Poll COD Advanced Warfare, good or recycled trash? (36 votes)
Just saw the teaser trailer for COD Advanced Warfare, it looks decent I guess, what are your thoughts?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Just saw the teaser trailer for COD Advanced Warfare, it looks decent I guess, what are your thoughts?
The game's not released yet. But, if I had to take a guess, I'd say that the changes to the technology are superficial at best and won't really effect the gameplay in too significant a way. Could be wrong, though.
It's a copy paste with Titanfall rip off features
Yeah seems like it.
If the SP campaign is decent, I might give it a go. Otherwise, I'll pass on it like the last few games.
Instead of jumping on the hate train I'll reserve my judgement until I see more game play and hear more info.
It's a copy paste with Titanfall rip off features
Yeah seems like it.
If the SP campaign is decent, I might give it a go. Otherwise, I'll pass on it like the last few games.
It is easy to say that it is ripping of Titanfall because it is the most recent FPS with a futuristic setting, bu AW is taking more from Crysis. Anyway, like many have already said, it will still sell millions. Be that as it may, I actually doubt that this will be recycled, at least when it comes to SP. Some fresh details mentioned upgrading your suit with points from each mission. That by itself suggest more tactical freedom and open areas in the campaign.
Because we can totally tell how a game is going to turn out from an announcement trailer. It might be the same, it might not. At least its not being developed by zombie Infinityward
It's a copy paste with Titanfall rip off features
Yeah seems like it.
If the SP campaign is decent, I might give it a go. Otherwise, I'll pass on it like the last few games.
i haven't given Activision money since BLOPS 1
It's a copy paste with Titanfall rip off features
Yeah seems like it.
If the SP campaign is decent, I might give it a go. Otherwise, I'll pass on it like the last few games.
It is easy to say that it is ripping of Titanfall because it is the most recent FPS with a futuristic setting, bu AW is taking more from Crysis. Anyway, like many have already said, it will still sell millions. Be that as it may, I actually doubt that this will be recycled, at least when it comes to SP. Some fresh details mentioned upgrading your suit with points from each mission. That by itself suggest more tactical freedom and open areas in the campaign.
Then why are there mechs and big jumps suddenly in? They are trying to stay relevant
It's a copy paste with Titanfall rip off features
Yeah seems like it.
If the SP campaign is decent, I might give it a go. Otherwise, I'll pass on it like the last few games.
It is easy to say that it is ripping of Titanfall because it is the most recent FPS with a futuristic setting, bu AW is taking more from Crysis. Anyway, like many have already said, it will still sell millions. Be that as it may, I actually doubt that this will be recycled, at least when it comes to SP. Some fresh details mentioned upgrading your suit with points from each mission. That by itself suggest more tactical freedom and open areas in the campaign.
Then why are there mechs and big jumps suddenly in? They are trying to stay relevant
The closest thing we saw to a mech was that guy in a big exo suit. They said that they have been developing it for 3 years, but we all know that even if it is true people will not believe it. But whatever the case, the fact is that it will not play like Titanfall.
It's a copy paste with Titanfall rip off features
Yeah seems like it.
If the SP campaign is decent, I might give it a go. Otherwise, I'll pass on it like the last few games.
It is easy to say that it is ripping of Titanfall because it is the most recent FPS with a futuristic setting, bu AW is taking more from Crysis. Anyway, like many have already said, it will still sell millions. Be that as it may, I actually doubt that this will be recycled, at least when it comes to SP. Some fresh details mentioned upgrading your suit with points from each mission. That by itself suggest more tactical freedom and open areas in the campaign.
Then why are there mechs and big jumps suddenly in? They are trying to stay relevant
The closest thing we saw to a mech was that guy in a big exo suit. They said that they have been developing it for 3 years, but we all know that even if it is true people will not believe it. But whatever the case, the fact is that it will not play like Titanfall.
That's bs, Sledghammer helped out on MW3, so two years tops...
It's definitely going to be interesting whether it's good or not. I'm gonna reserve judgement until it comes out.
It's a copy paste with Titanfall rip off features
Yeah seems like it.
If the SP campaign is decent, I might give it a go. Otherwise, I'll pass on it like the last few games.
It is easy to say that it is ripping of Titanfall because it is the most recent FPS with a futuristic setting, bu AW is taking more from Crysis. Anyway, like many have already said, it will still sell millions. Be that as it may, I actually doubt that this will be recycled, at least when it comes to SP. Some fresh details mentioned upgrading your suit with points from each mission. That by itself suggest more tactical freedom and open areas in the campaign.
Then why are there mechs and big jumps suddenly in? They are trying to stay relevant
The closest thing we saw to a mech was that guy in a big exo suit. They said that they have been developing it for 3 years, but we all know that even if it is true people will not believe it. But whatever the case, the fact is that it will not play like Titanfall.
That's bs, Sledghammer helped out on MW3, so two years tops...
That doesn't mean that they also couldn't have been working on this game as well.
@Archangel3371: Still doesn't mean it's going to be good...
I never said that that means it'll be good I just said that just because they helped with MW3 that doesn't mean that they couldn't have also been working on Advanced Warfare as well.
@Archangel3371: Still doesn't mean it's going to be good...
I never said that that means it'll be good I just said that just because they helped with MW3 that doesn't mean that they couldn't have also been working on Advanced Warfare as well.
They didn't have the full team for 3 years
@Archangel3371: Still doesn't mean it's going to be good...
I never said that that means it'll be good I just said that just because they helped with MW3 that doesn't mean that they couldn't have also been working on Advanced Warfare as well.
They didn't have the full team for 3 years
Yeah so? People still could have done other things or whatever or maybe those that were helping could have also been doing some stuff on Advanced Warfare as well. Helping another team with a game doesn't automatically preclude them from doing anything else.
I'm excited for it. I don't understand why people think having the same mechanics is a bad thing. When something is fun, it should stay fun. I mean what do you want them to do, guns are guns and soldiers are soldiers. Do you want them to turn it into a cartoon with lasers or something? A shooter is a shooter. New maps, tweaked gameplay and a fun story are all they need every year to have me salivating for more.
I'm excited for it. I don't understand why people think having the same mechanics is a bad thing. When something is fun, it should stay fun. I mean what do you want them to do, guns are guns and soldiers are soldiers. Do you want them to turn it into a cartoon with lasers or something? A shooter is a shooter. New maps, tweaked gameplay and a fun story are all they need every year to have me salivating for more.
Because why would you pay $60 for a game that makes such small changes that it could easily pass as DLC? Seriously, each game is just new maps and some new guns. That is DLC material, not sequel material.
Recycled shit.Hasn't it always been like that?
Have voted for recycled shit but we gotta wait....
I'm excited for it. I don't understand why people think having the same mechanics is a bad thing. When something is fun, it should stay fun. I mean what do you want them to do, guns are guns and soldiers are soldiers. Do you want them to turn it into a cartoon with lasers or something? A shooter is a shooter. New maps, tweaked gameplay and a fun story are all they need every year to have me salivating for more.
Because why would you pay $60 for a game that makes such small changes that it could easily pass as DLC? Seriously, each game is just new maps and some new guns. That is DLC material, not sequel material.
THIS !
I'm excited for it. I don't understand why people think having the same mechanics is a bad thing. When something is fun, it should stay fun. I mean what do you want them to do, guns are guns and soldiers are soldiers. Do you want them to turn it into a cartoon with lasers or something? A shooter is a shooter. New maps, tweaked gameplay and a fun story are all they need every year to have me salivating for more.
Because why would you pay $60 for a game that makes such small changes that it could easily pass as DLC? Seriously, each game is just new maps and some new guns. That is DLC material, not sequel material.
There's also a new campaign with new story, dialog, characters, environments. New content beyond just maps for other modes as well such as Zombies and Extinction. Sometimes there's even new modes as well such as Safeguard and Squads in Ghosts. Saying each new game is just new maps and guns is just not true and each game is just as much sequel material as most every other game out there.
I'm excited for it. I don't understand why people think having the same mechanics is a bad thing. When something is fun, it should stay fun. I mean what do you want them to do, guns are guns and soldiers are soldiers. Do you want them to turn it into a cartoon with lasers or something? A shooter is a shooter. New maps, tweaked gameplay and a fun story are all they need every year to have me salivating for more.
Because why would you pay $60 for a game that makes such small changes that it could easily pass as DLC? Seriously, each game is just new maps and some new guns. That is DLC material, not sequel material.
There's also a new campaign with new story, dialog, characters, environments. New content beyond just maps for other modes as well such as Zombies and Extinction. Sometimes there's even new modes as well such as Safeguard and Squads in Ghosts. Saying each new game is just new maps and guns is just not true and each game is just as much sequel material as most every other game out there.
A new campaign? The Modern Warfare trilogy is painful. The same game three times.
Ghosts was awful. Rorke is such a boring antagonist, that I can't even call him a bad one. He is just so generic and bland and just a BORE.
I actually like the Treyarch COD games. They are quite good. They keep doing interesting things with their titles. They are the ones who are actually trying to put some effort into the series.
Ill wait to cast my vote on the game till i see actual footage not videos and such. Last time i was fed into the hype COD i bought Ghosts and that was mistake ill not make again. Sledgehammer made MW3 and while i was not impressed at all with that game, the SP was good. I said before that i wouldnt buy another COD, i may break that again but wont buy any season passes and such.
@Kevlar101: Well you may not like it but it's still new content and is certainly more then merely new maps and some new guns.
I'm excited for it. I don't understand why people think having the same mechanics is a bad thing. When something is fun, it should stay fun. I mean what do you want them to do, guns are guns and soldiers are soldiers. Do you want them to turn it into a cartoon with lasers or something? A shooter is a shooter. New maps, tweaked gameplay and a fun story are all they need every year to have me salivating for more.
Because why would you pay $60 for a game that makes such small changes that it could easily pass as DLC? Seriously, each game is just new maps and some new guns. That is DLC material, not sequel material.
Because it's worth every freaking penny, every freaking year. If it weren't it wouldn't be the #1 selling game for about the last 10 years.
I'm excited for it. I don't understand why people think having the same mechanics is a bad thing. When something is fun, it should stay fun. I mean what do you want them to do, guns are guns and soldiers are soldiers. Do you want them to turn it into a cartoon with lasers or something? A shooter is a shooter. New maps, tweaked gameplay and a fun story are all they need every year to have me salivating for more.
Because why would you pay $60 for a game that makes such small changes that it could easily pass as DLC? Seriously, each game is just new maps and some new guns. That is DLC material, not sequel material.
Because it's worth every freaking penny, every freaking year. If it weren't it wouldn't be the #1 selling game for about the last 10 years.
Wow, you got defensive pretty fast.... O...O
Trailer seemed cool although I guess that's the point of trailers. I still want to eventually buy a CoD; I'll probably pick up world at war later this year.
I immediately thought of titanfall when i saw it. This is their answer to it. Variety is good for us the consumers.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment