[QUOTE="Shame-usBlackley"]
$150 (or $199 at most) or it's a complete waste of a good announcement. Here's Sony's chance to show the public what an out of touch bunch Microsoft is by taking the price cut fight to them. Microsoft is still trying to push $400 bundles and the market is collapsing in front of them. Sony has a chance here to regain a sliver of its former role as the market leader by putting this revision out that makes it hard for someone to say no -- that hasn't happened very much this generation on either side, but Microsoft has gotten so slovenly and so out of touch that I hope Sony comes in here and steals that waiting-for-$199-or-less market right out from under them, and laughs all the way to the bank along the way.
S0lidSnake
The 360 has been selling for $199 for the past two years now. I think it's safe to say they have the $199 market secured.
It will be interesting to see if the cheapest option is $150. That would surely make MS drop the Arcade down to $150 as well.
Possibly, but I really don't think we'll know until that market becomes competitive. Microsoft has done a really **** job of marketing the Arcade unit, and the the trend seems to be toward price increases with them (through added value they would say), when the cost curve needs to be bending down. I mean, they've only got 1 or 2 years left at most, and the Xbox, the one most people consider the "real" Xbox, is still at $300 and up, that's fuc*ing ridiculous considering its age and hardware. Is their plan to finally drop the price when the next system comes out? That is sure to piss off developers -- "Hey guys, come make games for our next generation console while we drop the price down to where the last generation should have been two years ago, allowing consumers to second-guess a next generation purchase." The whole thing is ass backwards.
Sony used to be spot on with this kind of thing. It wasn't until this generation that they went in the toilet. I'm just hoping they'll finally take the fight Microsoft. Partly because the prices should have been sub-$150 a year or more ago, and partly because the last thing you want to do is make adoption rates for next generation even more challenging by making last generation seems like a better proposition.
Log in to comment