![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/b7/Grand_Theft_Auto_IV_cover.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/0/0e/The_Legend_of_Zelda_Twilight_Princess_Game_Cover.jpg/250px-The_Legend_of_Zelda_Twilight_Princess_Game_Cover.jpg)
This topic is locked from further discussion.
That's really hard, you're basically asking me if it's either this:
Or this:
I really can't choose since both are great at what they do but if I was forced too I would probably say GTA. San Andreas alone just has such an overwhelming amount of content and replayability it's just astounding that was accomplished on the PS2. Majoras Mask on the other hand is my favorite Zelda game and while I'm definitely in the minority when it comes to that I personally think it's the highlight of the series and one of the best Action Adventure games ever.
Never really cared for GTA so...
It's an odd comparison, btw.
Kinda like comparing Quake and Mario.
Sure, they both feature jumping but...
Then again, it's your comparison so, eh, why not...
This comparison is rather dumb, but since I'm here, I'll say Zelda, definitely. I have yet to be really impressed by anything I've played by Rockstar, GTA included. Meanwhile Zelda is more or less consistently a very high quality series.
So different, it's not even remotely comparable. Zelda's a traditional action-adventure series focused on puzzle solving, exploration a good sprinkle of action.
GTA is an open-world action game focused on action, vehicle driving and a good sprinkle of exploration.
In this case, altough i don't like any game either, i point a flag for The Legend of Zelda, a game can be rembered fongly for its awesome soundtrack, second battle horse of Miyamoto was an majestic experience to try and explore, it was a perfectioned version of adventure (2600). As for GTA, game is dull, i stick in my Car CD player and no come back, just a waste of time. I speak about original games gave birth to series
Dang, did this place die or something? The activity here is not what it was before. Oh well, anyway, above users it's not the same as shooting hookers in the face.Jakandsigz
but you can't ride a horse or transform into a human/ fish hybrid in GTA.
[QUOTE="Jakandsigz"]Dang, did this place die or something? The activity here is not what it was before. Oh well, anyway, above users it's not the same as shooting hookers in the face.turtlethetaffer
but you can't ride a horse or transform into a human/ fish hybrid in GTA.
You can't use a Jetpack to steal a train in Zelda.[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"][QUOTE="Jakandsigz"]Dang, did this place die or something? The activity here is not what it was before. Oh well, anyway, above users it's not the same as shooting hookers in the face.Jakandsigz
but you can't ride a horse or transform into a human/ fish hybrid in GTA.
You can't use a Jetpack to steal a train in Zelda.You can't become a dark God in GTA.
The issue I have with people that been on OT or SW too long, they lose the ability to comprehend, where the heck is there any implication or mention of comparing the two? No where did I say compare their music, their combat, their stories, or anything, it's about which franchise is better to you overall, and I have no idea why you bust in here with your stupid self misusing the R-word for no reason thinking this thread is about comparing the two.What a retarded comparison. And thread. Honestly, if this thread was a child, it'd have Downs Syndrome.
BritishLurker
When you have two things, and you're deciding which one you prefer, you're automatically comparing them.Dudersaper
^^ This guy knows what's up.
Should you make a thread comparing Mario Bros and Persona next, TC?
[QUOTE="Dudersaper"]When you have two things, and you're deciding which one you prefer, you're automatically comparing them.turtlethetaffer
^^ This guy knows what's up.
Should you make a thread comparing Mario Bros and Persona next, TC?
Both of you are wrong, overall fun factor has nothing to do with comparison. I would have did at least some vague specifics if I was talking about comparisons. You can think one game is better than certain things another games is, but you might like the other game and enjoy it more anyway.[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"][QUOTE="Dudersaper"]When you have two things, and you're deciding which one you prefer, you're automatically comparing them.Jakandsigz
^^ This guy knows what's up.
Should you make a thread comparing Mario Bros and Persona next, TC?
Both of you are wrong, overall fun factor has nothing to do with comparison. I would have did at least some vague specifics if I was talking about comparisons. You can think one game is better than certain things another games is, but you might like the other game and enjoy it more anyway.Okay, you're right about that, but attacking someone or criticizing them when they start comparing the games in a thread like this is jsut silly. I don't know how your brain works, but when I think about what game I like more, I instantly start comparing the two. It's pure instinct, not someone misreading the context of your post.
Both of you are wrong, overall fun factor has nothing to do with comparison. I would have did at least some vague specifics if I was talking about comparisons. You can think one game is better than certain things another games is, but you might like the other game and enjoy it more anyway.[QUOTE="Jakandsigz"][QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]
^^ This guy knows what's up.
Should you make a thread comparing Mario Bros and Persona next, TC?
turtlethetaffer
Okay, you're right about that, but attacking someone or criticizing them when they start comparing the games in a thread like this is jsut silly. I don't know how your brain works, but when I think about what game I like more, I instantly start comparing the two. It's pure instinct, not someone misreading the context of your post.
Did you even read the quote I attacked which was an attack itself? Which was way more out of line I might add.[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"][QUOTE="Jakandsigz"] Both of you are wrong, overall fun factor has nothing to do with comparison. I would have did at least some vague specifics if I was talking about comparisons. You can think one game is better than certain things another games is, but you might like the other game and enjoy it more anyway.Jakandsigz
Okay, you're right about that, but attacking someone or criticizing them when they start comparing the games in a thread like this is jsut silly. I don't know how your brain works, but when I think about what game I like more, I instantly start comparing the two. It's pure instinct, not someone misreading the context of your post.
Did you even read the quote I attacked which was an attack itself? Which was way more out of line I might add.I'm not saying it wasn't. Â That user was out of line, IMO. But still, you have to admit, when people think of which game they like better, they instantly start comparing the two, and GTA and Zelda are so radically different that the comparison is a little silly.
Zelda.
GTA has a ton of creativity, and is really unique in a lot of ways. Â But the gameplay mechancis such as shooting, cover, and simple things like running/jumping are too clunky.
Zelda.
GTA has a ton of creativity, and is really unique in a lot of ways. Â But the gameplay mechancis such as shooting, cover, and simple things like running/jumping are too clunky.
sonic_spark
Thank God someone came out and said it. Â From what I've played, the games controls are far too clunky to be very enjoyable.
[QUOTE="sonic_spark"]Man you should play Sleeping Dogs. It remedies all of that.Zelda.
GTA has a ton of creativity, and is really unique in a lot of ways. Â But the gameplay mechancis such as shooting, cover, and simple things like running/jumping are too clunky.
Blabadon
And now I will. :) Thanks for the recommendation.
I wouldn't really call GTA "action-adventure", tbh.
In my opinion, the more fitting description would be "open-world sandbox action game" whereas Zelda is a "fantasy action-adventure" in the true sense of the word.
Tomb Raider and Uncharted are also incorrectly referred to as "action-adventures" when in actuality they are "linear cinematic 3rd person shooters with platforming parts".
The "action-adventure" genre is actually pretty scarce and there are few games that are actually comparable to Zelda. (Okami, ICO/SOTC and perhaps Legacy of Kain being the most comparable)
Â
p.s.: of course what I wrote is just my opinion before some "academic proof" that I am wrong gets thown at me. ;)
You seem to think Action Adventure is a game with Adventure Elements with Action elements. An Action-Adventure games can have adventure elements, but it's basically just either exploration or solving clues or puzzles with Action being the primary way of progression.I wouldn't really call GTA "action-adventure", tbh.
In my opinion, the more fitting description would be "open-world sandbox action game" whereas Zelda is a "fantasy action-adventure" in the true sense of the word.
Tomb Raider and Uncharted are also incorrectly referred to as "action-adventures" when in actuality they are "linear cinematic 3rd person shooters with platforming parts".
The "action-adventure" genre is actually pretty scarce and there are few games that are actually comparable to Zelda. (Okami, ICO/SOTC and perhaps Legacy of Kain being the most comparable)
Â
p.s.: of course what I wrote is just my opinion before some "academic proof" that I am wrong gets thown at me. ;)
nameless12345
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment