@so_hai said:
It would never shut down, but it might change ownership.
This is most likely in the event of any actual trouble. I don't think anyone would let something that has turned it's owner into one of the top richest people in the US shut down. Steam/Valve is not just going to close up shop and dick over 125+ million users.
There are a lot more likely things to worry about, such as ISP interference, bandwidth throttling, game censorship, region-specific game prohibition, and so forth.
@henrythefifth said:
Valve's stranglehold on PC games is the reason I stopped buying PC games, and switched on consoles.
So, if Steam shut down, I would just laugh at all them fools who let Valve boss them about in matters of gaming.
Yeah they have a real stranglehold. I mean things are so difficult, what with Steam, GoG, Origin, Windows Store, and downloading games straight from a developers website/launcher! Grrrrr! Darn you, Steam! It's not like with Playstation, where you can only get games through Sony. Or Xbox, where you can only get games through Microsoft. Or Nintendo, where you can only get games through Nintendo oh and they send you a cease and desist letter for drawing fan-art of Mario.
Get a grip, bud, it's an online retailer/distributor. It's only used because it's the easiest way to buy games/get games to customers. If it's not there, something else would be. If something better came along, it would be used instead. Nobody is being "bossed" around.
@ArchoNils2 said:
I'm a bit confused. If you are afraid of Steam shutting down, why don't you just download / backup all games and any version of the Steam client? You can then start Steam in offline mode and play all games that way oO
I don't think Steam will ever go down, but if it does, they promised to give us a solution. If I wouldn't trust them, I either wouldn't buy there or do what I stated at he beginning: backup the games. I really don't see the problem oO
As long as they continue to be a private/non-public company, I trust them. If they go public, well, I might not trust them so much.
Valve, despite the occasional hiccup or questionable decision, is still a company that is for game consumers. They are still innovators. They will continue to do what they think is best for the consumer and gaming in general.
@Planeforger said:
Realistically speaking, if Steam went down and all of the purchases were irretrievably lost, I'd probably just purchase the important ones again on another platform for a few dollars each.
The vast majority of games on my Steam list are ones I'd never play again.
Yeah I think that's kind of the bigger picture here. I've been games since 1989 or so. Steam wasn't around until 2004.
I've lost, sold, or otherwise don't possess pretty much every single game (with a few exceptions) in the 15 years prior to Steam's existence. And I am totally OK with that.
What's more, despite enjoying my collection of games I've amassed on Steam, I don't touch them all. Hell, I don't touch most of them. Out of the hundreds of games I own, I probably only care about a few percent of them.
Now I'm not saying I am totally OK with losing those games--one of the perks of Steam and online distributors is having non-physical copies of games, film, and movie available all the time and anywhere--but I also don't feel totally entitled to this luxury, either, because I remember how things used to be and how they were not bad.
Log in to comment