Three games or One Game for $60?

Would you rather buy three older games for $60, or buy a new game for $60?

I usually buy a bunch of older games than newer games, because I get more for my buck :D

I wait for the price to lower to $40 before buying a newer game.

I always wait unless the game is super awesome and I know it will take a really long time for it to go down in price like Skyrim.

If I know I'm going to like the game, I usually buy it right away. I don't have any kids, I don't go out drinking, I got a full time job making decent money, and I don't have any other expensive hobbies. So I figure why not. I buy them when they're new. And I buy lots.

Three games every time.

Makes no sense for me to buy new. My back log of games is on the large side so I wait. Bargain bins are your friend, and mine.

Having gotten a Wii.

the three games.

most times i get games new. but 60 dollars for 3 games is too hard to pass up on.

I got such a huge backlog of games it's not even funny. Three games i have yet to finish or even start the stories on:

1. Battlefield 3
2. Legend of Zelda : Skyward Sword
3. Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim

and i'm a guy who LIKES to go for platinum's in my PS3 games. Seriously i could just put a stopper on buying games for a very long time and still be enjoying the huge swath of games i got.

I think besides picking up old Wii games for cheap, the only new game coming out soon that i simply will not miss out on is Mass Effect 3. Even going for Collector's Edition for that one game.

Depends on the game. If it's something I've been looking forward to and know I'll put a lot of time into it right off the bat, I'll pay the £40 at launch. But I still wait for price drops on other games, and scour bargain bins for cheaper games I may have overlooked.

Depends on which four games you mean, but usually I try to get the most I can which the same amount of money and wait for the expensive game to drop in price, so in this case the three games take precedence over the one.

I'd rather get the new game, since I don't know what kinda disgusting pimply-faced loser nerd owned those old games before they were brought to the store.

I'd rather get the new game, since I don't know what kinda disgusting pimply-faced loser nerd owned those old games before they were brought to the store.DerpyMcDerp

[QUOTE="DerpyMcDerp"]I'd rather get the new game, since I don't know what kinda disgusting pimply-faced loser nerd owned those old games before they were brought to the store.silentexistence

Three games for $20 each. I'm just through with the $60 purchases. It's either some massively overhyped thing I end up being disappointed in, or else it needs half a dozen patches before its playable.

Three older games, hell, I got Mass Effect 2 and both the Witchers for only $32.

It depends on what they are, but if they're old games I've played or am interested in, I'd probably pick them, especially if they're hard to come across.

3 > 1

I'd try to weigh which game/s I want more but I'd lean heavily on the 3.

I vote for getting the older games first. ;-)

Save alot of money that way.