Let me start this post by saying that I don't mean to sound elitist in any way. I am a big gamer and play almost every day (thankfully the other half is quite the gamer as well :D ), but I don't expect all gamers to have the time/interest to do so.
I am becoming a bit confused by what actually classes as a Gamer nowadays. It feels as though the term just gets slapped on anyone who owns a games console. Reading a recent gamespot article titled '84% of children are now gamers' made me wonder how we decide what a 'gamer' is now. I dunno, I guess I get irritated by someone who plays Brain Training on the bus being lumped into the same catagory as those of us who have bested MW2 on Veteran the same way as Picasso would get a bit p**sed by someone doodling stickmen on lined paper being called an artist.
We gamers have been around the block. We were there when Halo was good, we were there when it sucked, and we were still there when it turned good again. We were there when GTA was top down and had a half hour long soundtrack. We're lvl 80's in full raid armor, we beat Ultima Weapon, we shot people in the finger with the Golden Gun, we unlocked the Star world. I just don't think that's the same as spending a train ride with Proffessor Layton then chucking your DS back in your bag til next week. I guess it's just because I've been an avid gamer for so long and it gets on my nerves that anybody that can wave a WiiMote is seen as being 'my catagory of person'.
views? Again, sorry if i sound elitist, I'm really not. I love that something I'm passionate about is reaching out to people and becoming less and less of an obscure hobby populated by the overweight, dice rolling minority, I just wish the media could differentiate between a gamer and someone-who-has-played-a-game-at-least-once-in-the-last-6-months.
Log in to comment