Character-wise, who is the best: Altair, Ezio, Connor?

Altair is a badass stoic character 

Auditore was a badass ladies man character.

Connor was just sh!t. Nothing really to him. Not his fault, series stagnated after Brotherhood.

I think Ezio is the best character in the series by far, but I like Altair as a legendary figure for the later games, and it makes replaying the first game that much better. Not a fan of Conner at all.

Ezio. It's not even close.

Connor is my favorite. He seems to fight not just for the Brotherhood, but his own reasons as well.

Altair :3 
just because it means the flyer  

I prefer Altair, hands down.

I'ma have to go with Altair. Ezio is close. But, naturally, I see him more as a premature, idolized version of Altair. Connor... Well, he's just kinda there.

You actually see Ezio grow from an immature womanizer into a master assassin training other assassins. The character development of Ezio is miles ahead of Altair's and Connor. Also, Atair didn't even really have a personality in AC. But still, I'd put him in second because Connor is a such a twerp.

You actually see Ezio grow from an immature womanizer into a master assassin training other assassins. The character development of Ezio is miles ahead of Altair's and Connor. Also, Atair didn't even really have a personality in AC. But still, I'd put him in second because Connor is a such a twerp.

Ish_basic

Ezio, but that's because he had triple the game exposure than the other two.

Altair :3 
just because it means the flyer  

gameme199

Altair is Arabic for bird, not 'the flyer'. It's also the name of the of the brightest star in the Aquila constellation (Aquilla meaning Eagle)

Ezio. Altair waspure cardboard in the first game and Connor came off as way too narrowminded.

Kratos lol.

Ezio and it isn't even a competition. 

Ezio, his development as a charecter was brilliant!

Then Altair, persoanlly I like Altair better; however in the games he really came off flat. But the lore, and journal entries along with the pockets of prsoanlity in AC1 really shows a great charecter.

Conner, I dont hate him like you all seem to; but I never really resonated and iirc (been a while since AC3) he was really simple minded; he was educated and had this rich heritage but yet was soley after his revenge and never really looked at the grander picture. I find it interesting, because his brashness is very much agasint the kind of people that Ezio and Altair eventually became. He had his moments, like his brutal truth and honesty when it came to alot of the more questionable things about the revolution.

I really think the mistake they made was they never showed him growing in the sense seeing the big picture, being more reserved. Compare him to Ezio, Ezio was dealt a tragedy, yet he was not as brash. Its an interesting difference. I honestly do not know what to think of Conner, I like him yet I feel like he could have been much more, brashness and all.

Ezio by a landslide, followed by Connor and Altair. I hated the first AC.

Ezio by a landslide, followed by Connor and Altair. I hated the first AC.

immortality20

I hated the first AC.

immortality20

Ezio by a landslide, followed by Connor and Altair. I hated the first AC.

immortality20

The first game is a classic, great game. 

AC 2 is better though.