The great fps this gen

So with this gen coming to an end what were the top multiplayer fps on CONSOLES?

Id say halo series, cod series, battlefield series and somewhat killzone and medal of honor seemed to succeed. What multiplayer fps games do you think were most played this gen?

Redundant thread much? :|MonsieurX

Favorite FPS from this gen was Far Cry 3, for the campaign.

great

fps

pick one. can't have both.

My fav shooter this gen is Far Cry 3.

great

 

fps

 

pick one. can't have both.

soundcellx

[QUOTE="soundcellx"]

great

 

fps

 

pick one. can't have both.

speedfreak48t5p

Your FPS and TPS have ruined modern gaming. I am sick of it, and I want turn based JRPGs back, and RPGs in general. Nothing special about shooters.

Your FPS and TPS have ruined modern gaming. I am sick of it, and I want turn based JRPGs back, and RPGs in general. Nothing special about shooters.

soundcellx

lul

[QUOTE="speedfreak48t5p"][QUOTE="soundcellx"]

great

 

fps

 

pick one. can't have both.

soundcellx

Your FPS and TPS have ruined modern gaming. I am sick of it, and I want turn based JRPGs back, and RPGs in general. Nothing special about shooters.

[QUOTE="soundcellx"]

[QUOTE="speedfreak48t5p"] Stop posting Seriously Anyway, Far Cry 3 is by far my favorite shooter.speedfreak48t5p

Your FPS and TPS have ruined modern gaming. I am sick of it, and I want turn based JRPGs back, and RPGs in general. Nothing special about shooters.

Yeah, no. RPGs have always been at the forefront of gaming and are still super popular, just not turn based JRPGs anymore. 

Know what, I just tried a shooter yesterday since it was free with PS+. Spec Ops The Line - linear and meh story like the rest of the shooters. No puzzles no exploration, linear, WHY ALWAYS THIS SAME EXACT FORMULA??????????????? WHY NOT SOMETHING DIFFERENT FOR A CHANGE?????!!! WHY THEY ALL THE SAME???! You flood the industry with these things and then you don't even try to add any depth/substance and extra stuff in them. You just put in a 4 hour campaign and multiplayer and think it's enough and expect it to sell, which they do not always do. I mean, FPS were much better in the 90s since they actually had stuff in them other than pewpew.

There are a number of great FPS.

Shooter have improved by a large amount this gen.

[QUOTE="speedfreak48t5p"][QUOTE="soundcellx"]
No, make me. You stop posting.  

 

Your FPS and TPS have ruined modern gaming. I am sick of it, and I want turn based JRPGs back, and RPGs in general. Nothing special about shooters.

soundcellx

Yeah, no. RPGs have always been at the forefront of gaming and are still super popular, just not turn based JRPGs anymore. 

Know what, I just tried a shooter yesterday since it was free with PS+. Spec Ops The Line - linear and meh story like the rest of the shooters. No puzzles no exploration, linear, WHY ALWAYS THIS SAME EXACT FORMULA??????????????? WHY NOT SOMETHING DIFFERENT FOR A CHANGE?????!!! WHY THEY ALL THE SAME???! You flood the industry with these things and then you don't even try to add any depth/substance and extra stuff in them. You just put in a 4 hour campaign and multiplayer and think it's enough and expect it to sell, which they do not always do. I mean, FPS were much better in the 90s since they actually had stuff in them other than pewpew.

Spec Ops: The Line actually uses the linearity of the game, along with other shooter conventions, to create a meta-like scenario where a gamer indulges in a high body count while gradually coming to a darker realization as to who and what they have become in a virtual theatre of war. While the gameplay is not overtly special, the manner in which that gameplay is delivered is incredibly unique.

Clearly, the point of this particular shooter flew right over your head, but I do appreciate the irony of somebody whining incessantly about generic shooters yet deriding this particular game considering that it is anything but a typical military shooter.

As to your personal fatigue, who really cares? I'm sick of shooters as well but I also find turn-based RPG's dishwater-dull and regardless, the proliferation of the former has nothing to do with the decline of the latter.

There have been plenty of quality FPS, most recently Far Cry 3, so again, your baseless, illogical generalizations fail miserably.  

Don't you tire of being wrong?

[QUOTE="speedfreak48t5p"][QUOTE="soundcellx"]
No, make me. You stop posting.  

 

Your FPS and TPS have ruined modern gaming. I am sick of it, and I want turn based JRPGs back, and RPGs in general. Nothing special about shooters.

soundcellx

Yeah, no. RPGs have always been at the forefront of gaming and are still super popular, just not turn based JRPGs anymore. 

Know what, I just tried a shooter yesterday since it was free with PS+. Spec Ops The Line - linear and meh story like the rest of the shooters. No puzzles no exploration, linear, WHY ALWAYS THIS SAME EXACT FORMULA??????????????? WHY NOT SOMETHING DIFFERENT FOR A CHANGE?????!!! WHY THEY ALL THE SAME???! You flood the industry with these things and then you don't even try to add any depth/substance and extra stuff in them. You just put in a 4 hour campaign and multiplayer and think it's enough and expect it to sell, which they do not always do. I mean, FPS were much better in the 90s since they actually had stuff in them other than pewpew.

[QUOTE="speedfreak48t5p"][QUOTE="soundcellx"]

great

fps

pick one. can't have both.

soundcellx

Your FPS and TPS have ruined modern gaming. I am sick of it, and I want turn based JRPGs back, and RPGs in general. Nothing special about shooters.

Contrary to popular belief, there are still plenty of genres that are going strong, especially ol school RPG's. Get a DS and you'll see what I mean.

I'm having an extremely difficult time believing that you actually played Spec Ops: The Line. Since that game was entirely about story, emotion and the creators didn't even want a multiplayer option in it.

Sali217

Based on what I know of his modus operandi I'd venture to say he didn't play much of it, even assuming he actually downloaded it from PS+.

This fellow is all emotion and reaction without any analysis or logic.

I'm having an extremely difficult time believing that you actually played Spec Ops: The Line. Since that game was entirely about story, emotion and the creators didn't even want a multiplayer option in it.Sali217

Person plays Spec Ops: The Line and complains about the genre not doing anything different. Lawl.

Anyway, I'd say Team Fortress 2 is a standout this gen. I also like Hard Reset, as far as an old-school throwback goes.

I haven't played many this gen...

Bioshock 1 & 2

CoD series

Battlefield Bad Company 2

Halo 3

Metro 2033

Gonna have to go with Bioshock 1, if only for its outstanding narrative.

There's a few FPS I enjoyed this gen

• Bioshock
• Farcry 3
• Arma 2
• Metro 2033
• BF3
• Borderlands 2
• L4D 
• L4D 2
• Natural Selection 2
• Crysis

Natural Selection 2,FC3,Bioshock and L4D are probably the ones that really stand out when I played em.

I would go with Bioshock, but I might pick Fallout 3 if I considered it to be a more pure FPS.

BulletStorm and The Darkness.

[QUOTE="soundcellx"]

[QUOTE="speedfreak48t5p"] I wish RPG's would die entirely and never come back. Nothing special about RPG's.Grammaton-Cleric

Yeah, no. RPGs have always been at the forefront of gaming and are still super popular, just not turn based JRPGs anymore. 

Know what, I just tried a shooter yesterday since it was free with PS+. Spec Ops The Line - linear and meh story like the rest of the shooters. No puzzles no exploration, linear, WHY ALWAYS THIS SAME EXACT FORMULA??????????????? WHY NOT SOMETHING DIFFERENT FOR A CHANGE?????!!! WHY THEY ALL THE SAME???! You flood the industry with these things and then you don't even try to add any depth/substance and extra stuff in them. You just put in a 4 hour campaign and multiplayer and think it's enough and expect it to sell, which they do not always do. I mean, FPS were much better in the 90s since they actually had stuff in them other than pewpew.

Spec Ops: The Line actually uses the linearity of the game, along with other shooter conventions, to create a meta-like scenario where a gamer indulges in a high body count while gradually coming to a darker realization as to who and what they have become in a virtual theatre of war. While the gameplay is not overtly special, the manner in which that gameplay is delivered is incredibly unique.

Clearly, the point of this particular shooter flew right over your head, but I do appreciate the irony of somebody whining incessantly about generic shooters yet deriding this particular game considering that it is anything but a typical military shooter.

As to your personal fatigue, who really cares? I'm sick of shooters as well but I also find turn-based RPG's dishwater-dull and regardless, the proliferation of the former has nothing to do with the decline of the latter.

There have been plenty of quality FPS, most recently Far Cry 3, so again, your baseless, illogical generalizations fail miserably.  

Don't you tire of being wrong?

If the gameplay was a bit more polished, didn't have the occasional non-responsive controls and actually gave you choices it would have been a game for the ages, but despite those few flaws it was still a pretty good game overall.