Quake Wars... is it really that bad?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for passon13
passon13

146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 passon13
Member since 2009 • 146 Posts

i was looking at it and it seems kind of fun, i never actually played it. why did it get a bad review? are there still people playing online? and is online fun?\

thanks for your time.

Avatar image for kdawg88
kdawg88

2923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 kdawg88
Member since 2009 • 2923 Posts
It didn't actually get a bad review, just not that good, and having played it once or twice, I think it was a fairly good game. I think the reason it's not liked by the critics is because it wasn't very innovative, and could be easily compared to other multiplayer shooters like Battlefield. Otherwise, I'd say it's a good buy for any FPS player.
Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts

Its not bad, but its worse than the BF series and it is worse than Enemy Territory.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ac102a4472fe
deactivated-5ac102a4472fe

7431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 deactivated-5ac102a4472fe
Member since 2007 • 7431 Posts

It scored about the same as BF2 diddnt it? (atleast on this site).

No Quake wars is not a bad game at all, It is infact quite good if you like the "battlefield type" of fps ^^ Units generally has access to far more devestating abilities, and it is a whole lot faster then games like BF2.

Some of the design choices I did not care for, but they were all minor quirks. Still seems to have a dedicated following aswell. Reinstalled for a few months last summer and it had a pretty impressive amount of people on then (was afraid all servers had shut down)

Avatar image for Evil_Saluki
Evil_Saluki

5217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#7 Evil_Saluki
Member since 2008 • 5217 Posts

It's not absolute poo, but there are better games of it's type out there which came out around the same time, so it's pointless.

Avatar image for Flamecommando
Flamecommando

11634

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 Flamecommando
Member since 2003 • 11634 Posts

It wasn't the best, but it was pretty good. It only had a few minor issues.

Avatar image for walkingdream
walkingdream

4883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 walkingdream
Member since 2009 • 4883 Posts

I wanted to like it but i hated it:( Can't stand it when tanks feel like mini suvs, not 66 ton war machines. Also there wasn't as much freedom as i thought there would be.

Avatar image for Bobzfamily
Bobzfamily

1514

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#10 Bobzfamily
Member since 2008 • 1514 Posts

The game didn't feel...right. The infantry play was somewhat confusing and unsatisfying, I never quite felt as though I was actually shooting at an opposing player and making a difference.

Vehicle play was terrible. They did not feel right at all, in fact even being in a tank leaves you incredibly vulnerable to basic small arms. Aside from this the camera mode while in vehicles is awful, as well as the controls.

As for people still playing, I'm pretty sure that there still is a good amount. I know that Steam offers a demo of the game, which includes multiplayer, so I'd reccomend downloading that first.

Avatar image for thusaha
thusaha

14495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 thusaha
Member since 2007 • 14495 Posts
It's good but wasn't good as other games.