III or something, I just might, if that was the actual normal price of it in the United States, which it obviously won't be. (Of course, I'm probably going to get the collector's edition of that game, so maybe it will.) :P
Avatar image for SpaceMoose
SpaceMoose

10789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 SpaceMoose
Member since 2004 • 10789 Posts
59.99 is rather cheap now, I remember when we were plopping down 84.99 for every SNES RPG that came out (I didnt get all of em, just the good ones, Mana, Trigger, etc)Allicrombie
Yeah, I know. I was thinking about that too. Cartridge space was expensive back then though. That was usually the excuse they gave. Why was Final Fantasy III (now known as VI) an $80 game? Because it was the largest SNES game up to that point. Optical discs cost next to nothing to make in bulk. On the other hand, these days development costs are generally much higher for big name games.
Avatar image for NightlyOne
NightlyOne

331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 NightlyOne
Member since 2009 • 331 Posts

$85? Absolutely not. The most I'll ever pay for a new game is $50. Even then, it has to be a REALLY promising game for me to shell the 50.

If game prices ever rose that high, I'll probably just stick to renting games instead of buying them.

Avatar image for LordGamer0001
LordGamer0001

8752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

#38 LordGamer0001
Member since 2004 • 8752 Posts

i cant justify spending $60 on a new game. spending $85 would probably push me away from gaming. unless there are places to get them used. then maybe.

Avatar image for ASK_Story
ASK_Story

11455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 ASK_Story
Member since 2006 • 11455 Posts

59.99 is rather cheap now, I remember when we were plopping down 84.99 for every SNES RPG that came out (I didnt get all of em, just the good ones, Mana, Trigger, etc)Allicrombie

Well, for me back then, my parents did all the purchasing so I had no concept or idea of what spending money on games was like. They bought, I received. Simple as that.To tell you the truth, I don't even remember how much Chrono Trigger or Final Fantasy III (SNES) was.

But now, I'm buying everything. So in that sense, $60 feels like a lot, after spending $30-50 max during PS1/PS2 era.

Avatar image for SpaceMoose
SpaceMoose

10789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 SpaceMoose
Member since 2004 • 10789 Posts

Well, I just learned something new after some searching, and that is that the minimum wage in Australia is $13.50 ($12.30 USD) / per hour, while the minimum wage in the United States is $7.25 USD per hour, so I'm sure that has a bit do with it.

Interestingly, $12.30 / $7.25 = ~1.70

$100 / $60 = ~1.67

So, if a game is $100 in Australia and $60 in the United States, from the perspective of people working minimum wage jobs in each country, in Australia it is actually slightly cheaper. If it's $85, then they're getting an even better deal. Granted, that does not factor in things like basic cost of living and taxes and other such complicating factors.

It also kind of begs the question of whether or not minimum wage actually accomplishes anything, but that's a whole other discussion. (I've actually made at least one thread about that before.)

Avatar image for metalloid94
metalloid94

129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#41 metalloid94
Member since 2008 • 129 Posts

im a teenager though, without a part time job, thats mostly why i am so reluctunant to spend so much money on a game that i could get cheaper in a different country

Avatar image for deactivated-6016f2513d412
deactivated-6016f2513d412

20414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 deactivated-6016f2513d412
Member since 2007 • 20414 Posts
...No. I have a hard time paying $60 right now.
Avatar image for soulless4now
soulless4now

41388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#43 soulless4now
Member since 2003 • 41388 Posts

Heck no. I'll wait until it drops down in price,even if it takes a few years.

Avatar image for SpaceMoose
SpaceMoose

10789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 SpaceMoose
Member since 2004 • 10789 Posts

im a teenager though, without a part time job, thats mostly why i am so reluctunant to spend so much money on a game that i could get cheaper in a different country

metalloid94
But if you lived in a different country, what makes you think you would get whatever amount of money you currently do?
Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts

Well, I wouldn't protest it. Developers really should be charging more for games with the skyrocketting development costs.

Buuuuuut I'd probably just buy things on Ebay.

Avatar image for jamesden1
jamesden1

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 jamesden1
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
I never spend that much for new game releases ..I will spend 40 to 50 $ not more then that even if it good ..
Avatar image for King9999
King9999

11837

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#47 King9999
Member since 2002 • 11837 Posts

Yes -- in limited cases. When a game is really good and is going to give you, say, 16 hours of entertainment, then I think it is worth $80+. I mean, a $10 movie ticket is good for two hours of entertainment. Multiply it out for a game of 15-16 hours, and that's $80. That doesn't include potential replays or multiplayer or other things like that.

Games are actually quite a cheap form of entertainment when viewed this way. The guy who has put 100+ hours into Halo 3 (or Call of Duty 4) in multiplayer is paying very little per hour of entertainment, even accounting for the cost of the console and Live.

masterpinky2000

You know the prices are too high when you have to make this sort of calculation.

Avatar image for Mash_Affect
Mash_Affect

631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Mash_Affect
Member since 2008 • 631 Posts

Well, I wouldn't protest it. Developers really should be charging more for games with the skyrocketting development costs.

Buuuuuut I'd probably just buy things on Ebay.

hakanakumono

A game that costs less than 20 million to make costs the consumer $60 (plus the nickel and diming of DLC), but a movie that costs 100-200 million to make costs the consumer less than $30 to not only see it at the the theater, but also buy the DVD.

We're getting ripped.

That's why most people are turning to used games or waiting for price drops. If the gaming industry attempts to raise prices even slightly higher, then the first wave of games that abide will fail during their crucial first few release months, and the industry will get a harsh reality check.

We'll see what happens as the industry continues to push the limits and sees how muchit can get away with.

Avatar image for SuperSamyon
SuperSamyon

2185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 SuperSamyon
Member since 2002 • 2185 Posts

Call me cheap, but i usually only buy games once their price has fallen below $29.99 :)

Kenbo325

Thats not cheap thats being smart with your money.

I won't pay more than $49.99 for any game. and even that is pushing it The only exception was Street Fighter 4's Collectors Edition which I had my family buy (or at least pay some of it). So $85 bucks for a standard game is completely out of the question especially since I usually play my games for about 3 hours then lose interest because of life/work/relationships/time.

Now when I was younger I could justify that expense more because I didn't have as many bills or responsibilites. As an adult, however, I cannot justify that expense especially since gaming has taken a backseat to other priorities. For me, $85 bucks could be spent paying off bills or taking a date out on a nice night on the town.

Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#50 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

ok. in america you pay $60 for a newly released game right? in Australia we have to pay at least $100 for a newly released game, just the standard edition. converting USD to AUD means we should be paying $70, but if we want brand new game we have no other option than to pay $100 for it. is that fair?

metalloid94

The seller always charges what the market will bear. For example, fuel for your vehicle would be a lot cheaper if we could keep the speculators out: most of the ones buying it have nothing to do with the refining of oil. Yet governments aren't locking up the stock exchange rules, so we have to pay at the pump.