New ways of reviewing games differently?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for AustinH147
AustinH147

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#1 AustinH147
Member since 2005 • 178 Posts

What if Gamespot could add different ways for us to review games? Such as having us add those "Game Emblems" they use to represent how "Good" and/or how "Bad" the games are. :o

Avatar image for absorbent_kitty
absorbent_kitty

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 absorbent_kitty
Member since 2009 • 137 Posts
I don't understand why they get different tools to review games just because they are proffessionals, A lot of commentors on videos seems to think they are biased too, so shouldn't the oppinion of the average non fanboy user be more important? (I don't have an oppinion either way as to gamespots credibility, just to cover mah butt.)
Avatar image for BuryMe
BuryMe

22017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 104

User Lists: 0

#3 BuryMe
Member since 2004 • 22017 Posts

They could be more fun. For example, Game Revolution's review of Survivor for the PC was billed as being the first review that's more fun than the game its self.

Avatar image for freshwb
freshwb

363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 freshwb
Member since 2009 • 363 Posts

They could be more fun. For example, Game Revolution's review of Survivor for the PC was billed as being the first review that's more fun than the game its self.

BuryMe

lol