Super Smash Bros. 64 = 0.4/10!?

That's pretty low. That's almost a 0 for a game that isn't that bad. Oh well, what can you do? That review is almost 10 years old now.

I remember seeing a review for Goldeneye on N64. The guy only played the single player and had a lot of problems with it. He then went on to say how the multiplayer wasn't important and that no one would buy a game for multiplayer alone. Dumbest review I've ever seen. I'm sure someone knows who I'm talking about and maybe might have a link to the video.

That was his personal oppinion... was it on a PS magazine or something?

I wouldn't go to EP for reviews. You wouldn't believe some of the crap on the show. The stuff they said about Guilty Gear X2...unbelieveable.

Maybe it's a typo?Kenbo325

thats way too low, I personally wasnt a fan of the original Smash Bros, but ID still give it at least a 7 :?

its better to have grown up with nes/snes than the n64

I remember seeing a review for Goldeneye on N64. The guy only played the single player and had a lot of problems with it. He then went on to say how the multiplayer wasn't important and that no one would buy a game for multiplayer alone. Dumbest review I've ever seen. I'm sure someone knows who I'm talking about and maybe might have a link to the video.

PlasmaBeam44

I took this from Metacritic?

[QUOTE="PlasmaBeam44"]

I remember seeing a review for Goldeneye on N64. The guy only played the single player and had a lot of problems with it. He then went on to say how the multiplayer wasn't important and that no one would buy a game for multiplayer alone. Dumbest review I've ever seen. I'm sure someone knows who I'm talking about and maybe might have a link to the video.

prinnyhero25

I think so. Do you happen to have the links to his videos? I don't remember the guys name or his show.

It's someone's opinion. They have every right to state it, even though it's completely wrong and the the person doing the review is obviously a complete moron.

[QUOTE="prinnyhero25"][QUOTE="PlasmaBeam44"]

I remember seeing a review for Goldeneye on N64. The guy only played the single player and had a lot of problems with it. He then went on to say how the multiplayer wasn't important and that no one would buy a game for multiplayer alone. Dumbest review I've ever seen. I'm sure someone knows who I'm talking about and maybe might have a link to the video.

PlasmaBeam44

I think so. Do you happen to have the links to his videos? I don't remember the guys name or his show.

Yep, right here.

The guy works for some group known asNAVGTR(can't remember what it stands for.) and the show is called Flights of Fantasy, I think.

Oh, and the worst part about this review is that there is actually one worse...:(

(Please note: This review group made reviews back in the 90's, that explains why he says Tomb Raider 3, but that does not excuse how crazy of an idea that is.)

[QUOTE="Kenbo325"]Maybe it's a typo?TheColbert

Wow, a game rated 0.4 has to be truly atrocious. Something that SSB is not, the reviewer is completely wrong. It deserves at least (at least) a 6/10.

I remember seeing a review for Goldeneye on N64. The guy only played the single player and had a lot of problems with it. He then went on to say how the multiplayer wasn't important and that no one would buy a game for multiplayer alone. Dumbest review I've ever seen. I'm sure someone knows who I'm talking about and maybe might have a link to the video.

PlasmaBeam44