Any game will have people that quit when they're losing. Thats why I stopped playing 1v1 games online, and why I haven't bought street fighter or tekken yet. Played UFC2010 when it came out online and anytime I started to really dominate they would quit. Anytime I took the first two rounds people quite in the third. It's quite pathetic
remove the quit option? hand the player points if the opponent is 'disconnected'? give badges to consistent quitters gamertags? its almost a non issue for things to be done about it.
Any game will have people that quit when they're losing. Thats why I stopped playing 1v1 games online, and why I haven't bought street fighter or tekken yet. Played UFC2010 when it came out online and anytime I started to really dominate they would quit. Anytime I took the first two rounds people quite in the third. It's quite patheticnottu
I don't get why people do that. How do they expect to get better at the game?
It's surely such a simple fix to set it so that if you quit it counts as an automatic loss of a particular score line - I think 3-0 was often used in examples. That way if the person quits they still get the loss on their record, and you get credit for still being there and winning.
[QUOTE="Avenger1324"]It's surely such a simple fix to set it so that if you quit it counts as an automatic loss of a particular score line - I think 3-0 was often used in examples. That way if the person quits they still get the loss on their record, and you get credit for still being there and winning. im surprised this has not happened. it seems pretty easy.
In boxing, wrestling, MMA and similar sports, your primary record is composed of Wins, Losses, and No-contests (your opponent did not show - often due to missing their weight or due to health problems). Itshould not be hard to implement a similar system for any game, though it would be sad to see players with more no-contest wins than regular victories.
Log in to comment