He was absolutely right but "Terrible" isn't the right word, Although I will admit if he chose a less provocative adjective I wouldn't have given this article a proper look. I wana delve even deeper into the other problems Arkham City suffered from (Yes, Chris missed 1 or 2 big issues), it's proper critisism is long overdue. Almost Forgot, The Bioshock Trilogy also needs a proper re-inspection !
He was absolutely right but "Terrible" isn't the right word, Although I will admit if he chose a less provocative adjective I wouldn't have given this article a proper look. I wana delve even deeper into the other problems Arkham City suffered from (Yes, Chris missed 1 or 2 big issues), it's proper critisism is long overdue. Almost Forgot, The Bioshock Trilogy also needs a proper re-inspection ! He merely chipped away at the tip of the iceberg of Arkham City's many shortcomings.
He was absolutely right but "Terrible" isn't the right word, Although I will admit if he chose a less provocative adjective I wouldn't have given this article a proper look. I wana delve even deeper into the other problems Arkham City suffered from (Yes, Chris missed 1 or 2 big issues), it's proper critisism is long overdue. Almost Forgot, The Bioshock Trilogy also needs a proper re-inspection ! He merely chipped away at the tip of the iceberg of Arkham City's many shortcomings. I guess its up to the people who weren't easily peruaded to dissect the rest of the game. Would you do the honors ? :)
[QUOTE="UtmostAppraise"][QUOTE="Lulekani"] He was absolutely right but "Terrible" isn't the right word, Although I will admit if he chose a less provocative adjective I wouldn't have given this article a proper look. I wana delve even deeper into the other problems Arkham City suffered from (Yes, Chris missed 1 or 2 big issues), it's proper critisism is long overdue. Almost Forgot, The Bioshock Trilogy also needs a proper re-inspection !Lulekani
He merely chipped away at the tip of the iceberg of Arkham City's many shortcomings. I guess its up to the people who weren't easily persuaded to dissect the rest of the game. Would you do the honors ? :) That's a very daunting task. I certainly couldn't do it right now. In the meantime, I think this link will suffice: https://onlythesangfroid.wordpress.com/2011/10/29/no-ones_gonna_bend/
Ditto. Amazing character development, good story, strong ending, along wiht some simple but great gameplay. Love it. Big fan of what Rocksteady did with the Arkham series, too.
[QUOTE="UtmostAppraise"][QUOTE="Lulekani"][QUOTE="UtmostAppraise"] He merely chipped away at the tip of the iceberg of Arkham City's many shortcomings. I guess its up to the people who weren't easily persuaded to dissect the rest of the game. Would you do the honors ? :) That's a very daunting task. I certainly couldn't do it right now. In the meantime, I think this link will suffice: https://onlythesangfroid.wordpress.com/2011/10/29/no-ones_gonna_bend/ Lol, That one is terrible and Chris Lock already coverd most of that. Heres something I know pissed everybody off, including die hard arkham fans. 4 sidemissions, Watcher In The Wings, Identity Theft, Shot In The Dark and Victor Freeze's Sidemission required the player to locate someone/something, except theres absolutely no way to deduce where something is and when it will be there, You can only stumble across it by luck or sheer persistance, Watcher In The Wings and Identity Theft were the ultimate violators of this poor design. I pitty the person who first encounted The Watcher early in the game and spent the next 3 hours searching every nook and cranny only to discover he only appears after a specific mission is complete, and even then theres a bug that prevents him from showing up when he's suppose to be there, It reminded me of hunting for glyphs in Assassin's Creed, it was 90% luck and 5% sheer stubborness.
Log in to comment