Epic: PS4 is like a really perfect gaming PC.

  • 70 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for S0lidSnake
S0lidSnake

29001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#1 S0lidSnake
Member since 2002 • 29001 Posts

More devs singing PS4's praises. Epic's Mark Rein joins in on the fun:

An Epic Games exec has compared the PlayStation 4 to "a really perfect gaming PC," citing the console's combination of "phenomenal" hardware and convenient user experience.

Speaking to CVG in a recent interview, VP Mark Rein called Sony's decision to incorporate off-the-shelf PC components in PS4 "very smart," because in his opinion it will allow many developers to hit the ground running with their next-gen game development.

He also pointed to the memory limitations of the 32-bit versions of Windows as an example of how PS4 titles could even surpass what "most PCs" can do.

"I think it's a very smart move on Sony's behalf to build this sort of enhanced PC architecture and then put so much in it," he said.

"Let's not forget it has 16 times the memory we had in PlayStation 3 - that's not insignificant. Knowing that every machine has that... we can do crazy, ridiculous stuff with that."The other exciting thing is that... when you think about Windows, even Windows for most people is tied to about 2GB of addressable memory space. This really opens up beyond what most PCs can do, because most PCs are running a 32-bit version of Windows.

"It's like giving you the world's best PC,
" he added, pointing to Sony's introduction of "super convenient" features such as the ability to play games while they're downloading and perform background updates.

"The kind of stuff that they announced that they're doing, the level of convenience and things like that... they're making a really perfect gaming PC," he added.

"I've always said that the things in the next-generation that aren't just brute force hardware are all about the service and simplicity of the experience - the things that make it as fun and easy to get a PS4 game as it is to get a game on your iPad."

Commenting on Microsoft's next-gen console plans, Rein said he was confident the Xbox firm will also be doing something 'along the lines' of PS4.

Source Mark Rein

I would've liked a better GPU... 1.8Tflops is kinda lame seeing as how my 2010 GPU GTX570 is 1.45 Tflops... BUT looks like Sony's made a lot of very smart choices with the architecture. Unified RAM, compute units on the GPU doing traditional CPU work, shared CPU and GPU access to RAM. It could really produce some amazing visuals in the next couple of years. 

After Deep Down was confirmed to be realtime and running on the PS4, i cant wait to see what Naughty Dog can accomplish on the PS4.

Avatar image for Cyberdot
Cyberdot

3928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Cyberdot
Member since 2013 • 3928 Posts

Wow. A human-being actually said something incredibly stupid.

Just wow.

Avatar image for GodModeEnabled
GodModeEnabled

15314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#3 GodModeEnabled
Member since 2005 • 15314 Posts
More like a low end PC. This Epic guy is such a fvcking idiot that words fail to do his ignorance justice.
Avatar image for Shame-usBlackley
Shame-usBlackley

18266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#4 Shame-usBlackley
Member since 2002 • 18266 Posts

I think when you take his entire conversation into account, and not just the "perfect gaming PC line" he makes a lot of logical points. The PS4 is not going to have to run a bloated OS. The PS4 is going to have a very large amount of RAM. The PS4 is going to be easy to develop on, and is designed around more than just specs. 

How is this even controversial? I mean, most people have already stated this as pretty much fact. Do you guys even realize what a huge turnaround this is for Sony -- to have developers actually praising them for how the machine is designed, I mean? Look back at how most developers felt about PS2 development, and you'll see why this is such a big deal. 

Avatar image for AlexKidd5000
AlexKidd5000

3104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 AlexKidd5000
Member since 2005 • 3104 Posts
Again grouping every PC in existence together, and saying the PS4 is better than most of them. Well no s**t! Most PC in the world are not made for gaming. Actual gaming PC on the other hand...
Avatar image for AlexKidd5000
AlexKidd5000

3104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 AlexKidd5000
Member since 2005 • 3104 Posts

I think when you take his entire conversation into account, and not just the "perfect gaming PC line" he makes a lot of logical points. The PS4 is not going to have to run a bloated OS. The PS4 is going to have a very large amount of RAM. The PS4 is going to be easy to develop on, and is designed around more than just specs. 

How is this even controversial? I mean, most people have already stated this as pretty much fact. Do you guys even realize what a huge turnaround this is for Sony -- to have developers actually praising them for how the machine is designed, I mean? Look back at how most developers felt about PS2 development, and you'll see why this is such a big deal. 

Shame-usBlackley
The OS on PC's is really not nearly as big a deal as people make it out to be. You do realize that Windows puts most, if not all other operations on hold, and frees up as much existing memory as needed while you play games, right?
Avatar image for CarnageHeart
CarnageHeart

18316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 CarnageHeart
Member since 2002 • 18316 Posts
The PC brigade is going to love this thread. I predict a lot of 'Epic doesn't understand hardware like I do' posts.
Avatar image for LongZhiZi
LongZhiZi

2453

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 LongZhiZi
Member since 2009 • 2453 Posts

I think when you take his entire conversation into account, and not just the "perfect gaming PC line" he makes a lot of logical points. The PS4 is not going to have to run a bloated OS. The PS4 is going to have a very large amount of RAM. The PS4 is going to be easy to develop on, and is designed around more than just specs. 

How is this even controversial?

Shame-usBlackley
There's no controversy- he's just dumb. There are already PC games that already chew through nearly the same amount of memory already (Battlefield 3, for example). Just because the vast majority of games are still playable on XP (which is where the bulk of those 32-bit users are). doesn't mean that many enthusiast PCs are not already capable of this- they're just waiting on the games. I'm quite sure there are millions of PCs that have specs that can compete with/exceed the PS4. In fact, I don't blame most of the XP users for not feeling super compelled to upgrade- hardly any games are taking advantage of the extreme advantage the PC has in power over current console hardware. Porting a console game that only uses 512mb total ram (system and video) should not take more than 2GB of system ram and 512mb of video ram.
Avatar image for S0lidSnake
S0lidSnake

29001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#9 S0lidSnake
Member since 2002 • 29001 Posts

More like a low end PC. This Epic guy is such a fvcking idiot that words fail to do his ignorance justice.GodModeEnabled
low end PC? 

Avatar image for S0lidSnake
S0lidSnake

29001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#10 S0lidSnake
Member since 2002 • 29001 Posts

The PC brigade is going to love this thread. I predict a lot of 'Epic doesn't understand hardware like I do' posts.CarnageHeart

That's exactly why I made this thread. I wanted to go with the other quote in the article "It's like giving you the world's best PC," but that would've been too easy. :P

Avatar image for S0lidSnake
S0lidSnake

29001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#11 S0lidSnake
Member since 2002 • 29001 Posts

[QUOTE="Shame-usBlackley"]

I think when you take his entire conversation into account, and not just the "perfect gaming PC line" he makes a lot of logical points. The PS4 is not going to have to run a bloated OS. The PS4 is going to have a very large amount of RAM. The PS4 is going to be easy to develop on, and is designed around more than just specs. 

How is this even controversial? I mean, most people have already stated this as pretty much fact. Do you guys even realize what a huge turnaround this is for Sony -- to have developers actually praising them for how the machine is designed, I mean? Look back at how most developers felt about PS2 development, and you'll see why this is such a big deal. 

AlexKidd5000

The OS on PC's is really not nearly as big a deal as people make it out to be. You do realize that Windows puts most, if not all other operations on hold, and frees up as much existing memory as needed while you play games, right?

It's not just the windows overhead. It's a whole host of things that keep developers from taking full advantage of current PC GPUs. A GTX 580 is just as powerful as the PS4 GPU but I can promise you that it wont run next gen games as well as a PS4. Developers will have just one GPU to work with when it comes to the PS4. One CPU, one set of specs. They will learn it inside and out. 

And the memory used by windows is a lot slower than what the PS4 will be using, so that's not comparable either. 

Avatar image for taiwwa
taiwwa

301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 taiwwa
Member since 2012 • 301 Posts

[QUOTE="Shame-usBlackley"]

I think when you take his entire conversation into account, and not just the "perfect gaming PC line" he makes a lot of logical points. The PS4 is not going to have to run a bloated OS. The PS4 is going to have a very large amount of RAM. The PS4 is going to be easy to develop on, and is designed around more than just specs. 

How is this even controversial?

LongZhiZi

There's no controversy- he's just dumb. There are already PC games that already chew through nearly the same amount of memory already (Battlefield 3, for example). Just because the vast majority of games are still playable on XP (which is where the bulk of those 32-bit users are). doesn't mean that many enthusiast PCs are not already capable of this- they're just waiting on the games. I'm quite sure there are millions of PCs that have specs that can compete with/exceed the PS4. In fact, I don't blame most of the XP users for not feeling super compelled to upgrade- hardly any games are taking advantage of the extreme advantage the PC has in power over current console hardware. Porting a console game that only uses 512mb total ram (system and video) should not take more than 2GB of system ram and 512mb of video ram.

I wouldn't call a major game dev dumb. He has to respond to the market. Because a significant portion of the market has the memory limitations due to 64 bit OS, they have to devote resources to making the game work within those limitations. Furthermore, map designs have to cater to the limit. 

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#13 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

This PS4 hyperhype is getting f*cking ridiculous.

Avatar image for homeboylizard
homeboylizard

1289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 homeboylizard
Member since 2010 • 1289 Posts
It's like all of the gaming sites don't know anything about hardware! It's all about gimmicks and over-hyped tech demos, pre-rendered gameplay and rumors and how awesome PS 4 will be.
Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

[QUOTE="Shame-usBlackley"]

I think when you take his entire conversation into account, and not just the "perfect gaming PC line" he makes a lot of logical points. The PS4 is not going to have to run a bloated OS. The PS4 is going to have a very large amount of RAM. The PS4 is going to be easy to develop on, and is designed around more than just specs. 

How is this even controversial?

LongZhiZi

There's no controversy- he's just dumb. There are already PC games that already chew through nearly the same amount of memory already (Battlefield 3, for example). Just because the vast majority of games are still playable on XP (which is where the bulk of those 32-bit users are). doesn't mean that many enthusiast PCs are not already capable of this- they're just waiting on the games. I'm quite sure there are millions of PCs that have specs that can compete with/exceed the PS4. In fact, I don't blame most of the XP users for not feeling super compelled to upgrade- hardly any games are taking advantage of the extreme advantage the PC has in power over current console hardware. Porting a console game that only uses 512mb total ram (system and video) should not take more than 2GB of system ram and 512mb of video ram.



The "vast majority" of PC games are always going to target a spec that's well below the capabilties of the latest high-end hardware. Enthusiasts that buy $500 video cards are a small (but very vocal) precentage of the PC gaming market, so nobody can afford to target them. Instead they design the game so that it will run on an old rustbucket with a gig of RAM, and throw in a bunch of superficial, GPU-melting post-processing effects so the PC elite doesn't grab its pitchforks.

Avatar image for Black_Knight_00
Black_Knight_00

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#16 Black_Knight_00
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts
Nvidia: "Ps4 sux. Buy our vidoe cards instaed!1"
Avatar image for UpInFlames
UpInFlames

13301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#17 UpInFlames
Member since 2004 • 13301 Posts

It never ceases to amuse me how console gamers always take the opportunity to crap all over PC gaming, but as soon as their precious consoles are labeled as or directly compared to PC's they're over the moon.

Anyway, the PS4 basically is a PC and it will be like a great gaming PC, just not for people who actually want to play PC games.

Avatar image for UpInFlames
UpInFlames

13301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#18 UpInFlames
Member since 2004 • 13301 Posts

Nvidia: "Ps4 sux. Buy our vidoe cards instaed!1"Black_Knight_00

Actually, Nvidia passed on console hardware for the next generation as they deemed it wasn't worth it for them. Nvidia is in a much better and healthier position as they are operating with a profit whereas AMD is rather troubled right now as they posted a huge loss.

Avatar image for Black_Knight_00
Black_Knight_00

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#19 Black_Knight_00
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts

[QUOTE="Black_Knight_00"]Nvidia: "Ps4 sux. Buy our vidoe cards instaed!1"UpInFlames

Actually, Nvidia passed on console hardware for the next generation as they deemed it wasn't worth it for them. Nvidia is in a much better and healthier position as they are operating with a profit whereas AMD is rather troubled right now as they posted a huge loss.

Nvidia has been on a propaganda campaign against consoles for the last 6 months. They're as close to the PC fanboy status as a company can get.

Avatar image for shellcase86
shellcase86

6886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 shellcase86
Member since 2012 • 6886 Posts

Wow, it's great to hear this from the epic guys. Good stuff.

Avatar image for UpInFlames
UpInFlames

13301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#21 UpInFlames
Member since 2004 • 13301 Posts

[QUOTE="UpInFlames"]

[QUOTE="Black_Knight_00"]Nvidia: "Ps4 sux. Buy our vidoe cards instaed!1"Black_Knight_00

Actually, Nvidia passed on console hardware for the next generation as they deemed it wasn't worth it for them. Nvidia is in a much better and healthier position as they are operating with a profit whereas AMD is rather troubled right now as they posted a huge loss.

Nvidia has been on a propaganda campaign against consoles for the last 6 months. They're as close to the PC fanboy status as a company can get.

Haven't heard anything like that.

Avatar image for Black_Knight_00
Black_Knight_00

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#22 Black_Knight_00
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts

[QUOTE="Black_Knight_00"]

[QUOTE="UpInFlames"]

Actually, Nvidia passed on console hardware for the next generation as they deemed it wasn't worth it for them. Nvidia is in a much better and healthier position as they are operating with a profit whereas AMD is rather troubled right now as they posted a huge loss.

UpInFlames

Nvidia has been on a propaganda campaign against consoles for the last 6 months. They're as close to the PC fanboy status as a company can get.

Haven't heard anything like that.

http://www.techradar.com/news/gaming/consoles/nvidia-compares-ps4-specs-to-a-low-end-cpu-1138051

http://www.bit-tech.net/news/hardware/2013/03/29/tegra-5-faster-xbox-360-ps3/1

http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/150892-nvidia-gave-amd-ps4-because-console-margins-are-terrible

http://www.gamespot.com/news/ps4-not-worth-the-cost-says-nvidia-6405300

http://www.destructoid.com/nvidia-pc-game-sales-will-surpass-console-game-sales-212102.phtml

Avatar image for Venom_Raptor
Venom_Raptor

6959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 124

User Lists: 0

#23 Venom_Raptor
Member since 2010 • 6959 Posts

PS4 is going to be awesome, couldn't care about PC

Avatar image for rragnaar
rragnaar

27023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#25 rragnaar
Member since 2005 • 27023 Posts

[QUOTE="Black_Knight_00"]Nvidia: "Ps4 sux. Buy our vidoe cards instaed!1"UpInFlames

Actually, Nvidia passed on console hardware for the next generation as they deemed it wasn't worth it for them. Nvidia is in a much better and healthier position as they are operating with a profit whereas AMD is rather troubled right now as they posted a huge loss.

They made the right choice for their business. If I remember right, they said that working on it would keep them from focusing on the core of their business. Not to compare my business to nVidia's, but we regularly get approached by people who want us to make headstones, and for us, while it is a paying gig, the time we spend on designing it, engraving it, setting it in concrete and delivering it is time we could spend producing much more profitable things that are much more in line with what we do as a business. I think people have been misreading a lot of what they've been saying and taking it to mean that they are bitter about being passed over by Sony, Nintendo and MS. From what I can see, they made a deliberate decision to not do business with any of them this time around and it seems like the right move for them.

Avatar image for yellosnolvr
yellosnolvr

19302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#26 yellosnolvr
Member since 2005 • 19302 Posts
i've been telling people that this entire company is run by idiots since early 2008. this is not news to me--not one bit.
Avatar image for UpInFlames
UpInFlames

13301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#27 UpInFlames
Member since 2004 • 13301 Posts

[QUOTE="UpInFlames"]

[QUOTE="Black_Knight_00"] Nvidia has been on a propaganda campaign against consoles for the last 6 months. They're as close to the PC fanboy status as a company can get.

Black_Knight_00

Haven't heard anything like that.

http://www.techradar.com/news/gaming/consoles/nvidia-compares-ps4-specs-to-a-low-end-cpu-1138051

http://www.bit-tech.net/news/hardware/2013/03/29/tegra-5-faster-xbox-360-ps3/1

http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/150892-nvidia-gave-amd-ps4-because-console-margins-are-terrible

http://www.gamespot.com/news/ps4-not-worth-the-cost-says-nvidia-6405300

http://www.destructoid.com/nvidia-pc-game-sales-will-surpass-console-game-sales-212102.phtml

Nothing much out of the ordinary there. They did console stuff for two generations in a row, so there must be a valid reason why they thought it wasn't worth it for them this time around. Nvidia talks a lot of stuff which is rather slanted, but it's not that far off either (for example, when you look at hard specs, PS4 CPU is low-end and the console as a whole is pretty much a mid-range PC). So what? They're hyping their product and markets. That's like saying Sony is a PlayStation fanatic.

Avatar image for UpInFlames
UpInFlames

13301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#28 UpInFlames
Member since 2004 • 13301 Posts

[QUOTE="UpInFlames"]

[QUOTE="Black_Knight_00"]Nvidia: "Ps4 sux. Buy our vidoe cards instaed!1"rragnaar

Actually, Nvidia passed on console hardware for the next generation as they deemed it wasn't worth it for them. Nvidia is in a much better and healthier position as they are operating with a profit whereas AMD is rather troubled right now as they posted a huge loss.

They made the right choice for their business. If I remember right, they said that working on it would keep them from focusing on the core of their business. Not to compare my business to nVidia's, but we regularly get approached by people who want us to make headstones, and for us, while it is a paying gig, the time we spend on designing it, engraving it, setting it in concrete and delivering it is time we could spend producing much more profitable things that are much more in line with what we do as a business. I think people have been misreading a lot of what they've been saying and taking it to mean that they are bitter about being passed over by Sony, Nintendo and MS. From what I can see, they made a deliberate decision to not do business with any of them this time around and it seems like the right move for them.

Nvidia is on top right now whereas AMD has been playing catch-up for a while now.

And having next-gen consoles architecture so similar to PC's (even if it's AMD GPU's) will only make console game optimization on PC even easier for them.

Avatar image for ReddestSkies
ReddestSkies

4087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 ReddestSkies
Member since 2005 • 4087 Posts

Well it looks like the PS4 is pleasing devs across the board. Sony is doing it right this time. 

Epic sucks now though. If I buy a PS4, it surely won't be because of their support.

Avatar image for Black_Knight_00
Black_Knight_00

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#30 Black_Knight_00
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts

Nothing much out of the ordinary there. They did console stuff for two generations in a row, so there must be a valid reason why they thought it wasn't worth it for them this time around. Nvidia talks a lot of stuff which is rather slanted, but it's not that far off either (for example, when you look at hard specs, PS4 CPU is low-end and the console as a whole is pretty much a mid-range PC). So what? They're hyping their product and markets. That's like saying Sony is a PlayStation fanatic.

UpInFlames
There's selling your products and there's slandering the competition. Nvidia makes it sound as though the PS4 will be inadequate, whereas the PS3 proved you can achieve incredible graphics with frankly meager system specs. Nvidia realizes that the gap between PC and consoles has almost been filled in the last 7 years and that investing in expensive hardware is no longer required in order to play the latest and greatest games. They sound scared to me.
Avatar image for ReddestSkies
ReddestSkies

4087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 ReddestSkies
Member since 2005 • 4087 Posts

] There's selling your products and there's slandering the competition. Nvidia makes it sound as though the PS4 will be inadequate, whereas the PS3 proved you can achieve incredible graphics with frankly meager system specs. Nvidia realizes that the gap between PC and consoles has almost been filled in the last 7 years and that investing in expensive hardware is no longer required in order to play the latest and greatest games. They sound scared to me.Black_Knight_00

What? If anything, every console generation fails more and more to initially surpass PC gaming in capabilities. Are you too young to remember that historically, the PC had to catch up to the new generation of consoles for the first year or so?

Avatar image for Black_Knight_00
Black_Knight_00

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#32 Black_Knight_00
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts

[QUOTE="Black_Knight_00"]] There's selling your products and there's slandering the competition. Nvidia makes it sound as though the PS4 will be inadequate, whereas the PS3 proved you can achieve incredible graphics with frankly meager system specs. Nvidia realizes that the gap between PC and consoles has almost been filled in the last 7 years and that investing in expensive hardware is no longer required in order to play the latest and greatest games. They sound scared to me.ReddestSkies

What? If anything, every console generation fails more and more to initially surpass PC gaming in capabilities. Are you too young to remember that historically, the PC had to catch up to the new generation of consoles for the first year or so?

Huh?
Avatar image for ReddestSkies
ReddestSkies

4087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 ReddestSkies
Member since 2005 • 4087 Posts

[QUOTE="ReddestSkies"]

[QUOTE="Black_Knight_00"]] There's selling your products and there's slandering the competition. Nvidia makes it sound as though the PS4 will be inadequate, whereas the PS3 proved you can achieve incredible graphics with frankly meager system specs. Nvidia realizes that the gap between PC and consoles has almost been filled in the last 7 years and that investing in expensive hardware is no longer required in order to play the latest and greatest games. They sound scared to me.Black_Knight_00

What? If anything, every console generation fails more and more to initially surpass PC gaming in capabilities. Are you too young to remember that historically, the PC had to catch up to the new generation of consoles for the first year or so?

Huh?

So you are too young to remember that.

Avatar image for Black_Knight_00
Black_Knight_00

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#34 Black_Knight_00
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts

[QUOTE="Black_Knight_00"][QUOTE="ReddestSkies"]

What? If anything, every console generation fails more and more to initially surpass PC gaming in capabilities. Are you too young to remember that historically, the PC had to catch up to the new generation of consoles for the first year or so?

ReddestSkies

Huh?

So you are too young to remember that.

No, I can't decypher your post.
Avatar image for kickingcarpet
kickingcarpet

570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 kickingcarpet
Member since 2011 • 570 Posts

Only difference is the graphics are better on the PC, you can pirate games for free and you can also multi-task on a PC..I mean its really NOT the same at all.

Avatar image for Black_Knight_00
Black_Knight_00

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#37 Black_Knight_00
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts

[QUOTE="Black_Knight_00"][QUOTE="ReddestSkies"]

So you are too young to remember that.

ReddestSkies

No, I can't decypher your post.

Before:

New console at launch: very very good, better than PC

PC need 1 or 2 year to be very very good like new console

Now: New console not better than PC

Is that dumb enough for you, Mr. Troll?

Ok? You might have a point, make examples.
Avatar image for S0lidSnake
S0lidSnake

29001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#38 S0lidSnake
Member since 2002 • 29001 Posts

[QUOTE="Black_Knight_00"][QUOTE="ReddestSkies"]

So you are too young to remember that.

ReddestSkies

No, I can't decypher your post.

Before:

New console at launch: very very good, better than PC

PC need 1 or 2 year to be very very good like new console

Now: New console not better than PC

Is that dumb enough for you, Mr. Troll?

You sure love to call everyone a troll.

Avatar image for Black_Knight_00
Black_Knight_00

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#40 Black_Knight_00
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts
Well one great thing came from this thread. That dude is gone.dvader654
What dude?
Avatar image for Black_Knight_00
Black_Knight_00

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#42 Black_Knight_00
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts
[QUOTE="Black_Knight_00"][QUOTE="dvader654"]Well one great thing came from this thread. That dude is gone.dvader654
What dude?

The one insulting you.

Gone as in banned? I think he just got modded.
Avatar image for Black_Knight_00
Black_Knight_00

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#45 Black_Knight_00
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts

An example that comes to mind is the N64 launch. Super Mario 64 graphically eclipsed everything on the PC until the release of Quake 2 a year later.

I can't think of a PC game that looked as good as Halo for a while.

ReddestSkies

Halo looked great, but... Serious Sam? Return to Castle Wolfenstein? Alien vs. Predator 2? Red Faction? Operation Flashpoint? Star trek Elite Force? (all 2001) And I advise you stop calling me a troll.

Avatar image for rragnaar
rragnaar

27023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#46 rragnaar
Member since 2005 • 27023 Posts
[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]ReddestSkies
Knock it off.
Avatar image for ReddestSkies
ReddestSkies

4087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 ReddestSkies
Member since 2005 • 4087 Posts

[QUOTE="ReddestSkies"]

An example that comes to mind is the N64 launch. Super Mario 64 graphically eclipsed everything on the PC until the release of Quake 2 a year later.

I can't think of a PC game that looked as good as Halo for a while.

Black_Knight_00

Halo looked great, but... Serious Sam? Return to Castle Wolfenstein? Alien vs. Predator 2? Red Faction? Operation Flashpoint? Star trek Elite Force? (all 2001) And I advise you stop calling me a troll.

SS, AVP2, Star Trek: EF and Red Faction were inferior to Halo from a graphical standpoint, some of those by a wide margin. Having not played RTCW and Operation Flashpoint when they came out (or ever, no interest), I won't comment on those.

Avatar image for sheikh65
sheikh65

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 sheikh65
Member since 2013 • 25 Posts
cant say any thing with out knowing hardware
Avatar image for Black_Knight_00
Black_Knight_00

78

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#49 Black_Knight_00
Member since 2007 • 78 Posts

[QUOTE="Black_Knight_00"]

[QUOTE="ReddestSkies"]

An example that comes to mind is the N64 launch. Super Mario 64 graphically eclipsed everything on the PC until the release of Quake 2 a year later.

I can't think of a PC game that looked as good as Halo for a while.

ReddestSkies

Halo looked great, but... Serious Sam? Return to Castle Wolfenstein? Alien vs. Predator 2? Red Faction? Operation Flashpoint? Star trek Elite Force? (all 2001) And I advise you stop calling me a troll.

SS, AVP2, Star Trek: EF and Red Faction were inferior to Halo from a graphical standpoint, some of those by a wide margin. Having not played RTCW and Operation Flashpoint when they came out (or ever, no interest), I won't comment on those.

Serious Sam and ROTCW looked just as good as Halo. I played them both on launch.
Avatar image for AlexKidd5000
AlexKidd5000

3104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 AlexKidd5000
Member since 2005 • 3104 Posts

[QUOTE="ReddestSkies"]

An example that comes to mind is the N64 launch. Super Mario 64 graphically eclipsed everything on the PC until the release of Quake 2 a year later.

I can't think of a PC game that looked as good as Halo for a while.

Black_Knight_00

Halo looked great, but... Serious Sam? Return to Castle Wolfenstein? Alien vs. Predator 2? Red Faction? Operation Flashpoint? Star trek Elite Force? (all 2001) And I advise you stop calling me a troll.

And there were some PC games from even 1995 that looked every bit as good as Mario 64, which was a blocky washed out blurry mess. Quake 1 looked far better than SM64.