This topic is locked from further discussion.
You spend the entire game in the first person perspective shooting things and platforming around. It's definitely a shooter but has a lot more elements to it than that. Fits into multiple genre definitions, at least how I see it.
Metroid Prime's gameplay was more geared towards exploration (thus why its considered First Person Adventure by many) in order to make progress while Halo and Half Life required you to fight skirmishes of enemies before moving on to the next sequence of the campaign (though the Half Life series has a good amount of puzzles required for progressing). MP required its share of battles for progression, but it required you to seek out particular pieces of equipment to gain access to certain areas of the world as well.
Least that's the way I see it.
So are Half-Life series and unreal also First-Person Adventure?First Person Adventure.
SonOfChewbacca
It is not and has never been a shooter.
It is an Action/Adventure game set in first-person
From reviewer Greg Kasavin:
"This first-person action adventure game is filled with so much detail, style, and originality that literally every gamer should play it. It's not a first-person shooter."
case closed.
The first Metroid was a shooter that was also a platformer. Super Metroid had more exploration, but was also a shooter that was a platformer. The GameBoy and GameBoy Advance Metroid games were shooters with exploration and platforming. Metroid Prime is first-person shootingwith exploration and a lot less emphasis on platforming. The closest "FPS" game to Metroid Prime was probably Unreal, or more specifically Unreal II that came out on PC and the original Xbox, as opposed to the Unreal Tournament/Championship games that were more 'traditional FPS".Stinger78
No. also, I have played and beaten the original Unreal on the PC back in '98, that is a FPS
So are Half-Life series and unreal also First-Person Adventure?[QUOTE="TheTolemac"][QUOTE="SonOfChewbacca"]
First Person Adventure.
AFBrat77
nope, shooting is emphasized over puzzles, etc, they are FPS games. Half-Life is a step closer to FPA but in the end its a FPS.
>There's less shooting in Hal-life 2 than Metroid Prime...You want me to post all the sources for people saying it's a shooter? Also the person you quoted was talking about unreal II not one, granted I never played Unreal II.It is not and has never been a shooter.
It is an Action/Adventure game set in first-person
From reviewer Greg Kasavin:
"This first-person action adventure game is filled with so much detail, style, and originality that literally every gamer should play it. It's not a first-person shooter."
case closed.
AFBrat77
[QUOTE="AFBrat77"]You want me to post all the sources for people saying it's a shooter? Also the person you quoted was talking about unreal II not one, granted I never played Unreal II. It would be very hard to find an authoritative source that calls the games shooters. Even if the games were put into third-person you still wouldn't have a shooter. None of the elements that make a shooting other than the most superficial ones (the shooting itself) are there. You don't even aim. I can't even think of a single shooter (side-scrolling, 2d, 3d, first or third person) where the core shooting mechanic didn't require some degree of accuracy. Look past the fact that your main weapon is a gun and it becomes quite clear that the shooting is one tiny part of a much larger game. And that game isn't build around shooting. At least not in any sense that can be applied to any other game called a 'shooter'. Metroid is more like Zelda...if your only weapon was the bow-and-arrow.It is not and has never been a shooter.
It is an Action/Adventure game set in first-person
From reviewer Greg Kasavin:
"This first-person action adventure game is filled with so much detail, style, and originality that literally every gamer should play it. It's not a first-person shooter."
case closed.
TheTolemac
You shoot things,it's a shooter. More like adventure-ish\shooterMonsieurX
This is the correct answer...
It's a first-person shooter, no doubt about that. It's just not your average first-person shooter. It focuses more on exploration and game immersion than it does trigger-finger action like most first-person shooters.
Like Bioshock and System Shock right?It's a first-person shooter, no doubt about that. It's just not your average first-person shooter. It focuses more on exploration and game immersion than it does trigger-finger action like most first-person shooters.
Emerald_Warrior
[QUOTE="Emerald_Warrior"]Like Bioshock and System Shock right?It's a first-person shooter, no doubt about that. It's just not your average first-person shooter. It focuses more on exploration and game immersion than it does trigger-finger action like most first-person shooters.
TheTolemac
I've played only very little Bioshock, and never even seen System Shock before. So I'm not the best guy to ask this. But from the little I've played of Bioshock...yeah, I'd say so.
[QUOTE="SonOfChewbacca"]So are Half-Life series and unreal also First-Person Adventure?First Person Adventure.
TheTolemac
HL and Unreal are FPS games, and are classified as such. Prime is a First Person Adventure, and Nintendo officially classifies it as one.
So are Half-Life series and unreal also First-Person Adventure?[QUOTE="TheTolemac"][QUOTE="SonOfChewbacca"]
First Person Adventure.
SonOfChewbacca
HL and Unreal are FPS games, and are classified as such. Prime is a First Person Adventure, and Nintendo officially classifies it as one.
Nintendo classifies it as a First-Person action game, and if Bioshock and system shock are FPS games than so is Metroid prime. Emerald Warrior you should try systemshock.Definitely a First Person Adventure game.
Yes, this has been posted before, I know, but seriously. It is.
It's got puzzle elements and environments that encourage exploration and backtracking. I mean, sure shooters such as Medal of Honor: European Assault had wide, expansive environments and all that but it's pretty easy to tell that it's an FPS and not an FPA.
[QUOTE="Emerald_Warrior"]Like Bioshock and System Shock right?It's a first-person shooter, no doubt about that. It's just not your average first-person shooter. It focuses more on exploration and game immersion than it does trigger-finger action like most first-person shooters.
TheTolemac
yes and those I would also consider shooters
[QUOTE="AFBrat77"]You want me to post all the sources for people saying it's a shooter? Also the person you quoted was talking about unreal II not one, granted I never played Unreal II.It is not and has never been a shooter.
It is an Action/Adventure game set in first-person
From reviewer Greg Kasavin:
"This first-person action adventure game is filled with so much detail, style, and originality that literally every gamer should play it. It's not a first-person shooter."
case closed.
TheTolemac
It has never been a shooter, can some of you think outside of the box? The game has never been centralized with shooting over other elements. It is an Action-Adventure with a first-person perspective.
again, the thread should end here. Why are these concepts so hard to grasp?
[QUOTE="MonsieurX"]You shoot things,it's a shooter. More like adventure-ish\shooternameless12345
This is the correct answer...
That is the answer if your mind is closed to the big picture
Not a FPS those who say otherwise are clueless.
I know Metroid Prime and Half-Life/Half-Life 2 inside and out. Half-Life is a FPS, Metroid Prime is not.
[QUOTE="nameless12345"]
[QUOTE="MonsieurX"]You shoot things,it's a shooter. More like adventure-ish\shooterAFBrat77
This is the correct answer...
That is the answer if your mind is closed to the big picture
Not a FPS those who say otherwise are clueless.
I know Metroid Prime and Half-Life/Half-Life 2 inside and out. Half-Life is a FPS, Metroid Prime is not.
And yet it is really hard to nail down...why. I can feel it in my bones, but beyond that I'm left intellectually grasping as the term 'shooter' is in and of itself vague, in encompasses SHMUPS, run-and-gun games like Metal Slug, arena fraggers like Quake 3 and spunkgargleweewee (Yahtzee's term, not mine) games like the recent Call of Duty games. Well, I've thrown my two pennies in for what it is worth. Don't think I will be making any more posts here unless I have something new to say.I find it interesting how much some are willing to discuss/argue/philosophize about what genre this game belong too...
Anyway, my idea of a "first-person adventure" is this:
I find it interesting how much some are willing to discuss/argue/philosophize about what genre this game belong too...
Anyway, my idea of a "first-person adventure" is this:
nameless12345
Ah, but it isn't a first-person Action/Adventure
Personally I'd call Myst a point-and click Adventure
It is an Action-Adventure with a first-person perspective.AFBrat77
Hmm. I've never seen that genre in my 25+ years of gaming.
[QUOTE="AFBrat77"] It is an Action-Adventure with a first-person perspective.
Emerald_Warrior
Hmm. I've never seen that genre in my 25+ years of gaming.
That's because it isn't a genre. MP probably could just be called an action-adventure and that could be the end of it. Having a first-person label appended to a shooter made sense because the term shooter was so diverse. Truth be told a FPS wasn't just a shooter that happened to be first-person, but a type of game that evolved along specific lines and became...well it's own distinct genre. The first person in the genre title is more of description of the game than a part of a genre classification setting MP apart from other action-adventures as its own distinct genre.How do you kill enemies in any Metroid game? I think you shoot them. All Metroid games are shooters, and the fact that the Prime series is in a primarily first-person perspective, it qualifies as a first-person shooter. Why is this even a debate?It is not and has never been a shooter.
It is an Action/Adventure game set in first-person
From reviewer Greg Kasavin:
"This first-person action adventure game is filled with so much detail, style, and originality that literally every gamer should play it. It's not a first-person shooter."
case closed.
AFBrat77
[QUOTE="Emerald_Warrior"][QUOTE="AFBrat77"] It is an Action-Adventure with a first-person perspective.
Articuno76
Hmm. I've never seen that genre in my 25+ years of gaming.
That's because it isn't a genre. MP probably could just be called an action-adventure and that could be the end of it. Having a first-person label appended to a shooter made sense because the term shooter was so diverse. Truth be told a FPS wasn't just a shooter that happened to be first-person, but a type of game that evolved along specific lines and became...well it's own distinct genre. The first person in the genre title is more of description of the game than a part of a genre classification setting MP apart from other action-adventures as its own distinct genre.I don't agree at all. That's a very narrow-minded view of genres. Just because the game breaks the mold and isn't what your definition of FPS should be, doesn't make it any less of an FPS. You still aim, and shoot at things from a first-person perspective, hence the name "first-person shooter". The fact that it tried new things outside of the FPS box doesn't mean it's not an FPS. If that was the case, then Power Stone and Super Smash Bros. wouldn't be fighting games.
[QUOTE="AFBrat77"]How do you kill enemies in any Metroid game? I think you shoot them. All Metroid games are shooters, and the fact that the Prime series is in a primarily first-person perspective, it qualifies as a first-person shooter. Why is this even a debate?If that were the case, then games like Fallout 3 and New Vegas would be a combination of first and third-person shooters. It diminishes what the game really is, just like calling the Metroid Prime games first-person shooters is to say the game plays like a Call of Duty, Half Life, or Halo when it really plays more like a Zelda-type adventure. The FPS label is just too limiting.It is not and has never been a shooter.
It is an Action/Adventure game set in first-person
From reviewer Greg Kasavin:
"This first-person action adventure game is filled with so much detail, style, and originality that literally every gamer should play it. It's not a first-person shooter."
case closed.
Stinger78
That's because it isn't a genre. MP probably could just be called an action-adventure and that could be the end of it. Having a first-person label appended to a shooter made sense because the term shooter was so diverse. Truth be told a FPS wasn't just a shooter that happened to be first-person, but a type of game that evolved along specific lines and became...well it's own distinct genre. The first person in the genre title is more of description of the game than a part of a genre classification setting MP apart from other action-adventures as its own distinct genre.[QUOTE="Articuno76"][QUOTE="Emerald_Warrior"]
Hmm. I've never seen that genre in my 25+ years of gaming.
Emerald_Warrior
I don't agree at all. That's a very narrow-minded view of genres. Just because the game breaks the mold and isn't what your definition of FPS should be, doesn't make it any less of an FPS. You still aim, and shoot at things from a first-person perspective, hence the name "first-person shooter". The fact that it tried new things outside of the FPS box doesn't mean it's not an FPS. If that was the case, then Power Stone and Super Smash Bros. wouldn't be fighting games.
This goes back to my point made earlier though. In MP you don't really point and aim at all (or at the very least only very infrequently). It isn't just because that MP breaks the FPS-mould that I hesitate to call it an FPS, but also because (unlike Super Smash Bros or Powerstone) the game can already be identified as belonging to an existing genre that isn't FPS...albeit played in 1st-person. More so than a narrow-minded view of genres I am trying to look at genre labels that are meaningful. Putting MP under FPS is actually misleading, especially when there is another genre that already exists which MP fits far more readily into. If the action-/adventure genre/s didn't exist then we would have to either create a new genre for MP (which we probably wouldn't because there aren't really any other games like MP other than its sequels) or concede that MP is infact some kind of FPS. As things are we aren't in that situation.This is a very convoluted topic, I think a lot of people are just afraid to categorise Metroid (something that has always been it's own thing) in a simple 'shooter'
You can call it a 'First person adventure' because you explore a lot, you can call it a platformer because you do jump on things a lot. The 2d Metroid games weren't labelled as sidescroller shooters, all of the Metroid games are just 'action adventure' games to me. It has adventure (Exploring) and it has action (shooting).
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment