[QUOTE="hakanakumono"]
[QUOTE="Dudersaper"]I was gonna get it but I decided to go for Persona 2 first. And are the cards just about Soul Hackers or do they include other SMT titles? :oPanzer_Zwei
Persona 2 is the better choice, most likely.
I differ with you. I liked and enjoyed Soul Hackers a whole lot more than the two Persona 2 games.
Though its obviously a matter of opinions, I don't see anything in Persona 2 inherently superior to Soul Hackers to consider it the superior game by default.
It doesn't have the challenge and immersion of Soul Hackers, for instance.
Well, as you've said yourself, you seem to prefer Saturn RPGs.
My comment was a bit premature, considering I haven't actually played through Soul Hackers, but from what I know about the game, its predecessor (which I beat), and Persona 2 Innocent Sin, it's my guess.
For one thing, Persona 2 has just about one of the best stories in a JRPG from the PS1 era. Moreover, it's the most well rounded ATLUS game I've played from that era. ATLUS seems to have a habit of trying to stretch out the most amount of game time with the least amount of content possible, half-assing what they can get away with along the way. With Persona 1 this meant the mindnumbing dungeons. With Devil Summoner this was the battle graphics (although it did have very impressive spell animations for the Saturn). Persona 2 didn't give me this feeling at all. Soul Hackers does look better than both Persona 1 and the original Devil Summoner, but I dobt it will be able to match Persona 2. It may be more challenging (hopefully not in the sense that SMTIII is "challenging"), but the story reeks of 90s internet fantasy and I don't know if it will stand the test of time.
All of this being said, I fully expect to enjoy Soul Hackers moreso than both Persona and Devil Summoner (the latter I actually enjoyed more than the former).
Log in to comment