EA says they hate console wars, says they want one universal system

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ASK_Story
ASK_Story

11455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 ASK_Story
Member since 2006 • 11455 Posts

http://gamepro.com/news.cfm?article_id=141948&lid=VideoGameNews&pos=3

"We want an open, standard platform which is much easier than having five which are not compatible," EA's Gerhard Florin told BBC News in an article published on Friday. "We definitely don't want to have [one monopolized] platform."

Florin believes that a single console would make life easier for both publishers and consumers so long as current hardware makers have the opportunity to stream exclusive content to designated channels.

"You don't need an Xbox 360, PS3 or Wii - the consumer won't even realize the platform it is being played on," he said.

Games analyst Nick Parker agrees with the single set-top, internet-enabled box. "There could be a Nintendo channel, a PlayStation channel and an Xbox channel on your set-top box," he predicted. "There might not be a need for a PS4 or dedicated consoles."

Just how long before competing consoles take the big dirt nap then? "I am not sure," the senior EA executive replied. "We could be talking up to 15 years."

Interesting. EA, the king of multi-platforming and milking wants one console. Hmmm...I thought they loved console wars. :|

Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts
Of course they do, they're a third-party! What third-party enjoys making 3 seperate versions of their games? Many have speculate that game consoles are headed towards commoditization and a universal standard. But the problem is...you lose the rapid progression of hardware and 1st-party software when that's the case.
Avatar image for Gunraidan
Gunraidan

4272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Gunraidan
Member since 2007 • 4272 Posts

I know this is going to piss people off by saying this but..... I think that would be horrible for the industry.

Why?

Easy there will be very little competition and evolution in the industry.

If we only had a unified console there would be no Xbox Live, there would be no Wii, there would be no tech. mixing or 1080p.

Multiple consoles all competing at once create competion. If a console has something intersting on it then it would force another console maker to tighten up their resources to also have it or make better what they have of it (example PSN is now taking on XBL). If another console is losing it starts to get desperate that they are forced to change their business models and it results in either failure (SEGA Dreamcast) or successs (Nintendo Wii). Not only that but because of this we get MORE games made both 1st (Uncharted) and 3rd (Dead Rising) party because console companys are force to compete with one anothers library.

You want to see what a unified platform would be like? Well I have an idea.

For 8 years we were forced to play games on this giant monochrome beast with the best improvement of it being re-releases of it making it smaller. Now what did we get 8 years later? Literally the same exact thing with almost the same exact ram and horse power only with a little better then NES color....that's it. Then the GBA came buy, that's right it took 11 years before we got a TRUE succesor to the thing. However all Nintendo mostly did was just port their old SNES games or even NES to the system.

Now as we know we constantly hear people call the Nintendo DS the greatest handheld or even system of all-time. Why? Simple because it had competition. The PSP is the ONLY handheld to EVER break into Nintendo's Iron Fisted market. Even though the gap in sales is big, the system forces Nintendo on their toes as they constantly make fresh additions to their franchises, push the systems power, making deals with third parties, and most of all creating new IP's. I find it obvious for myself that Nintendo's plan for the DS was originally just to treat it like the GBA, just port all their old games on it and let the third parties throw whatever they desire. I mean for launch window they only had a port of Mario 64, a demo of Metroid (gimmicky at that), Yoshi's Touch and Go, and Poke'mon Dash. It wasn't until the PSP started giving the handheld some competition that Nintendo was forced to get off their butt, and the result is what you see today.

Well anyway that's how I see this. However I must admit what EA just said IS inevitable.

Avatar image for EazyB
EazyB

7944

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 EazyB
Member since 2003 • 7944 Posts

I think a single consol would defiantly not be benificial for the industry and gamers.

EA's Bioware making a Halo game really makes me feel like MS and EA are coming together. I know it's a stretch and highly unlikely, but with each passing day I see EA and MS gettin real close.

Avatar image for PinkPixels
PinkPixels

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 PinkPixels
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
EA hates competition. They had to BUY an exclusive license for the NFL to stop Sega from humiliating their Madden franchise. As long as they can buy monopolies they will be happy.
Avatar image for Oilers99
Oilers99

28844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#6 Oilers99
Member since 2002 • 28844 Posts
A standardized platform works for movies. It's very linear, very easy to understand how it needs to improve. The whole point is to display the image as clearly as possible, and leave some space on the disk for extras whenever possible. That's it. No real needs to read into it beyond that. It's not so simple with gaming. The thing is... how you interactive with your games is almost as important as the game themselves. Controller design affects gameplay, hardware design affects gameplay... and these improvements are not always linear. Nintendo's motion-control was a step way off to the side, but it was nice diversification for the industry, and never would have happened if Nintendo didn't need something different to claw back into the fight with Sony and Microsoft.

Maybe a standard platform will be good for the industry one day. But until it becomes clear that there's very little new territory to cover in hardware design, I think we could use the competition.
Avatar image for selbie
selbie

13295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#7 selbie
Member since 2004 • 13295 Posts
Since when does EA run the show :roll: They should start making quality games before opening their fat mouths.
Avatar image for DarkCatalyst
DarkCatalyst

21074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 DarkCatalyst
Member since 2002 • 21074 Posts
Bring it on. Let's end the big irrelevant pissing contest once and for all.
Avatar image for cos_vanquish
cos_vanquish

1143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#9 cos_vanquish
Member since 2007 • 1143 Posts
I think one console would be beneficial to the consumer and would work out really well for our pockets. Though, I'm scared to see what the end result is and how nice it will stay as for future proof. I'm a bit skeptical on that part, unless it is fully upgradeable. The person who seems to get hurt in all this is the publishers that have usually always made games for multiplatforms to expand their return revenue. But, as for the creators, the way I read the article, it seemed that the 3 companies will all benefit from it, possibly not as much as they were seeing at a stand alone company. But, with 3 different companies working on one soul project together, I would be amazed at what they would come up with, it almost seems like it would be the console to end all consoles.
Avatar image for RK-Mara
RK-Mara

11489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#10 RK-Mara
Member since 2006 • 11489 Posts
One universal system would be the best for third party developers and consumers.
Avatar image for CarnageHeart
CarnageHeart

18316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 CarnageHeart
Member since 2002 • 18316 Posts

:roll: EA was a big backer of the 3DO. Clearly the dream didn't die.

Happily for those of us who enjoy innovation, I doubt a one size fits all console will ever come to pass. As I said in another post in a similar thread, the really interesting hardware improvements over the years has gone against what was then the common consensus (be it the focus on 3D, the incorporation of hard drives or the building in a modem with every system).