Who is your favorite FF villain?
Mine has got to be Golbez. Even though his story sagged at the end he was a BAMF before that. Plus, I think he was the coolest looking, and had the coolest name.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Who is your favorite FF villain?
Mine has got to be Golbez. Even though his story sagged at the end he was a BAMF before that. Plus, I think he was the coolest looking, and had the coolest name.
Gotta go with the crowd on this one and agree that Kefka is one of the best ones out there. Though [spoiler] Gaff Gafgarion [/spoiler] is sort of amazing and totally one of my most memorable boss fights for Final Fantasy.
The fights with him were pretty epic (guy in the spoiler), but [spoiler] The last fight with him at the Lionel Castle Gate was unbalanced I felt. Ramza being seperated from the rest of the party during that fight to face Gaff alone was atrociously lop-sided if you didn't have him thoroughly prepared. XD [/spoiler]Gotta go with the crowd on this one and agree that Kefka is one of the best ones out there. Though [spoiler] Gaff Gafgarion [/spoiler] is sort of amazing and totally one of my most memorable boss fights for Final Fantasy.
Synthia
Kefka for me as well. Kuja and Golbez come close though.
No surprise here. Crazy clowns always make the best villains.
Spoiler Alert
I think Golbez would have been more popular if they hadn't pulled the brother card. Back in the day it might have been kind of shocking. Now it just seems cliche. Never had a lot of Kefka love myself. All though his theme and son of a submariner were great.
The fights with him were pretty epic (guy in the spoiler), but [spoiler] The last fight with him at the Lionel Castle Gate was unbalanced I felt. Ramza being seperated from the rest of the party during that fight to face Gaff alone was atrociously lop-sided if you didn't have him thoroughly prepared. XD [/spoiler][QUOTE="Synthia"]
Gotta go with the crowd on this one and agree that Kefka is one of the best ones out there. Though [spoiler] Gaff Gafgarion [/spoiler] is sort of amazing and totally one of my most memorable boss fights for Final Fantasy.
TheLoneMortal
Kefka for me as well. Kuja and Golbez come close though.
I loved that fight lol. All though the first time I tried I was like, "What the hell? Are they really going to make grind that much?" With some cheap strategy he is a cakewalk though.I liked Exdeath. Aesthetically the most imposing of all FF villians, imo. He had a certian, B-Movie actor quality about him that just won me over.
Sephiroth is the best, because he killed Aeris, and that makes FF twits cry, which in-turn, makes me laugh and laugh til my face falls off. Best death EVER. I enjoy the piss out of FF games, I really do... But the ballihoo surrounding VII is eye-rollingly insipid. It's the one game in the franchise I wish had never happened.
Kefka, followed by various ones from FFT.
Hmm I still the most dubious of them all is the Wizards in the mandatory fight before getting the crown in the marsh caves in FF1 on Nes, that an maybe Astos for always ruining my perfectly sync levels by casting death.
For the personality. Kefka
For the badassery. The Emperor from Final Fantasy 2
If you played FF2 after your first battle with the emperor you ended up sending him to hell and heaven, and of course he goes nuts and takes over the afterlife and thus you have to go into hell and battle him again...as well as heaven.
He basically became God and Satan at the same time.
I knew that the majority of these posts would be Seph/Kefka, and that's boring. But if I had to choose between the two, Kefka definitely wins. There's absolutely nothing memorable and/or unique about Sephiroth other than his character design. Other than that, to quote Kefka from Dissidia Final Fantasy, Sephiroth is "just another sadist with a god complex". Which defines almost every villain in the history of fiction.
I'm gonna go on a limb here and say that Yu Yevon from FFX is my favorite "villain". I put it quotes because to be completely honest, his agenda using Sin isn't blatantly evil, more so chaotic neutral.
[spoiler] It's about an old summoner that conjured up a cycle of destruction so that the city he loved could remain in tact, both in his mind and the minds of his beloved people of the city. [/spoiler]
He and Sin were also compelling presensces that didn't even have the slightest bit of characterization, so I feel that's just good writing on Square's part.
I love ambiguity in villains because it draws parallels with real life, making the character(s) much more relatable.
Uh... but Kefka is also a "sadist with a god complex"... In fact, Kefka is way more sadistic than Sephiroth.I knew that the majority of these posts would be Seph/Kefka, and that's boring. But if I had to choose between the two, Kefka definitely wins. There's absolutely nothing memorable and/or unique about Sephiroth other than his character design. Other than that, to quote Kefka from Dissidia Final Fantasy, Sephiroth is "just another sadist with a god complex". Which defines almost every villain in the history of fiction.
MadVybz
Uh... but Kefka is also a "sadist with a god complex"... In fact, Kefka is way more sadistic than Sephiroth.[QUOTE="MadVybz"]
I knew that the majority of these posts would be Seph/Kefka, and that's boring. But if I had to choose between the two, Kefka definitely wins. There's absolutely nothing memorable and/or unique about Sephiroth other than his character design. Other than that, to quote Kefka from Dissidia Final Fantasy, Sephiroth is "just another sadist with a god complex". Which defines almost every villain in the history of fiction.
Jag85
The difference between the two is that Kefka actually has a personality, and his presence actually carries some sort of weight. Sephrioth's only saving grace are his character design and arguably his theme music. Take those away from him and he'll probably be the most forgettable villain in all video games.
Uh... but Kefka is also a "sadist with a god complex"... In fact, Kefka is way more sadistic than Sephiroth.[QUOTE="Jag85"]
[QUOTE="MadVybz"]
I knew that the majority of these posts would be Seph/Kefka, and that's boring. But if I had to choose between the two, Kefka definitely wins. There's absolutely nothing memorable and/or unique about Sephiroth other than his character design. Other than that, to quote Kefka from Dissidia Final Fantasy, Sephiroth is "just another sadist with a god complex". Which defines almost every villain in the history of fiction.
MadVybz
The difference between the two is that Kefka actually has a personality, and his presence actually carries some sort of weight. Sephrioth's only saving grace are his character design and arguably his theme music. Take those away from him and he'll probably be the most forgettable villain in all video games.
All you have to do is ask yourself did Seph live up to his last fight? Thats a no, broing an easy.
Did Kefka live up to his last fight, Fallen angel red star says hello :(
Uh... but Kefka is also a "sadist with a god complex"... In fact, Kefka is way more sadistic than Sephiroth.[QUOTE="Jag85"]
[QUOTE="MadVybz"]
I knew that the majority of these posts would be Seph/Kefka, and that's boring. But if I had to choose between the two, Kefka definitely wins. There's absolutely nothing memorable and/or unique about Sephiroth other than his character design. Other than that, to quote Kefka from Dissidia Final Fantasy, Sephiroth is "just another sadist with a god complex". Which defines almost every villain in the history of fiction.
MadVybz
The difference between the two is that Kefka actually has a personality, and his presence actually carries some sort of weight. Sephrioth's only saving grace are his character design and arguably his theme music. Take those away from him and he'll probably be the most forgettable villain in all video games.
You're missing the point. Sephiroth was never meant to be a "sadist" in the first place. Nowhere in the game did it ever show him taking "pleasure" in slaughtering innocent people the way Kefka did, but Sephiroth did so for the purpose of advancing his goals. Sephiroth is supposed to be a "sympathetic" type of villain, not the sadistic kind that Kefka represents. Either way, Sephiroth had far more character depth than Kefka did, so if anything, that would mean it's Kefka that has less of a developed "personality" than Sephiroth.[QUOTE="MadVybz"]
[QUOTE="Jag85"] Uh... but Kefka is also a "sadist with a god complex"... In fact, Kefka is way more sadistic than Sephiroth.
Jag85
The difference between the two is that Kefka actually has a personality, and his presence actually carries some sort of weight. Sephrioth's only saving grace are his character design and arguably his theme music. Take those away from him and he'll probably be the most forgettable villain in all video games.
You're missing the point. Sephiroth was never meant to be a "sadist" in the first place. Nowhere in the game did it ever show him taking "pleasure" in slaughtering innocent people the way Kefka did, but Sephiroth did so for the purpose of advancing his goals. Sephiroth is supposed to be a "sympathetic" type of villain, not the sadistic kind that Kefka represents. Either way, Sephiroth had far more character depth than Kefka did, so if anything, that would mean it's Kefka that has less of a developed "personality" than Sephiroth.When was the last time you even played FF7? Genuinely curious.
When was the last time you even played FF7? Genuinely curious.
MadVybz
Nibelheim Fire
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6LWtGY-LAY
Only the most famous scene in the whole game were cry baby mama's boy goes on an emo rampage killing a whole village. An well he doesn't joke about it like Kefka, he does laugh about it. It has very little emotional bearing on him at all. You can read that when cloud confronts him at the reactor.
Kefka well he does have his comical moments, doesn't understand why people bother to live life, he doesnt get why should you live knowing your only going to die no matter what you do. He is what I think most consider a person without a "Soul", or the lack of "Hope". He conveys this message unlike every other villain, which in there dying breaths has a glint of understanding, no he dies knowing nothing more then when he was alive, true to his character right until the end.
You're missing the point. Sephiroth was never meant to be a "sadist" in the first place. Nowhere in the game did it ever show him taking "pleasure" in slaughtering innocent people the way Kefka did, but Sephiroth did so for the purpose of advancing his goals. Sephiroth is supposed to be a "sympathetic" type of villain, not the sadistic kind that Kefka represents. Either way, Sephiroth had far more character depth than Kefka did, so if anything, that would mean it's Kefka that has less of a developed "personality" than Sephiroth.[QUOTE="Jag85"]
[QUOTE="MadVybz"]
The difference between the two is that Kefka actually has a personality, and his presence actually carries some sort of weight. Sephrioth's only saving grace are his character design and arguably his theme music. Take those away from him and he'll probably be the most forgettable villain in all video games.
MadVybz
When was the last time you even played FF7? Genuinely curious.
When was the last time you played FFVI or FFVII?
[QUOTE="MadVybz"]
When was the last time you even played FF7? Genuinely curious.
Valknut4
Nibelheim Fire
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6LWtGY-LAY
Only the most famous scene in the whole game were cry baby mama's boy goes on an emo rampage killing a whole village. An well he doesn't joke about it like Kefka, he does laugh about it. It has very little emotional bearing on him at all. You can read that when cloud confronts him at the reactor.
Kefka well he does have his comical moments, doesn't understand why people bother to live life, he doesnt get why should you live knowing your only going to die no matter what you do. He is what I think most consider a person without a "Soul", or the lack of "Hope". He conveys this message unlike every other villain, which in there dying breaths has a glint of understanding, no he dies knowing nothing more then when he was alive, true to his character right until the end.
[QUOTE="MadVybz"]
[QUOTE="Jag85"] You're missing the point. Sephiroth was never meant to be a "sadist" in the first place. Nowhere in the game did it ever show him taking "pleasure" in slaughtering innocent people the way Kefka did, but Sephiroth did so for the purpose of advancing his goals. Sephiroth is supposed to be a "sympathetic" type of villain, not the sadistic kind that Kefka represents. Either way, Sephiroth had far more character depth than Kefka did, so if anything, that would mean it's Kefka that has less of a developed "personality" than Sephiroth.
Jag85
When was the last time you even played FF7? Genuinely curious.
When was the last time you played FFVI or FFVII?
This is problably what shows our difference in opinions.
I have both original copies of VI and VII and those are the ones I use to judge the game's quality, simply because that's what everyone went crazy over and became fanatics of. As time went on, people were able to fill VII's plot holes with a load of bullsh!t and fix the huge issues that were prevalent with the initial releases, both with re-releases of VII, its prequels and Advent Children.
That being said, I don't know what improvements have been put in place on recent iterations of VII; all I know is that the original is full of mistranslations, 2 dimensional characters (with loads of inconsistencies at that), tons of plot holes and an overall dull narrative.
The last time I played VII was just over the summer and VI the summer before. So both games are still relatively fresh in my mind, at least when it comes to the main antagonists. And by far, Kefka has far more personality than Sephiroth, simply going by exposition. You spend more time chasing a ghost in VII than characterizing it, so by the time you actually meet up with the big baddy, the whole ordeal rings hallow.
Kefka on the other hand is encountered much more frequently and is all-round a more memorable villain since he has ample screen-time to become a well-rounded character. His unique personality also gives him a bonus since Sephiroth rings similar to loads of anime-esque main villains.
Sephiroth, I remember when I was a kid how much I hated him for killing aerith. Now I see a lot of people saying Kefka, I have yet to play FF 6, I'm currently playing FF 4 so it's not anytime soon
Sephiroth, I remember when I was a kid how much I hated him for killing aerith. Now I see a lot of people saying Kefka, I have yet to play FF 6, I'm currently playing FF 4 so it's not anytime soon
da_illest101
FFIV is great, but FFVI is just OMFG. So good. I just replayed it a few months back and it was even better than I remembered.
[QUOTE="Jag85"]
[QUOTE="MadVybz"]
When was the last time you even played FF7? Genuinely curious.
MadVybz
When was the last time you played FFVI or FFVII?
This is problably what shows our difference in opinions.
I have both original copies of VI and VII and those are the ones I use to judge the game's quality, simply because that's what everyone went crazy over and became fanatics of. As time went on, people were able to fill VII's plot holes with a load of bullsh!t and fix the huge issues that were prevalent with the initial releases, both with re-releases of VII, its prequels and Advent Children.
That being said, I don't know what improvements have been put in place on recent iterations of VII; all I know is that the original is full of mistranslations, 2 dimensional characters (with loads of inconsistencies at that), tons of plot holes and an overall dull narrative.
The last time I played VII was just over the summer and VI the summer before. So both games are still relatively fresh in my mind, at least when it comes to the main antagonists. And by far, Kefka has far more personality than Sephiroth, simply going by exposition. You spend more time chasing a ghost in VII than characterizing it, so by the time you actually meet up with the big baddy, the whole ordeal rings hallow.
Kefka on the other hand is encountered much more frequently and is all-round a more memorable villain since he has ample screen-time to become a well-rounded character. His unique personality also gives him a bonus since Sephiroth rings similar to loads of anime-esque main villains.
There's not much difference between the original FFVII and the PC HD bootleg version. All it does is upgrade the graphics (increasing the resolution to HD and replacing the lego character models with normal-looking models) and audio (replacing the MIDI files with orchestrated music), while fixing the spelling errors that plagued the original English translation. Other than that, it's more or less the same game.I think what made Sephiroth insteresting is exactly for the reasons you dislike him: the mysteriousness. Throughout the whole game, we only hear about him, but never actually meet him until the end. But up until then, we get a lot of information about his backstory, and get to replay his past. It shows us how he was like before becoming evil, showing us his emotions and weakness, and pointing out how he wasn't always evil, thus making him feel more 'human'. Some of this might seem 'cliche' today, but back then, it was uncommon in RPGs.
With Kefka, we never really see the 'human' side to him. He certainly had a lot of 'personality' because of the way he laughs and cracks jokes (something we'd never see from the stoic Sephiroth), but otherwise we never see any emotion from him, or learn anything about his backstory. He's certainly a more likeable villain, because he can make us laugh even while despising him (kind of like The Joker), but I just didn't feel he was nearly as well-developed as a character.
I like Kefka cuz I like jesters, I think I prefer Kuja overall though. One of my most memorable scenes though is from FF13, I barely count this as an actual FF game but I gotta say I get the goosebumps when I watch Orphan introduce themselves in the end. You know the whole ""We are the Abandoned One, born but now to die. Our name is Orphan. By our hand, the world shall know redemption."
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment